Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Cong Ma 0008
dblp:42/10808-8
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-3064-2816ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics
spatial transcriptomics |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | Inferring Allele-Specific Copy Number Aberrations and Tumor Phylogeography from Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics · RECOMB 2024 Belayer: Modeling Discrete and Continuous Spatial Variation in Gene Expression from Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics · RECOMB 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Inferring Allele-Specific Copy Number Aberrations and Tumor Phylogeography from Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics · RECOMB 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › copy number analysis
somatic copy number alteration detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Inferring Allele-Specific Copy Number Aberrations and Tumor Phylogeography from Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics · RECOMB 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics
spatial gene expression |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Mapping the Topography of Spatial Gene Expression with Interpretable Deep Learning · RECOMB 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Belayer: Modeling Discrete and Continuous Spatial Variation in Gene Expression from Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics · RECOMB 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
deep learning · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Mapping the Topography of Spatial Gene Expression with Interpretable Deep Learning
Uthsav Chitra, Brian J. Arnold, Hirak Sarkar, Cong Ma 0008, Sereno Lopez-Darwin, Kohei Sanno, Benjamin J. Raphael |
RECOMB | 4 |
| 2024 | Inferring Allele-Specific Copy Number Aberrations and Tumor Phylogeography from Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics
Cong Ma 0008, Metin Balaban, Jingxian Liu, Benjamin J. Raphael |
RECOMB | 1 |
| 2022 | Belayer: Modeling Discrete and Continuous Spatial Variation in Gene Expression from Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics
Cong Ma 0008, Uthsav Chitra, Shirley Zhang 0001, Benjamin J. Raphael |
RECOMB | 1 |
| 2020 | Exact Transcript Quantification Over Splice GraphsabstractThe probability of sequencing a set of RNA-seq reads can be directly modeled using the abundances of splice junctions in splice graphs instead of the abundances of a list of transcripts. We call this model graph quantification, which was first proposed by Bernard et al. (2014). The model can be viewed as a generalization of transcript expression quantification where every full path in the splice graph is a possible transcript. However, the previous graph quantification model assumes the length of single-end reads or paired-end fragments is fixed. We provide an improvement of this model to handle variable-length reads or fragments and incorporate bias correction. We prove that our model is equivalent to running a transcript quantifier with exactly the set of all compatible transcripts. The key to our method is constructing an extension of the splice graph based on Aho-Corasick automata. The proof of equivalence is based on a novel reparameterization of the read generation model of a state-of-art transcript quantification method. This new approach is useful for modeling scenarios where reference transcriptome is incomplete or not available and can be further used in transcriptome assembly or alternative splicing analysis. Cong Ma 0008, Hongyu Zheng 0001, Carl Kingsford |
WABI | 1 |
| 2019 | Detecting Transcriptomic Structural Variants in Heterogeneous Contexts via the Multiple Compatible Arrangements ProblemabstractTranscriptomic structural variants (TSVs) - large-scale transcriptome sequence change due to structural variation - are common, especially in cancer. Detecting TSVs is a challenging computational problem. Sample heterogeneity (including differences between alleles in diploid organisms) is a critical confounding factor when identifying TSVs. To improve TSV detection in heterogeneous RNA-seq samples, we introduce the Multiple Compatible Arrangement Problem (MCAP), which seeks k genome rearrangements to maximize the number of reads that are concordant with at least one rearrangement. This directly models the situation of a heterogeneous or diploid sample. We prove that MCAP is NP-hard and provide a 1/4-approximation algorithm for k=1 and a 3/4-approximation algorithm for the diploid case (k=2) assuming an oracle for k=1. Combining these, we obtain a 3/16-approximation algorithm for MCAP when k=2 (without an oracle). We also present an integer linear programming formulation for general k. We characterize the graph structures that require k>1 to satisfy all edges and show such structures are prevalent in cancer samples. We evaluate our algorithms on 381 TCGA samples and 2 cancer cell lines and show improved performance compared to the state-of-the-art TSV-calling tool, SQUID. Yutong Qiu, Cong Ma 0008, Carl Kingsford |
WABI | 2 |