Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Passanesh Sukphopetch

dblp:419/9668 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-5590-0688ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › computational genomics
gene prioritization
0.912025
Automating candidate gene prioritization with large language models: from naive scoring to literature-grounded validation · Bioinform. 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation
0.312025
Automating candidate gene prioritization with large language models: from naive scoring to literature-grounded validation · Bioinform. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

retrieval-augmented generation · 1.7large language model · 1.7faithfulness evaluation · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Automating candidate gene prioritization with large language models: from naive scoring to literature-grounded validation
abstract
MOTIVATION: Identifying promising therapeutic targets from thousands of genes in transcriptomic studies remains a major bottleneck in biomedical research. While large language models (LLMs) show potential for gene prioritization, they suffer from hallucination and lack systematic validation against expert knowledge. RESULTS: The framework identified 609 sepsis-relevant genes with >94% filtering efficiency, demonstrating strong enrichment for inflammatory pathways including TNF-α signaling, complement activation, and interferon responses. Literature validation yielded 30 ultra-high confidence therapeutic candidates, including both established sepsis genes (IL10, TREM1, S100A9, NLRP3) and novel targets warranting investigation. Benchmark validation against expert-curated databases achieved 71.2% recall, with systematic correlation between computational confidence and evidence quality. The final candidate set balanced discovery (11 novel genes) with validation (19 known genes), maintaining biological coherence throughout the filtering process. This framework demonstrates that rigorous methodology can transform unreliable LLM outputs into systematically validated biological insights. By combining computational efficiency with literature grounding, the approach provides a practical tool for prioritizing experimental validation efforts. The modular design enables adaptation to other diseases through knowledge base substitution, offering a systematic approach to literature-guided biomarker discovery. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: We developed a two-stage computational framework that combines LLM-based screening with literature validation for systematic gene prioritization. Starting with 10 824 genes from the BloodGen3 repertoire, we applied multi-criteria evaluation for sepsis relevance, followed by retrieval-augmented generation using 6346 curated sepsis publications. A novel faithfulness evaluation system verified that LLM predictions aligned with retrieved literature evidence. Source code and implementation details are available at https://github.com/taushifkhan/llm-geneprioritization-framework, vector database at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15802241, and Interactive demonstration at https://llm-geneprioritization.streamlit.app/.
Taushif Khan, Mohammed Toufiq, Marina Yurieva, Nitaya Indrawattana, Akanitt Jittmittraphap, Nathamon Kosoltanapiwat, Pornpan Pumirat, Passanesh Sukphopetch, Muthita Vanaporn, Karolina Palucka, Basirudeen Syed Ahamed Kabeer, Darawan Rinchai, Damien Chaussabel
Bioinform.8