Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lisa Kiekbusch

dblp:42/11271 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program verification · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program verification
model checking
0.212013
Tool-assisted verification of behaviour networks · ICRA 2013
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
behavior-based control
0.012013
Tool-assisted verification of behaviour networks · ICRA 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

model checking · 0.3finite state automata · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Tool-assisted verification of behaviour networks
abstract
This paper deals with the problem of assisting developers when verifying properties of complex behaviour-based systems. A central aspect of behaviour-based systems is the interaction between the behaviours, as a lot of the functionality of a system typically arises from this interaction. Hence, verification has to deal with the specialities of behaviour interaction. Previous work has introduced a concept for modelling behaviour-based systems as networks of finite-state automata and for applying model checking as verification technique. As the manual verification of large networks is tedious and errorprone, the work at hand introduces a concept for assisting developers by partly automating the verification process. The applicability of the presented approach is demonstrated using the behaviour-based control system of an autonomous bucket excavator.
Christopher Armbrust, Lisa Kiekbusch, Thorsten Ropertz, Karsten Berns
ICRA2
2011 Using Behaviour Activity Sequences for Motion Generation and Situation Recognition
Christopher Armbrust, Lisa Kiekbusch, Karsten Berns
ICINCO (2)2