Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Elizabeta Fourneret

dblp:42/10256 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 6Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 83% Requirements engineering and software design · 17%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing
model-based testing
0.212013
Model based test validation and oracles for data acquisition systems · ASE 2013
Software testing
test oracle
0.212013
Model based test validation and oracles for data acquisition systems · ASE 2013
Software testing › test evaluation
test validation
0.212013
Model based test validation and oracles for data acquisition systems · ASE 2013
Requirements engineering and software design
model-driven engineering
0.012013
Model based test validation and oracles for data acquisition systems · ASE 2013
Requirements engineering and software design › model-driven engineering › UML
UML class diagrams
0.012013
Model based test validation and oracles for data acquisition systems · ASE 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

model-based testing · 0.2OCL constraints · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Temporal property patterns for model-based testing from UML/OCL
Frédéric Dadeau, Elizabeta Fourneret, Abir Bouchelaghem
Softw. Syst. Model.2
2019 Complementary test selection criteria for model-based testing of security components
Julien Botella, Jean-Francois Capuron, Frédéric Dadeau, Elizabeta Fourneret, Bruno Legeard, Florence Schadle
Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf.4
2016 Model-Based Testing as a Service for IoT Platforms
Abbas Ahmad, Fabrice Bouquet, Elizabeta Fourneret, Franck Le Gall, Bruno Legeard
ISoLA (2)3
2015 A systematic classification of security regression testing approaches
Michael Felderer, Elizabeta Fourneret
Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf.2
2014 Using UML for Modeling Procedural Legal Rules: Approach and a Study of Luxembourg's Tax Law
Ghanem Soltana, Elizabeta Fourneret, Morayo Adedjouma, Mehrdad Sabetzadeh, Lionel C. Briand
MoDELS2
2013 Model based test validation and oracles for data acquisition systems
abstract
This paper presents an automated, model based test validation and oracle approach for systems with complex input and output structures, such as Data Acquisition (DAQ) systems, which are common in many sectors including the satellite communications industry. We present a customised modelling methodology for such systems and a tool that automatically validates test inputs and, after test execution, applies an oracle that is based on mappings between the input and output. We also apply our proposed approach and tool to a complex industrial DAQ system and investigate the scalability and effectiveness of the approach in validating test cases, the DAQ system, or its specifications (captured as models). The results of the case study show that the approach is indeed scalable with respect to two dimensions: (1) model size and (2) test validation and oracle execution time. The size of the model for the DAQ system under study remains within practical bounds, and far below that of typical system models, as it includes a class diagram with 68 classes and 49 constraints. The developed test validation and oracles tool can handle satellite transmission files up to two GB within practical time constraints, taking, on a standard PC, less than three minutes for test validation and less than 50 minutes for applying the oracle. The approach was also effective in automatically applying the oracle successfully for the actual test suite of the DAQ system, accurately identifying all issues and violations that were expected, thus showing that an approach based on models can be sufficiently accurate.
Daniel Di Nardo, Nadia Alshahwan, Lionel C. Briand, Elizabeta Fourneret, Tomislav Nakic-Alfirevic, Vincent Masquelier
ASE4
2011 Model-Based Security Verification and Testing for Smart-cards
abstract
Model-Based Testing (MBT) is a widely used methodology for generating tests aiming to ensure that the system behaviour conforms to its specification. Recently, it has been successfully applied for testing certain security properties. However, for the success of this approach, it is an important prerequisite to consider the correctness of test models with respect to the given security property. In this paper we present an approach for smart-card specific security properties that permits to validate the system with MBT from test schemas. We combine this MBT approach with UMLsec security verification technique, by using UMLsec stereotypes to verify the model w.r.t. given security properties and gain more confidence in the model. We then define an automatic procedure to generate security test from the UMLsec model via so-called "test schemas". We validate this approach on a fragment of the Global Platform specification and report on available tool support.
Elizabeta Fourneret, Martín Ochoa, Fabrice Bouquet, Julien Botella, Jan Jürjens, Parvaneh Yousefi
ARES1