Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Melanie Gnasa

dblp:42/188 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 1 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › distributed information retrieval
integrated search
0.112007
ISKODOR: unified user modeling for integrated searching · SIGIR 2007
Information retrieval
search interfaces
0.112007
ISKODOR: unified user modeling for integrated searching · SIGIR 2007
Information retrieval › web search
collaborative web search
0.012004
Sharing knowledge online (abstract only): a dream or reality? · SIGIR 2004
Information retrieval › web search
search personalization
0.012004
Sharing knowledge online (abstract only): a dream or reality? · SIGIR 2004
Information retrieval
web search
0.012004
Sharing knowledge online (abstract only): a dream or reality? · SIGIR 2004
Information retrieval › user interaction
personalization
0.012007
ISKODOR: unified user modeling for integrated searching · SIGIR 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user modeling · 0.1graphical interaction · 0.1ranking aggregation · 0.0peer-to-peer architecture · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 ISKODOR: unified user modeling for integrated searching
abstract
ISKODOR integrates personal collections, peer search, and centralized search services. User modeling in ISKODOR fills three roles: discovery of sites with suitable information stores, context-based query interpretation, and automatic profile-based filtering of new information. Explanation and control are achieved through graphical depiction of sources, explicit feedback regard ingutility, and explicit control over peer association behavior and information sharing.
Melanie Gnasa, Armin B. Cremers, Douglas W. Oard
SIGIR1
2006 Beyond the Web: Retrieval in Social Information Spaces
Sebastian Marius Kirsch, Melanie Gnasa, Armin B. Cremers
ECIR2
2005 Personalized Peer Filtering for a Dynamic Information Push
Melanie Gnasa, Sascha Alda, Nadir Gül, Armin B. Cremers
ISMIS1
2004 Cooperative Pull-Push Cycle for Searching a Hybrid P2P Network
Melanie Gnasa, Sascha Alda, Nadir Gül, Jasmin Grigull, Armin B. Cremers
Peer-to-Peer Computing1
2004 Sharing knowledge online (abstract only): a dream or reality?
abstract
The Web provides a global platform for knowledge sharing. However, several shortcomings still arise from the absence of personalization and collaboration in Web searches. More effective retrieval techniques could be provided by means of transforming explicit knowledge into implicit knowledge. The approach presented in this paper is based on a peer-to-peer architecture and aims at complementing classical Web searches in terms of personalized ranking lists. These local rankings can be accumulated and evaluated in order to supplement the process of knowledge generation by building Virtual Knowledge Communities. Furthermore, the aggregation of ranking lists can be used to identify topics as well as communities of interest. Together with social aspects for community support, a framework for congenial Web search is defined.
Melanie Gnasa
SIGIR1
2004 Three Pillars for Congenial Web Searching - Continuous Evaluation for enhancing Web Search Effectiveness
Melanie Gnasa, Markus Won, Armin B. Cremers
J. Web Eng.1