EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pradeep Yarlagadda
dblp:42/2791 · also Pradeep Krishna Yarlagadda
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
5as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 5 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 4 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Image recognition and object detection · 64% Face, body and person analysis · 22% Segmentation and scene understanding · 14% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.3 | 2 | 2015 | Beyond the Sum of Parts: Voting with Groups of Dependent Entities · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2015 Voting by Grouping Dependent Parts · ECCV (5) 2010 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › human pose estimation
body part dependency modeling |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Beyond the Sum of Parts: Voting with Groups of Dependent Entities · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2015 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection › hough transform
hough voting |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Beyond the Sum of Parts: Voting with Groups of Dependent Entities · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2015 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
part-based object detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Voting by Grouping Dependent Parts · ECCV (5) 2010 |
Image and video processing › image segmentation
contour detection |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | From Meaningful Contours to Discriminative Object Shape · ECCV (1) 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
discriminative shape · 0.3probabilistic hough voting · 0.2joint optimization · 0.2voting · 0.1grouping dependent parts · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | ViNet: Pushing the limits of Visual Modality for Audio-Visual Saliency PredictionabstractWe propose the ViNet architecture for audio-visual saliency prediction. ViNet is a fully convolutional encoder-decoder architecture. The encoder uses visual features from a network trained for action recognition, and the decoder infers a saliency map via trilinear interpolation and 3D convolutions, combining features from multiple hierarchies. The overall architecture of ViNet is conceptually simple; it is causal and runs in real-time (60 fps). ViNet does not use audio as input and still outperforms the state-of-the-art audio-visual saliency prediction models on nine different datasets (three visual-only and six audio-visual datasets). ViNet also surpasses human performance on the CC, SIM and AUC metrics for the AVE dataset, and to our knowledge, it is the first model to do so. We also explore a variation of ViNet architecture by augmenting audio features into the decoder. To our surprise, upon sufficient training, the network becomes agnostic to the input audio and provides the same output irrespective of the input. Interestingly, we also observe similar behaviour in the previous state-of-the-art models [1] for audio-visual saliency prediction. Our findings contrast with previous works on deep learning-based audio-visual saliency prediction, suggesting a clear avenue for future explorations incorporating audio in a more effective manner. The code and pre-trained models are available at https://github.com/samyak0210/ViNet. Samyak Jain, Pradeep Yarlagadda, Shreyank Jyoti, Shyamgopal Karthik, Subramanian Ramanathan, Vineet Gandhi |
IROS | 2 |
| 2020 | Tidying Deep Saliency Prediction ArchitecturesabstractLearning computational models for visual attention (saliency estimation) is an effort to inch machines/robots closer to human visual cognitive abilities. Data-driven efforts have dominated the landscape since the introduction of deep neural network architectures. In deep learning research, the choices in architecture design are often empirical and frequently lead to more complex models than necessary. The complexity, in turn, hinders the application requirements. In this paper, we identify four key components of saliency models, i.e., input features, multi-level integration, readout architecture, and loss functions. We review the existing state of the art models on these four components and propose novel and simpler alternatives. As a result, we propose two novel end-to-end architectures called SimpleNet and MDNSal, which are neater, minimal, more interpretable and achieve state of the art performance on public saliency benchmarks. SimpleNet is an optimized encoder-decoder architecture and brings notable performance gains on the SALICON dataset (the largest saliency benchmark). MDNSal is a parametric model that directly predicts parameters of a GMM distribution and is aimed to bring more interpretability to the prediction maps. The proposed saliency models can be inferred at 25fps, making them suitable for real-time applications. Code and pre-trained models are available at https://github.com/samyak0210/saliency. Navyasri Reddy, Samyak Jain, Pradeep Yarlagadda, Vineet Gandhi |
IROS | 3 |
| 2015 | Beyond the Sum of Parts: Voting with Groups of Dependent EntitiesabstractThe high complexity of multi-scale, category-level object detection in cluttered scenes is efficiently handled by Hough voting methods. However, the main shortcoming of the approach is that mutually dependent local observations are independently casting their votes for intrinsically global object properties such as object scale. Object hypotheses are then assumed to be a mere sum of their part votes. Popular representation schemes are, however, based on a dense sampling of semi-local image features, which are consequently mutually dependent. We take advantage of part dependencies and incorporate them into probabilistic Hough voting by deriving an objective function that connects three intimately related problems: i) grouping mutually dependent parts, ii) solving the correspondence problem conjointly for dependent parts, and iii) finding concerted object hypotheses using extended groups rather than based on local observations alone. Early commitments are avoided by not restricting parts to only a single vote for a locally best correspondence and we learn a weighting of parts during training to reflect their differing relevance for an object. Experiments successfully demonstrate the benefit of incorporating part dependencies through grouping into Hough voting. The joint optimization of groupings, correspondences, and votes not only improves the detection accuracy over standard Hough voting and a sliding window baseline, but it also reduces the computational complexity by significantly decreasing the number of candidate hypotheses. Pradeep Yarlagadda, Björn Ommer |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2012 | Max-Margin Regularization for Reducing Accidentalness in Chamfer Matching
Angela Eigenstetter, Pradeep Yarlagadda, Björn Ommer |
ACCV (1) | 2 |
| 2012 | Learning Discriminative Chamfer RegularizationabstractChamfer matching is an effective and widely used technique for detecting objects or parts thereof by their shape. However, a serious limitation is its susceptibility to background clutter. The primary reason for this is that the presence of individual model points in a query image is measured independently. A match with the object model is then represented by the sum of all the individual model point distance transformations. Consequently, i) all object pixels are treated as being independent and equally relevant, and ii) the model contour (the foreground) is prone to accidental matches with background clutter. As demonstrated by Attneave [1], and various experiments on illusionary contours, object boundary pixels are not all equally important due to their statistical interdependence. Moreover, in dense background clutter the points on the model have a high likelihood to find good spurious matches [1, 3]. However, any arbitrary model would match to such a cluttered region, which consequently gives rise to matches with high accidentalness. Chamfer matching only matches the template contour and thus fails to discount the matching score by the accidentalness, i.e., the likelihood that this is a spurious match. We take account of the fact that boundary pixels are not all equally important by applying a discriminative approach to chamfer distance computation, thereby increasing its robustness. Let T = {ti} and Q = {q j} be the sets of template and query edge map respectively. Let φ(ti) denote the edge orientation of the edge point ti. For a given location x of the template in the query image, directional chamfer matching [2] finds the best q j ∈ Q for each ti ∈ T , thus resulting in a matching cost p (T,Q) i (x). p i (x) = min q j∈Q |(ti +x)−q j|+λ |φ(ti +x)−φ(q j)| (1) Adjacent template pixels are statistically dependent and, thus, we do average (1) over the direct neighbors of pixel i. The resulting pi are then used to learn the importance of contour pixels. While learning the weights for individual pixels improves the robustness of template matching, chamfer matching is still prone to accidental responses in spurious background clutter. To estimate the accidentalness of a match, a small dictionary of simple background contours Tbg is utilized. Rather than placing background contours at a fixed single location, i.e., at the center of the model contour as in [3], background elements are trained to focus at locations where, relative to the foreground, typically accidental matches occur. Let d DCM (x) denote the directional chamfer distance between Q and T with a relative displacement x. To measure where clutter typically interferes with the model contour we compute dbg ) DCM between each background contour Tbg and the object template T . We consider placements of the background contour with better (lower) chamfer matching score to be more important since they occur on or close to the model contour. In order to weight these matching locations higher we create a mask M(Tbg,T )(x) Pradeep Yarlagadda, Angela Eigenstetter, Björn Ommer |
BMVC | 1 |
| 2012 | From Meaningful Contours to Discriminative Object Shape
Pradeep Yarlagadda, Björn Ommer |
ECCV (1) | 1 |
| 2010 | Voting by Grouping Dependent Parts
Pradeep Yarlagadda, Antonio Monroy, Björn Ommer |
ECCV (5) | 1 |
| 2008 | Lie group distance based generic 3-d vehicle classificationabstractThis paper introduces a 3-d representation of vehicles as a space of scale and orientation transformations that define the shape of individual vehicle instances. This shape space forms a group, where the similarity of different vehicle observations can be evaluated using a distance measure defined by Lie group theory. A generic class of vehicles (e.g. SUV) is represented by a set of curves on the Lie group manifold, called geodesics. The classification of any given vehicle instance is achieved by finding the class with the smallest Lie distance between the geodesics and the vehicle shape. Vehicle recognition is carried out on 3-d LIDAR point clouds. The performance of the Lie classifier is evaluated against two other approaches and found to provide superior recognition performance, particularly with respect to the ability to generalize from a small number of labeled prototypes. Pradeep Yarlagadda, Özge Can Özcanli, Joseph L. Mundy |
ICPR | 1 |