Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Cong Ma 0008

dblp:42/10808-8 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-3064-2816ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics
spatial transcriptomics
1.322024
Inferring Allele-Specific Copy Number Aberrations and Tumor Phylogeography from Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics · RECOMB 2024
Belayer: Modeling Discrete and Continuous Spatial Variation in Gene Expression from Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics · RECOMB 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics
0.812024
Inferring Allele-Specific Copy Number Aberrations and Tumor Phylogeography from Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics · RECOMB 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › copy number analysis
somatic copy number alteration detection
0.812024
Inferring Allele-Specific Copy Number Aberrations and Tumor Phylogeography from Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics · RECOMB 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics
spatial gene expression
0.812024
Mapping the Topography of Spatial Gene Expression with Interpretable Deep Learning · RECOMB 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis
0.612022
Belayer: Modeling Discrete and Continuous Spatial Variation in Gene Expression from Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics · RECOMB 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

deep learning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Mapping the Topography of Spatial Gene Expression with Interpretable Deep Learning
Uthsav Chitra, Brian J. Arnold, Hirak Sarkar, Cong Ma 0008, Sereno Lopez-Darwin, Kohei Sanno, Benjamin J. Raphael
RECOMB4
2024 Inferring Allele-Specific Copy Number Aberrations and Tumor Phylogeography from Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics
Cong Ma 0008, Metin Balaban, Jingxian Liu, Benjamin J. Raphael
RECOMB1
2022 Belayer: Modeling Discrete and Continuous Spatial Variation in Gene Expression from Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics
Cong Ma 0008, Uthsav Chitra, Shirley Zhang 0001, Benjamin J. Raphael
RECOMB1
2020 Exact Transcript Quantification Over Splice Graphs
abstract
The probability of sequencing a set of RNA-seq reads can be directly modeled using the abundances of splice junctions in splice graphs instead of the abundances of a list of transcripts. We call this model graph quantification, which was first proposed by Bernard et al. (2014). The model can be viewed as a generalization of transcript expression quantification where every full path in the splice graph is a possible transcript. However, the previous graph quantification model assumes the length of single-end reads or paired-end fragments is fixed. We provide an improvement of this model to handle variable-length reads or fragments and incorporate bias correction. We prove that our model is equivalent to running a transcript quantifier with exactly the set of all compatible transcripts. The key to our method is constructing an extension of the splice graph based on Aho-Corasick automata. The proof of equivalence is based on a novel reparameterization of the read generation model of a state-of-art transcript quantification method. This new approach is useful for modeling scenarios where reference transcriptome is incomplete or not available and can be further used in transcriptome assembly or alternative splicing analysis.
Cong Ma 0008, Hongyu Zheng 0001, Carl Kingsford
WABI1
2019 Detecting Transcriptomic Structural Variants in Heterogeneous Contexts via the Multiple Compatible Arrangements Problem
abstract
Transcriptomic structural variants (TSVs) - large-scale transcriptome sequence change due to structural variation - are common, especially in cancer. Detecting TSVs is a challenging computational problem. Sample heterogeneity (including differences between alleles in diploid organisms) is a critical confounding factor when identifying TSVs. To improve TSV detection in heterogeneous RNA-seq samples, we introduce the Multiple Compatible Arrangement Problem (MCAP), which seeks k genome rearrangements to maximize the number of reads that are concordant with at least one rearrangement. This directly models the situation of a heterogeneous or diploid sample. We prove that MCAP is NP-hard and provide a 1/4-approximation algorithm for k=1 and a 3/4-approximation algorithm for the diploid case (k=2) assuming an oracle for k=1. Combining these, we obtain a 3/16-approximation algorithm for MCAP when k=2 (without an oracle). We also present an integer linear programming formulation for general k. We characterize the graph structures that require k>1 to satisfy all edges and show such structures are prevalent in cancer samples. We evaluate our algorithms on 381 TCGA samples and 2 cancer cell lines and show improved performance compared to the state-of-the-art TSV-calling tool, SQUID.
Yutong Qiu, Cong Ma 0008, Carl Kingsford
WABI2