Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lev Muchnik

dblp:42/2549 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
0000-0002-5011-8336ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Computational social science and digital humanities · 82% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 18%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Web and social media mining · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational social science and digital humanities
causal inference
0.212014
Design of Randomized Experiments in Networks · Proc. IEEE 2014
Computational social science and digital humanities › online controlled experiments
network experimentation
0.212014
Design of Randomized Experiments in Networks · Proc. IEEE 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
gene regulatory network
0.112006
Copying nodes versus editing links: the source of the difference between genetic regulatory networks and the WWW · Bioinform. 2006
Web and social media mining
online social networks
0.112014
Design of Randomized Experiments in Networks · Proc. IEEE 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology › network bioinformatics › biological network analysis
network comparison
0.012006
Copying nodes versus editing links: the source of the difference between genetic regulatory networks and the WWW · Bioinform. 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

causal inference · 0.4randomized controlled trials · 0.2randomized controlled trial · 0.2network modeling · 0.1duplication-mutation model · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Design of Randomized Experiments in Networks
abstract
Over the last decade, the emergence of pervasive online and digitally enabled environments has created a rich source of detailed data on human behavior. Yet, the promise of big data has recently come under fire for its inability to separate correlation from causation-to derive actionable insights and yield effective policies. Fortunately, the same online platforms on which we interact on a day-to-day basis permit experimentation at large scales, ushering in a new movement toward big experiments. Randomized controlled trials are the heart of the scientific method and when designed correctly provide clean causal inferences that are robust and reproducible. However, the realization that our world is highly connected and that behavioral and economic outcomes at the individual and population level depend upon this connectivity challenges the very principles of experimental design. The proper design and analysis of experiments in networks is, therefore, critically important. In this work, we categorize and review the emerging strategies to design and analyze experiments in networks and discuss their strengths and weaknesses.
Dylan Walker, Lev Muchnik
Proc. IEEE2
2006 Copying nodes versus editing links: the source of the difference between genetic regulatory networks and the WWW
abstract
UNLABELLED: We study two kinds of networks: genetic regulatory networks and the World Wide Web. We systematically test microscopic mechanisms to find the set of such mechanisms that optimally explain each networks' specific properties. In the first case we formulate a model including mainly random unbiased gene duplications and mutations. In the second case, the basic moves are website generation and rapid surf-induced link creation (/destruction). The different types of mechanisms reproduce the appropriate observed network properties. We use those to show that different kinds of networks have strongly system-dependent macroscopic experimental features. The diverging properties result from dissimilar node and link basic dynamics. The main non-uniform properties include the clustering coefficient, small-scale motifs frequency, time correlations, centrality and the connectivity of outgoing links. Some other features are generic such as the large-scale connectivity distribution of incoming links (scale-free) and the network diameter (small-worlds). The common properties are just the general hallmark of autocatalysis (self-enhancing processes), while the specific properties hinge on the specific elementary mechanisms. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics Online.
Yoram Louzoun, Lev Muchnik, Sorin Solomon
Bioinform.2