Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Florian Dolzmann

dblp:419/8847 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0002-2591-7264ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Network security · 100%
Computer networks
1 paper
Internet architecture and protocols · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network security › attack strategy › denial-of-service attack
DDoS attack
0.912025
Forward to Hell? On the Potentials of Misusing Transparent DNS Forwarders in Reflective Amplification Attacks · CCS 2025
Network security › attack strategy › denial-of-service attack
DNS amplification attack
0.912025
Forward to Hell? On the Potentials of Misusing Transparent DNS Forwarders in Reflective Amplification Attacks · CCS 2025
Network security › protocol security
DNS security
0.912025
Forward to Hell? On the Potentials of Misusing Transparent DNS Forwarders in Reflective Amplification Attacks · CCS 2025
Internet architecture and protocols
domain name system
0.312025
Forward to Hell? On the Potentials of Misusing Transparent DNS Forwarders in Reflective Amplification Attacks · CCS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

empirical measurement · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Forward to Hell? On the Potentials of Misusing Transparent DNS Forwarders in Reflective Amplification Attacks
abstract
The DNS infrastructure is infamous for facilitating reflective amplification attacks. Various countermeasures such as server shielding, access control, rate limiting, and protocol restrictions have been implemented. Still, the threat remains throughout the deployment of DNS servers. In this paper, we report on and evaluate the often unnoticed threat that derives from transparent DNS forwarders, a widely deployed, incompletely functional set of DNS components. Transparent DNS forwarders transfer DNS requests without rebuilding packets with correct source addresses. As such, transparent forwarders feed DNS requests into (mainly powerful and anycasted) open recursive resolvers, which thereby can be misused to participate unwillingly in distributed reflective amplification attacks. We show how transparent forwarders raise severe threats to the Internet infrastructure. They easily circumvent rate limiting and achieve an additional, scalable impact via the DNS anycast infrastructure. We empirically verify this scaling behavior up to a factor of 14. Transparent forwarders can also assist in bypassing firewall rules that protect recursive resolvers, making these shielded infrastructure entities part of the global DNS attack surface.
Maynard Koch, Florian Dolzmann, Thomas C. Schmidt, Matthias Wählisch
CCS2