Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Peter Auer
dblp:42/2392
· DBLP profile ↗
62ranked-venue papers
41as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-8385-9635ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 45 · 28 first-author · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 13 · 11 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
29 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 66% Learning theory · 28% Image recognition and object detection · 2% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Network security · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
7 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 45% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 22% Approximation and online algorithms · 16% |
Topics — the 30 heaviest of 57, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-armed bandit |
1.6 | 7 | 2019 | Adaptively Tracking the Best Bandit Arm with an Unknown Number of Distribution Changes · COLT 2019 Achieving Optimal Dynamic Regret for Non-stationary Bandits without Prior Information · COLT 2019 Online Learning With Randomized Feedback Graphs for Optimal PUE Attacks in Cognitive Radio Networks · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit
non-stationary bandits |
0.8 | 2 | 2019 | Adaptively Tracking the Best Bandit Arm with an Unknown Number of Distribution Changes · COLT 2019 Achieving Optimal Dynamic Regret for Non-stationary Bandits without Prior Information · COLT 2019 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
exploration in markov decision processes |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Autonomous Exploration for Navigating in MDPs Using Blackbox RL Algorithms · IJCAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › sample efficiency
sample complexity of reinforcement learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Autonomous Exploration for Navigating in MDPs Using Blackbox RL Algorithms · IJCAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning |
0.5 | 7 | 2018 | Online Learning With Randomized Feedback Graphs for Optimal PUE Attacks in Cognitive Radio Networks · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2018 Workshop summary: On-line learning with limited feedback · ICML 2009 Adaptive and Self-Confident On-Line Learning Algorithms · COLT 2000 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
contextual bandit |
0.5 | 2 | 2019 | Achieving Optimal Dynamic Regret for Non-stationary Bandits without Prior Information · COLT 2019 PAC-Bayesian Analysis of Contextual Bandits · NIPS 2011 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
regret minimization |
0.5 | 4 | 2019 | Adaptively Tracking the Best Bandit Arm with an Unknown Number of Distribution Changes · COLT 2019 Logarithmic Online Regret Bounds for Undiscounted Reinforcement Learning · NIPS 2006 Using Upper Confidence Bounds for Online Learning · FOCS 2000 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning › regret bounds
dynamic regret |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Achieving Optimal Dynamic Regret for Non-stationary Bandits without Prior Information · COLT 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning › partial feedback
feedback graph |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Online Learning With Randomized Feedback Graphs for Optimal PUE Attacks in Cognitive Radio Networks · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2018 |
Network security › wireless network security
cognitive radio network security |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Online Learning With Randomized Feedback Graphs for Optimal PUE Attacks in Cognitive Radio Networks · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2018 |
Network security › wireless network security › cognitive radio network security
primary user emulation attack |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Online Learning With Randomized Feedback Graphs for Optimal PUE Attacks in Cognitive Radio Networks · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds |
0.3 | 3 | 2011 | PAC-Bayesian Analysis of Contextual Bandits · NIPS 2011 Near-optimal Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2010 Near-optimal Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learning · NIPS 2008 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit
stochastic and adversarial bandits |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | An algorithm with nearly optimal pseudo-regret for both stochastic and adversarial bandits · COLT 2016 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
PAC learning |
0.2 | 5 | 2012 | PAC Subset Selection in Stochastic Multi-armed Bandits · ICML 2012 A New PAC Bound for Intersection-Closed Concept Classes · COLT 2004 Approximating Hyper-Rectangles: Learning and Pseudo-Random Sets · STOC 1997 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
exploration-exploitation tradeoff |
0.2 | 5 | 2008 | Near-optimal Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learning · NIPS 2008 Logarithmic Online Regret Bounds for Undiscounted Reinforcement Learning · NIPS 2006 Using Confidence Bounds for Exploitation-Exploration Trade-offs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2002 |
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
online-to-batch conversion |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Autonomous Exploration for Navigating in MDPs Using Blackbox RL Algorithms · IJCAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
bandit theory |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | PAC Subset Selection in Stochastic Multi-armed Bandits · ICML 2012 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
concentration inequalities |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | PAC-Bayesian Inequalities for Martingales · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2012 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › concentration inequalities
martingale inequalities |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | PAC-Bayesian Inequalities for Martingales · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2012 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
PAC-Bayesian analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | PAC-Bayesian Inequalities for Martingales · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2012 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
subset selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | PAC Subset Selection in Stochastic Multi-armed Bandits · ICML 2012 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
mutual information |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | PAC-Bayesian Analysis of Contextual Bandits · NIPS 2011 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › regret minimization
near-optimal regret bounds |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Near-optimal Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2010 |
Wireless networking
cognitive radio |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Online Learning With Randomized Feedback Graphs for Optimal PUE Attacks in Cognitive Radio Networks · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Near-optimal Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learning · NIPS 2008 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit › non-parametric bandit
continuum-armed bandits |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Improved Rates for the Stochastic Continuum-Armed Bandit Problem · COLT 2007 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit
stochastic bandit |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Improved Rates for the Stochastic Continuum-Armed Bandit Problem · COLT 2007 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Generic Object Recognition with Boosting · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2006 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
undiscounted reinforcement learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Logarithmic Online Regret Bounds for Undiscounted Reinforcement Learning · NIPS 2006 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
upper confidence bound |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Logarithmic Online Regret Bounds for Undiscounted Reinforcement Learning · NIPS 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
regret analysis · 1.5black-box reinforcement learning · 1.3online learning · 1.1randomized feedback graphs · 1.0change detection · 0.4information theory · 0.1PAC-Bayesian analysis · 0.1boosting · 0.1bandit feedback · 0.1upper confidence bound · 0.1lower bound · 0.0pseudorandomness · 0.0PAC learning · 0.0bounds analysis · 0.0expert advice · 0.0decision trees · 0.0adversarial analysis · 0.0simulation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Improved Best-of-Both-Worlds Regret for Bandits with Delayed FeedbackabstractWe study the multi-armed bandit problem with adversarially chosen delays in the Best-of-Both-Worlds (BoBW) framework, which aims to achieve near-optimal performance in both stochastic and adversarial environments. While prior work has made progress toward this goal, existing algorithms suffer from significant gaps to the known lower bounds, especially in the stochastic settings. Our main contribution is a new algorithm that, up to logarithmic factors, matches the known lower bounds in each setting individually.
In the adversarial case, our algorithm achieves regret of $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{KT} + \sqrt{D})$, which is optimal up to logarithmic terms, where $T$ is the number of rounds, $K$ is the number of arms, and $D$ is the cumulative delay. In the stochastic case, we provide a regret bound which scale as $\sum_{i:\Delta_i>0}(\log T/\Delta_i) + \frac{1}{K}\sum \Delta_i \sigma_{max}$, where $\Delta_i$ is the suboptimality gap of arm $i$ and $\sigma_{\max}$ is the maximum number of missing observations.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first BoBW algorithm to simultaneously match the lower bounds in both stochastic and adversarial regimes. Moreover, even beyond the BoBW setting, our stochastic regret bound is the first to match the known lower bound under adversarial delays, improving the second term over the best known result by a factor of $K$. Ofir Schlisselberg, Tal Lancewicki, Peter Auer, Yishay Mansour |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2023 | Autonomous Exploration for Navigating in MDPs Using Blackbox RL AlgorithmsabstractWe consider the problem of navigating in a Markov decision process where extrinsic rewards are either absent or ignored. In this setting, the objective is to learn policies to reach all the states that are reachable within a given number of steps (in expectation) from a starting state. We introduce a novel meta-algorithm which can use any online reinforcement learning algorithm (with appropriate regret guarantees) as a black-box. Our algorithm demonstrates a method for transforming the output of online algorithms to a batch setting. We prove an upper bound on the sample complexity of our algorithm in terms of the regret bound of the used black-box RL algorithm. Furthermore, we provide experimental results to validate the effectiveness of our algorithm and correctness of our theoretical results. Pratik Gajane, Peter Auer, Ronald Ortner |
IJCAI | 2 |
| 2019 | Achieving Optimal Dynamic Regret for Non-stationary Bandits without Prior InformationabstractThis joint extended abstract introduces and compares the results of (Auer et al., 2019) and (Chen et al., 2019), both of which resolve the problem of achieving optimal dynamic regret for non-stationary bandits without prior information on the non-stationarity. Specifically, Auer et al. (2019) resolve the problem for the traditional multi-armed bandits setting, while Chen et al. (2019) give a solution for the more general contextual bandits setting. Both works extend the key idea of (Auer et al., 2018) developed for a simpler two-armed setting. Peter Auer, Pratik Gajane, Chung-wei Lee, Ronald Ortner, Chen-Yu Wei |
COLT | 1 |
| 2019 | Adaptively Tracking the Best Bandit Arm with an Unknown Number of Distribution ChangesabstractWe consider the variant of the stochastic multi-armed bandit problem where the stochastic reward distributions may change abruptly several times. In contrast to previous work, we are able to achieve (nearly) optimal mini-max regret bounds without knowing the number of changes. For this setting, we propose an algorithm called ADSWITCH and provide performance guarantees for the regret evaluated against the optimal non-stationary policy. Our regret bound is the first optimal bound for an algorithm that is not tuned with respect to the number of changes. Peter Auer, Pratik Gajane, Ronald Ortner |
COLT | 1 |
| 2019 | Variational Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learning
Ronald Ortner, Pratik Gajane, Peter Auer |
UAI | 3 |
| 2018 | Online Learning With Randomized Feedback Graphs for Optimal PUE Attacks in Cognitive Radio Networks
Monireh Dabaghchian, Amir Alipour-Fanid, Kai Zeng 0001, Qingsi Wang, Peter Auer |
IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. | 5 |
| 2016 | Pareto Front Identification from Stochastic Bandit FeedbackabstractWe consider the problem of identifying the Pareto front for multiple objectives from a finite set of operating points. Sampling an operating point gives a random vector where each coordinate corresponds to the value of one of the objectives. The Pareto front is the set of operating points that are not dominated by any other operating point in respect to all objectives (considering the mean of their objective values). We propose a confidence bound algorithm to approximate the Pareto front, and prove problem specific lower and upper bounds, showing that the sample complexity is characterized by some natural geometric properties of the operating points. Experiments confirm the reliability of our algorithm. For the problem of finding a sparse cover of the Pareto front, we propose an asymmetric covering algorithm of independent interest. Peter Auer, Chao-Kai Chiang, Ronald Ortner, Madalina M. Drugan |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2016 | An algorithm with nearly optimal pseudo-regret for both stochastic and adversarial banditsabstractWe present an algorithm that achieves almost optimal pseudo-regret bounds against adversarial and stochastic bandits. Against adversarial bandits the pseudo-regret is O(K\sqrtn \log n) and against stochastic bandits the pseudo-regret is O(\sum_i (\log n)/\Delta_i). We also show that no algorithm with O(\log n) pseudo-regret against stochastic bandits can achieve \tildeO(\sqrtn) expected regret against adaptive adversarial bandits. This complements previous results of Bubeck and Slivkins (2012) that show \tildeO(\sqrtn) expected adversarial regret with O((\log n)^2) stochastic pseudo-regret. Peter Auer, Chao-Kai Chiang |
COLT | 1 |
| 2016 | Guest editors' foreword
Peter Auer, Alexander Clark, Thomas Zeugmann |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 1 |
| 2014 | Editors' Introduction
Peter Auer, Alexander Clark, Thomas Zeugmann, Sandra Zilles |
ALT | 1 |
| 2014 | Regret bounds for restless Markov bandits
Ronald Ortner, Daniil Ryabko, Peter Auer, Rémi Munos |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 3 |
| 2012 | Regret Bounds for Restless Markov Bandits
Ronald Ortner, Daniil Ryabko, Peter Auer, Rémi Munos |
ALT | 3 |
| 2012 | PAC Subset Selection in Stochastic Multi-armed Bandits
Shivaram Kalyanakrishnan, Ambuj Tewari, Peter Auer, Peter Stone 0001 |
ICML | 3 |
| 2012 | PAC-Bayesian Inequalities for Martingales
Yevgeny Seldin, François Laviolette, Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi, John Shawe-Taylor, Peter Auer |
UAI | 5 |
| 2012 | PAC-Bayesian Inequalities for MartingalesabstractWe present a set of high-probability inequalities that control the concentration of weighted averages of multiple (possibly uncountably many) simultaneously evolving and interdependent martingales. Our results extend the PAC-Bayesian (probably approximately correct) analysis in learning theory from the i.i.d. setting to martingales opening the way for its application to importance weighted sampling, reinforcement learning, and other interactive learning domains, as well as many other domains in probability theory and statistics, where martingales are encountered. We also present a comparison inequality that bounds the expectation of a convex function of a martingale difference sequence shifted to the$[0, 1]$interval by the expectation of the same function of independent Bernoulli random variables. This inequality is applied to derive a tighter analog of Hoeffding–Azuma's inequality. Yevgeny Seldin, François Laviolette, Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi, John Shawe-Taylor, Peter Auer |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 5 |
| 2011 | Models for Autonomously Motivated Exploration in Reinforcement Learning - (Extended Abstract)
Peter Auer, Shiau Hong Lim, Chris Watkins |
ALT | 1 |
| 2011 | Upper-Confidence-Bound Algorithms for Active Learning in Multi-armed Bandits
Alexandra Carpentier, Alessandro Lazaric, Mohammad Ghavamzadeh, Rémi Munos, Peter Auer |
ALT | 5 |
| 2011 | Models for Autonomously Motivated Exploration in Reinforcement Learning
Peter Auer, Shiau Hong Lim, Chris Watkins |
Discovery Science | 1 |
| 2011 | PAC-Bayesian Analysis of Contextual BanditsabstractWe derive an instantaneous (per-round) data-dependent regret bound for stochastic multiarmed bandits with side information (also known as contextual bandits). The scaling of our regret bound with the number of states (contexts) $N$ goes as $\sqrt{N I_{\rho_t}(S;A)}$, where $I_{\rho_t}(S;A)$ is the mutual information between states and actions (the side information) used by the algorithm at round $t$. If the algorithm uses all the side information, the regret bound scales as $\sqrt{N \ln K}$, where $K$ is the number of actions (arms). However, if the side information $I_{\rho_t}(S;A)$ is not fully used, the regret bound is significantly tighter. In the extreme case, when $I_{\rho_t}(S;A) = 0$, the dependence on the number of states reduces from linear to logarithmic. Our analysis allows to provide the algorithm large amount of side information, let the algorithm to decide which side information is relevant for the task, and penalize the algorithm only for the side information that it is using de facto. We also present an algorithm for multiarmed bandits with side information with computational complexity that is a linear in the number of actions. Yevgeny Seldin, Peter Auer, François Laviolette, John Shawe-Taylor, Ronald Ortner |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2011 | Noisy Search with Comparative Feedback
Shiau Hong Lim, Peter Auer |
UAI | 2 |
| 2010 | Exploration-Exploitation of Eye Movement Enriched Multiple Feature Spaces for Content-Based Image Retrieval
Zakria Hussain, Alex Po Leung, Kitsuchart Pasupa, David R. Hardoon, Peter Auer, John Shawe-Taylor |
ECML/PKDD (1) | 5 |
| 2010 | Near-optimal Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learning
Thomas Jaksch, Ronald Ortner, Peter Auer |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2009 | Workshop summary: On-line learning with limited feedback
Jean-Yves Audibert, Peter Auer, Alessandro Lazaric, Rémi Munos, Daniil Ryabko, Csaba Szepesvári |
ICML | 2 |
| 2009 | Consistent Interpretation of Image Sequences to Improve Object Models on the Fly
Johann Prankl, Martin Antenreiter, Peter Auer, Markus Vincze |
ICVS | 3 |
| 2008 | Near-optimal Regret Bounds for Reinforcement LearningabstractFor undiscounted reinforcement learning in Markov decision processes (MDPs) we consider the total regret of a learning algorithm with respect to an optimal policy. In order to describe the transition structure of an MDP we propose a new parameter: An MDP has diameter D if for any pair of states s1,s2 there is a policy which moves from s1 to s2 in at most D steps (on average). We present a reinforcement learning algorithm with total regret O(DSAT) after T steps for any unknown MDP with S states, A actions per state, and diameter D. This bound holds with high probability. We also present a corresponding lower bound of Omega(DSAT) on the total regret of any learning algorithm. Both bounds demonstrate the utility of the diameter as structural parameter of the MDP. Peter Auer, Thomas Jaksch, Ronald Ortner |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2008 | Guest editors' introduction: Special issue on learning theory
Peter Auer, Philip M. Long |
J. Comput. Syst. Sci. | 1 |
| 2008 | A learning rule for very simple universal approximators consisting of a single layer of perceptrons
Peter Auer, Harald Burgsteiner, Wolfgang Maass 0001 |
Neural Networks | 1 |
| 2007 | Improved Rates for the Stochastic Continuum-Armed Bandit Problem
Peter Auer, Ronald Ortner, Csaba Szepesvári |
COLT | 1 |
| 2007 | A new PAC bound for intersection-closed concept classes
Peter Auer, Ronald Ortner |
Mach. Learn. | 1 |
| 2006 | Hannan Consistency in On-Line Learning in Case of Unbounded Losses Under Partial Monitoring
Chamy Allenberg, Peter Auer, László Györfi, György Ottucsák |
ALT | 2 |
| 2006 | Logarithmic Online Regret Bounds for Undiscounted Reinforcement LearningabstractWe present a learning algorithm for undiscounted reinforcement learning. Our interest lies in bounds for the algorithm's online performance after some finite number of steps. In the spirit of similar methods already successfully applied for the exploration-exploitation tradeoff in multi-armed bandit problems, we use upper confidence bounds to show that our UCRL algorithm achieves logarithmic online regret in the number of steps taken with respect to an optimal policy. Peter Auer, Ronald Ortner |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2006 | Generic Object Recognition with BoostingabstractThis paper explores the power and the limitations of weakly supervised categorization. We present a complete framework that starts with the extraction of various local regions of either discontinuity or homogeneity. A variety of local descriptors can be applied to form a set of feature vectors for each local region. Boosting is used to learn a subset of such feature vectors (weak hypotheses) and to combine them into one final hypothesis for each visual category. This combination of individual extractors and descriptors leads to recognition rates that are superior to other approaches which use only one specific extractor/descriptor setting. To explore the limitation of our system, we had to set up new, highly complex image databases that show the objects of interest at varying scales and poses, in cluttered background, and under considerable occlusion. We obtain classification results up to 81 percent ROC-equal error rate on the most complex of our databases. Our approach outperforms all comparable solutions on common databases. Andreas Opelt, Axel Pinz, Michael Fussenegger, Peter Auer |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 4 |
| 2004 | A New PAC Bound for Intersection-Closed Concept Classes
Peter Auer, Ronald Ortner |
COLT | 1 |
| 2004 | Weak Hypotheses and Boosting for Generic Object Detection and Recognition
Andreas Opelt, Michael Fussenegger, Axel Pinz, Peter Auer |
ECCV (2) | 4 |
| 2004 | A Boosting Approach to Multiple Instance Learning
Peter Auer, Ronald Ortner |
ECML | 1 |
| 2002 | Reducing Communication for Distributed Learning in Neural Networks
Peter Auer, Harald Burgsteiner, Wolfgang Maass 0001 |
ICANN | 1 |
| 2002 | Adaptive and Self-Confident On-Line Learning Algorithms
Peter Auer, Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi, Claudio Gentile |
J. Comput. Syst. Sci. | 1 |
| 2002 | Using Confidence Bounds for Exploitation-Exploration Trade-offs
Peter Auer |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2002 | Finite-time Analysis of the Multiarmed Bandit Problem
Peter Auer, Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi, Paul Fischer |
Mach. Learn. | 1 |
| 2002 | The Nonstochastic Multiarmed Bandit ProblemabstractIn the multiarmed bandit problem, a gambler must decide which arm of K nonidentical slot machines to play in a sequence of trials so as to maximize his reward. This classical problem has received much attention because of the simple model it provides of the trade-off between exploration (trying out each arm to find the best one) and exploitation (playing the arm believed to give the best payoff). Past solutions for the bandit problem have almost always relied on assumptions about the statistics of the slot machines. In this work, we make no statistical assumptions whatsoever about the nature of the process generating the payoffs of the slot machines. We give a solution to the bandit problem in which an adversary, rather than a well-behaved stochastic process, has complete control over the payoffs. In a sequence of T plays, we prove that the per-round payoff of our algorithm approaches that of the best arm at the rate O(T -1/2 ). We show by a matching lower bound that this is the best possible. We also prove that our algorithm approaches the per-round payoff of any set of strategies at a similar rate: if the best strategy is chosen from a pool of N strategies, then our algorithm approaches the per-round payoff of the strategy at the rate O((log N 1/2 T -1/2 ). Finally, we apply our results to the problem of playing an unknown repeated matrix game. We show that our algorithm approaches the minimax payoff of the unknown game at the rate O(T -1/2 ). Peter Auer, Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi, Yoav Freund, Robert E. Schapire |
SIAM J. Comput. | 1 |
| 2000 | An Improved On-line Algorithm for Learning Linear Evaluation Functions
Peter Auer |
COLT | 1 |
| 2000 | Adaptive and Self-Confident On-Line Learning Algorithms
Peter Auer, Claudio Gentile |
COLT | 1 |
| 2000 | Using Upper Confidence Bounds for Online LearningabstractWe show how a standard tool from statistics, namely confidence bounds, can be used to elegantly deal with situations which exhibit an exploitation/exploration trade-off. Our technique for designing and analyzing algorithms for such situations is very general and can be applied when an algorithm has to make exploitation-versus-exploration decisions based on uncertain information provided by a random process. We consider two models with such an exploitation/exploration trade-off. For the adversarial bandit problem our new algorithm suffers only O/spl tilde/(T/sup 1/2/) regret over T trials which improves significantly over the previously best O/spl tilde/(T/sup 2/3/) regret. We also extend our results for the adversarial bandit problem to shifting bandits. The second model we consider is associative reinforcement learning with linear value functions. For this model our technique improves the regret from O/spl tilde/(T/sup 3/4/) to O/spl tilde/(T/sup 1/2/). Peter Auer |
FOCS | 1 |
| 1999 | Structural Results About On-line Learning Models With and Without Queries
Peter Auer, Philip M. Long |
Mach. Learn. | 1 |
| 1998 | Approximating Hyper-Rectangles: Learning and Pseudorandom Sets
Peter Auer, Philip M. Long, Aravind Srinivasan |
J. Comput. Syst. Sci. | 1 |
| 1998 | Tracking the Best DisjunctionabstractLittlestone developed a simple deterministic on-line learning algorithm for learning k-literal disjunctions. This algorithm (called $${WINNOW}$$ ) keeps one weight for each of then variables and does multiplicative updates to its weights. We develop a randomized version of $${WINNOW} $$ and prove bounds for an adaptation of the algorithm for the case when the disjunction may change over time. In this case a possible target disjunction schedule $${\mathcal{T}} $$ is a sequence of disjunctions (one per trial) and the shift size is the total number of literals that are added/removed from the disjunctions as one progresses through the sequence. We develop an algorithm that predicts nearly as well as the best disjunction schedule for an arbitrary sequence of examples. This algorithm that allows us to track the predictions of the best disjunction is hardly more complex than the original version. However, the amortized analysis needed for obtaining worst-case mistake bounds requires new techniques. In some cases our lower bounds show that the upper bounds of our algorithm have the right constant in front of the leading term in the mistake bound and almost the right constant in front of the second leading term. Computer experiments support our theoretical findings. Peter Auer, Manfred K. Warmuth |
Mach. Learn. | 1 |
| 1997 | On Learning From Multi-Instance Examples: Empirical Evaluation of a Theoretical Approach
Peter Auer |
ICML | 1 |
| 1997 | Approximating Hyper-Rectangles: Learning and Pseudo-Random SetsabstractThe PAC learning of rectangles has been studied because they have been found experimentally to yield excellent hypotheses for severaf applied learning problems.Also, pseudorandom sets for rectangles have been actively studied recently because (i) they are a subpmblem common to the derandomization of depth-2 (DIW) circuits and derandotnizing Randomized Logspace, and (ii) they approximate the distribution of n independent multivalued random variables.We present improved upper bounds for a class of such problems of "approximating" highdlmensional rectangles that arise in PAC learning and pseudorandomness.Key words and phrases.Rectangles, machine learning, PAC learning, Peter Auer, Philip M. Long, Aravind Srinivasan |
STOC | 1 |
| 1997 | The Perceptron Algorithm Versus Winnow: Linear Versus Logarithmic Mistake Bounds when Few Input Variables are Relevant (Technical Note)
Jyrki Kivinen, Manfred K. Warmuth, Peter Auer |
Artif. Intell. | 3 |
| 1997 | Learning Nested Differences in the Presence of Malicious Noise
Peter Auer |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 1 |
| 1996 | Learning of Depth Two Neural Networks with Constant Fan-In at the Hidden Nodes (Extended Abstract)abstractWe present algorithms for learning neural networks where the hidden depth Peter Auer, Stephen Kwek, Wolfgang Maass 0001, Manfred K. Warmuth |
COLT | 1 |
| 1996 | Tight Bounds on the Cumulative Profit of Distributed Voters (Abstract)abstractNo abstract available. Peter Auer, Pasquale Caianiello, Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi |
PODC | 1 |
| 1995 | Learning Nested Differences in the Presence of Malicious Noise
Peter Auer |
ALT | 1 |
| 1995 | Gambling in a Rigged Casino: The Adversarial Multi-Arm Bandit ProblemabstractIn the multi-armed bandit problem, a gambler must decide which arm of K non-identical slot machines to play in a sequence of trials so as to maximize his reward. This classical problem has received much attention because of the simple model it provides of the trade-off between exploration (trying out each arm to find the best one) and exploitation (playing the arm believed to give the best payoff). Past solutions for the bandit problem have almost always relied on assumptions about the statistics of the slot machines. In this work, we make no statistical assumptions whatsoever about the nature of the process generating the payoffs of the slot machines. We give a solution to the bandit problem in which an adversary, rather than a well-behaved stochastic process, has complete control over the payoffs. In a sequence of T plays, we prove that the expected per-round payoff of our algorithm approaches that of the best arm at the rate O(T/sup -1/3/), and we give an improved rate of convergence when the best arm has fairly low payoff. We also consider a setting in which the player has a team of "experts" advising him on which arm to play; here, we give a strategy that will guarantee expected payoff close to that of the best expert. Finally, we apply our result to the problem of learning to play an unknown repeated matrix game against an all-powerful adversary. Peter Auer, Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi, Yoav Freund, Robert E. Schapire |
FOCS | 1 |
| 1995 | Tracking the Best Disjunction
Peter Auer, Manfred K. Warmuth |
FOCS | 1 |
| 1995 | Theory and Applications of Agnostic PAC-Learning with Small Decision Trees
Peter Auer, Robert C. Holte, Wolfgang Maass 0001 |
ICML | 1 |
| 1995 | Exponentially many local minima for single neurons
Peter Auer, Mark Herbster, Manfred K. Warmuth |
NIPS | 1 |
| 1995 | On the Complexity of Function Learning
Peter Auer, Philip M. Long, Wolfgang Maass 0001, Gerhard J. Woeginger |
Mach. Learn. | 1 |
| 1994 | Simulating access to hidden information while learning
Peter Auer, Philip M. Long |
STOC | 1 |
| 1994 | Degree of Approximation Results for Feedforward Networks Approximating Unknown Mappings and Their DerivativesabstractRecently Barron (1993) has given rates for hidden layer feedforward networks with sigmoid activation functions approximating a class of functions satisfying a certain smoothness condition. These rates do not depend on the dimension of the input space. We extend Barron's results to feedforward networks with possibly nonsigmoid activation functions approximating mappings and their derivatives simultaneously. Our conditions are similar but not identical to Barron's, but we obtain the same rates of approximation, showing that the approximation error decreases at rates as fast as n −1/2 , where n is the number of hidden units. The dimension of the input space appears only in the constants of our bounds. Kurt Hornik, Maxwell B. Stinchcombe, Halbert White, Peter Auer |
Neural Comput. | 4 |
| 1993 | On-Line Learning of Rectangles in Noisy Environments
Peter Auer |
COLT | 1 |
| 1993 | On the Complexity of Function LearningabstractAbstraet. The majority of results in computational learning theory are concerned with concept learning, i.e. with the special case of function learning for classes of functions with range {0, 1}. Much less is known about the theory of learning functions with a larger fange such as Nor IR. In particular relatively few results exist about he general structure of common models for function learning, and there are only very few nontrivial function classes for which positive learning results have been exhibited in any of these models. We introduce in this paper the notion of a binaly branching adversary tree for function learning, which allows us to give a somewhat surprising equivalent characterization f the optimal learning cost for learning a class of real-valued functions (in terms of a max-min definition which does not invoive any "learning " model). Another general structural result of this paper elates the cost for learning a union of function classes to the learning costs for the individual function classes. Furthermore, we exhibit an efficient leaming algorithm for learning convex piecewise linear functions from Rd into IR. Previously, the class of linear functions from 1R d into R was the only class of functions with multi-dimensional domain that was known to be learnable within the rigorous framework of a formal model for on-line leaming. Finally we give a sufficient condition for an arbitrary class 5 ~ of functions from IR into R that allows us to learn the class of all functions that can be written as the pointwise maximum of k functions from 5 r. This allows us to exhibit a number of further nontrivial classes of functions from ~ into R for which there exist eflicient]earning algorithms. Peter Auer, Philip M. Long, Wolfgang Maass 0001, Gerhard J. Woeginger |
COLT | 1 |