Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Igor Kononenko 0001
dblp:42/3099
· DBLP profile ↗
59ranked-venue papers
9as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-1218-2791ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 42 · 7 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 12 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 11 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 4 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 92% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 6% Learning theory · 2% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 71% Information theory · 29% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.3 | 5 | 2010 | An Efficient Explanation of Individual Classifications using Game Theory · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2010 Explaining Classifications For Individual Instances · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2008 Comprehensible Interpretation of Relief's Estimates · ICML 2001 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
feature importance |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Explaining Classifications For Individual Instances · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2008 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
local explanation |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Explaining Classifications For Individual Instances · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2008 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › attribution methods
feature attribution |
0.0 | 2 | 2001 | Comprehensible Interpretation of Relief's Estimates · ICML 2001 An adaptation of Relief for attribute estimation in regression · ICML 1997 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › cooperative game theory › solution concepts
shapley value |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | An Efficient Explanation of Individual Classifications using Game Theory · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2010 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
visualization |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Explaining Classifications For Individual Instances · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2008 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › logic-based explanation › rule-based explanation
decision tree explanation |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Attribute Dependencies, Understandability and Split Selection in Tree Based Models · ICML 1999 |
Data mining › predictive modeling
classification |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Attribute Dependencies, Understandability and Split Selection in Tree Based Models · ICML 1999 |
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
decision tree learning |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Attribute Dependencies, Understandability and Split Selection in Tree Based Models · ICML 1999 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
regression |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | An adaptation of Relief for attribute estimation in regression · ICML 1997 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
game theory · 0.2model-agnostic explanation · 0.1decomposition · 0.1bias estimation · 0.0relief · 0.0stochastic optimization · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Conditional generative positive and unlabeled learningabstractThe quantity of data generated increases daily, which makes it difficult to process. In the case of supervised learning, labeling training examples may represent an especially tedious and costly task. One of the aims of positive and unlabeled (PU) learning is to train a binary classifier from partially labeled data, representing a strategy for combining supervised and semi-supervised learning and alleviating the cost of labeling data fully. Still, the main strength of PU learning arises when the negative data are not directly available or too diverse. Although the generative approaches have shown promising results in this field, they also bring shortcomings, such as high computational cost, training instability, and inability to generate fully labeled datasets. In the paper, we propose a novel Conditional Generative PU framework (CGenPU) with a built-in auxiliary classifier. We develop a novel loss function to learn the distribution of positive and negative examples, which leads to a unique, desirable equilibrium under a nonparametric assumption. Our CGenPU is evaluated against existing generative approaches using both synthetic and real data. The characteristics of various methods, including ours, are depicted with different toy examples. The results demonstrate the state-of-the-art performance on standard positive and unlabeled learning benchmark datasets. Given only ten labeled CIFAR-10 examples, CGenPU achieves classification accuracy of 84%, while current state-of-the-art D-GAN framework achieves 54%. On top of that, CGenPU is the first single-stage generative framework for PU learning. Ales Papic, Igor Kononenko 0001, Zoran Bosnic |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 2 |
| 2023 | SuperFormer: Continual learning superposition method for text classificationabstractOne of the biggest challenges in continual learning domains is the tendency of machine learning models to forget previously learned information over time. While overcoming this issue, the existing approaches often exploit large amounts of additional memory and apply model forgetting mitigation mechanisms which substantially prolong the training process. Therefore, we propose a novel SuperFormer method that alleviates model forgetting, while spending negligible additional memory and time. We tackle the continual learning challenges in a learning scenario, where we learn different tasks in a sequential order. We compare our method against several prominent continual learning methods, i.e., EWC, SI, MAS, GEM, PSP, etc. on a set of text classification tasks. We achieve the best average performance in terms of AUROC and AUPRC (0.7% and 0.9% gain on average, respectively) and the lowest training time among all the methods of comparison. On average, our method reduces the total training time by a factor of 5.4-8.5 in comparison to similarly performing methods. In terms of the additional memory, our method is on par with the most memory-efficient approaches. Marko Zeman, Jana Faganeli Pucer, Igor Kononenko 0001, Zoran Bosnic |
Neural Networks | 3 |
| 2020 | Automatic attribute construction for basketball modelling
Petar Vracar, Erik Strumbelj, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
Knowl. Inf. Syst. | 3 |
| 2019 | Frequent subgraph mining in oceanographic multi-level directed graphsabstractWe present an adaptation and application of frequent subgraph mining (FSM) in a time series of spatial multi-level directed graphs depicting probabilistic transitions of water masses between neighboring sea areas within a given time interval. The directed graphs are created from the results of the numerical model, the Mediterranean Ocean Forecasting System. We assign unique labels (geographical locations) to vertices of the multi-level directed graphs. Then, we add the edge labels as discretized values of the probabilities of transitions between vertices. This modification allows the use of the established algorithm gSpan to search for frequently directed subgraphs in the sequence of such directed graphs. Thus, we obtain both general and specific subgraphs, such as convergences, divergences, and paths of the ocean currents in the numerical model. The resulting substructures, revealed by directed subgraphs, match oceanographic structures (gyres, convergences/divergences, and paths) deduced from field observations, and can also serve as a tool for the validation of the numerical model of circulation in the sea. Boris Petelin, Igor Kononenko 0001, Vlado Malacic, Matjaz Kukar |
Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. | 2 |
| 2016 | Weighted hierarchical archetypal analysis for multi-document summarization
Ercan Canhasi, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
Comput. Speech Lang. | 2 |
| 2016 | Modeling basketball play-by-play data
Petar Vracar, Erik Strumbelj, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 3 |
| 2016 | Closed world specialisation inside the induction processabstractThis paper explores the idea of closed world specialisation (CWS). While traditional CWS is performed as a postprocessing step, we propose two different approaches to incorporating it into the induction process of a bottom-up inductive logic programming system. The motivation comes from the fact th at using CWS as a postprocessing step is incapable of solving problems in which the negated part of the hypothesis is crucial. We apply the proposed approaches to the ProGolem bottom-up ILP system. We give examples of problems, where classical CWS fails to find a complete and consistent solution, whereas the proposed approaches succeed. Tests on real-world datasets show that the proposed approaches perform at least as well as regular CWS, while being better in terms of predictive accuracy in some cases. We also point out some weaknesses of different CWS approaches. Miha Drole, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
Intell. Data Anal. | 2 |
| 2015 | Prediction intervals in supervised learning for model evaluation and discrimination
Darko Pevec, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
Appl. Intell. | 2 |
| 2015 | Dynamic fuzzy paths and cycles in multi-level directed graphs
Boris Petelin, Igor Kononenko 0001, Vlado Malacic, Matjaz Kukar |
Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. | 2 |
| 2014 | Web user profiles with time-decay and prototyping
Domen Kosir, Igor Kononenko 0001, Zoran Bosnic |
Appl. Intell. | 2 |
| 2014 | Enhancing data stream predictions with reliability estimators and explanation
Zoran Bosnic, Jaka Demsar, Grega Kespret, Pedro Pereira Rodrigues, João Gama 0001, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. | 6 |
| 2014 | Weighted archetypal analysis of the multi-element graph for query-focused multi-document summarization
Ercan Canhasi, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 2 |
| 2014 | Input dependent prediction intervals for supervised regressionabstractIn this article we compare and put to test two families of non-parametric approaches to constructing prediction intervals for arbitrary regression models in the supervised learning framework. It is often assumed for the errors to be independent and identically distributed, but we focus on the gener al case when the errors may be input dependent. The first family of approaches is based on the idea of explaining the total prediction error as a sum of the model's error and the error caused by noise inherent to the data, so the two are estimated independently. The second family is based on the assumption of similarity of the data and these approaches estimate the prediction intervals of the target regression variable by using sample's nearest neighbors. Results on a large set of artificial and real-world datasets show that one method from the second family is superior to other methods. Approaches from the first family always form valid, yet not necessarily confirmatory prediction intervals, whereas approaches from the second family prove to be more time efficient. Darko Pevec, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
Intell. Data Anal. | 2 |
| 2014 | Multi-document summarization via Archetypal Analysis of the content-graph joint model
Ercan Canhasi, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
Knowl. Inf. Syst. | 2 |
| 2014 | Explaining prediction models and individual predictions with feature contributions
Erik Strumbelj, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
Knowl. Inf. Syst. | 2 |
| 2013 | Multi-level association rules and directed graphs for spatial data analysis
Boris Petelin, Igor Kononenko 0001, Vlado Malacic, Matjaz Kukar |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 2 |
| 2013 | Efficiently explaining the predictions of a probabilistic radial basis function classification networkabstractA probabilistic radial basis function (PRBF) network is an effective non-linear classifier. However, similar to most other neural network models it is non-transparent, which makes its predictions difficult to interpret. In this paper we show how a one-variable-at-a-time and an all-subsets explanation method can be modified for an equivalent and more efficient use with PRBF network classifiers. We use several artificial and real-life data sets to demonstrate the usefulness of the visualizations and explanations of the PRBF network classifier. Marko Robnik-Sikonja, Erik Strumbelj, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
Intell. Data Anal. | 3 |
| 2012 | Quality of classification explanations with PRBF
Marko Robnik-Sikonja, Igor Kononenko 0001, Erik Strumbelj |
Neurocomputing | 2 |
| 2012 | Mining Data From Hemodynamic Simulations for Generating Prediction and Explanation ModelsabstractOne of the most common causes of human death is stroke, which can be caused by carotid bifurcation stenosis. In our work, we aim at proposing a prototype of a medical expert system that could significantly aid medical experts to detect hemodynamic abnormalities (increased artery wall shear stress). Based on the acquired simulated data, we apply several methodologies for1) predicting magnitudes and locations of maximum wall shear stress in the artery, 2) estimating reliability of computed predictions, and 3) providing user-friendly explanation of the model's decision. The obtained results indicate that the evaluated methodologies can provide a useful tool for the given problem domain. Zoran Bosnic, Petar Vracar, Milos D. Radovic, Goran Devedzic, Nenad Filipovic, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. | 6 |
| 2011 | Modern parameterization and explanation techniques in diagnostic decision support system: A case study in diagnostics of coronary artery disease
Matjaz Kukar, Igor Kononenko 0001, Ciril Groselj |
Artif. Intell. Medicine | 2 |
| 2010 | An Efficient Explanation of Individual Classifications using Game Theory
Erik Strumbelj, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2010 | Explanation and reliability of prediction models: the case of breast cancer recurrence
Erik Strumbelj, Zoran Bosnic, Igor Kononenko 0001, Branko Zakotnik, Cvetka Grasic Kuhar |
Knowl. Inf. Syst. | 3 |
| 2009 | Explaining instance classifications with interactions of subsets of feature values
Erik Strumbelj, Igor Kononenko 0001, Marko Robnik-Sikonja |
Data Knowl. Eng. | 2 |
| 2009 | An overview of advances in reliability estimation of individual predictions in machine learningabstractIn Machine Learning, estimation of the predictive accuracy for a given model is most commonly approached by analyzing the average accuracy of the model. In general, the predictive models do not provide accuracy estimates for their individual predictions. The reliability estimates of individual pred ictions require the analysis of various model and instance properties. In the paper we make an overview of the approaches for estimation of individual prediction reliability. We start by summarizing three research fields, that provided ideas and motivation for our work: (a) approaches to perturbing learning data, (b) the usage of unlabeled data in supervised learning, and (c) the sensitivity analysis. The main part of the paper presents two classes of reliability estimation approaches and summarizes the relevant terminology, which is often used in this and related research fields. Zoran Bosnic, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
Intell. Data Anal. | 2 |
| 2008 | Empirical Analysis of Reliability Estimates for Individual Regression Predictions
Zoran Bosnic, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
DaWaK | 2 |
| 2008 | Towards a Model Independent Method for Explaining Classification for Individual Instances
Erik Strumbelj, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
DaWaK | 2 |
| 2008 | Estimation of individual prediction reliability using the local sensitivity analysis
Zoran Bosnic, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
Appl. Intell. | 2 |
| 2008 | Comparison of approaches for estimating reliability of individual regression predictions
Zoran Bosnic, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
Data Knowl. Eng. | 2 |
| 2008 | Explaining Classifications For Individual InstancesabstractWe present a method for explaining predictions for individual instances. The presented approach is general and can be used with all classification models that output probabilities. It is based on decomposition of a model's predictions on individual contributions of each attribute. Our method works for so called black box models such as support vector machines, neural networks, and nearest neighbor algorithms as well as for ensemble methods, such as boosting and random forests. We demonstrate that the generated explanations closely follow the learned models and present a visualization technique which shows the utility of our approach and enables the comparison of different prediction methods. Marko Robnik-Sikonja, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. | 2 |
| 2006 | Towards symbolic mining of images with association rules: Preliminary results on textures
Matjaz Bevk, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
Intell. Data Anal. | 2 |
| 2005 | Automatic Segmentation of Whole-Body Bone Scintigrams as a Preprocessing Step for Computer Assisted Diagnostics
Luka Sajn, Matjaz Kukar, Igor Kononenko 0001, Metka Milcinski |
AIME | 3 |
| 2005 | GDV Measures Vitality?abstractThe study verifies a hypothesis that GDV in fact measures vitality. For that purpose a limited study was performed and the findings support the hypothesis. However, further investigation is needed in order to more reliably confirm it. Igor Kononenko 0001, Miha Sedej, Aleksander Sadikov |
CBMS | 1 |
| 2005 | Bias and pathology in minimax search
Aleksander Sadikov, Ivan Bratko, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 3 |
| 2003 | Comprehensible evaluation of prognostic factors and prediction of wound healing
Marko Robnik-Sikonja, David Cukjati, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
Artif. Intell. Medicine | 3 |
| 2003 | Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of ReliefF and RReliefF
Marko Robnik-Sikonja, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
Mach. Learn. | 2 |
| 2002 | A Statistical Approach to Texture Description of Medical Images: A Preliminary StudyabstractThe article deals with the problem of texture description. It presents a statistical approach. Specifically, it introduces the use of first- and second-order statistics on texture color spaces. At the end of the article, we also give estimations of the computational time complexities of the parameter calculations presented in this article and describe our experience on one application domain. This study is a preliminary preparation for the application of these methods to medical images. Matjaz Bevk, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
CBMS | 2 |
| 2002 | Reliable Classifications with Machine Learning
Matjaz Kukar, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
ECML | 2 |
| 2001 | Evaluation of Prognostic Factors and Prediction of Chronic Wound Healing Rate by Machine Learning Tools
Marko Robnik-Sikonja, David Cukjati, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
AIME | 3 |
| 2001 | Comprehensible Interpretation of Relief's Estimates
Marko Robnik-Sikonja, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
ICML | 2 |
| 2001 | Machine learning for medical diagnosis: history, state of the art and perspective
Igor Kononenko 0001 |
Artif. Intell. Medicine | 1 |
| 1999 | Attribute Dependencies, Understandability and Split Selection in Tree Based Models
Marko Robnik-Sikonja, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
ICML | 2 |
| 1999 | Analysing and improving the diagnosis of ischaemic heart disease with machine learning
Matjaz Kukar, Igor Kononenko 0001, Ciril Groselj, Katarina Kralj, Jure Fettich |
Artif. Intell. Medicine | 2 |
| 1998 | Cost-Sensitive Learning with Neural Networks
Matjaz Kukar, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
ECAI | 2 |
| 1998 | Pruning Regression Trees with MDL
Marko Robnik-Sikonja, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
ECAI | 2 |
| 1998 | The Minimum Description Length Based Decision Tree Pruning
Igor Kononenko 0001 |
PRICAI | 1 |
| 1998 | Efficient Derivation of the Optimal Assembly Sequence from Product DescriptionabstractThis paper describes the prototype assembly planner, which derives the optimal assembly sequence from a product's specification. Assembly representation used as an input to the planner is based on spatial relationships between parts, which are directly related to the geometry of the assembly move. This way, in addition to the input specification of the product, they can be used for output specification of the necessary assembly moves. The space of all possible assembly sequences is represented by an AND OR graph. The graph is searched for the best sequence using the variant of the AO* heuristic algorithm. The output of the system is the optimal assembly sequence with a description of the required assembly moves. The assembly sequence is, at this stage, evaluated with respect to geometrical feasibility, stability, and parallelism. To cope with the complexity of the implemented approach, we developed efficient algorithms for generating and searching the problem space. Empirical evaluation shows the ability of the system to deal with real-world assemblies. Samo Zorc, D. Noe, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
Cybern. Syst. | 3 |
| 1997 | An Application of Machine Learning in the Diagnosis of Ischaemic Heart Disease
Matjaz Kukar, Ciril Groselj, Igor Kononenko 0001, Jure Fettich |
AIME | 3 |
| 1997 | Machine Learning Applied to Diagnosis of Sport Injuries
Igor Zelic, Igor Kononenko 0001, Nada Lavrac, Vanja Vuga |
AIME | 2 |
| 1997 | An application of machine learning in the diagnosis of ischaemic heart diseaseabstractIschaemic heart disease is one of the world's most important causes of mortality, so improvements and rationalization of diagnostic procedures would be very useful. The four diagnostic levels consist of evaluation of signs and symptoms of the disease and ECG (electrocardiogram) at rest, sequential ECG testing during the controlled exercise, myocardial scintigraphy and finally coronary angiography. The diagnostic process is stepwise and the results are interpreted hierarchically, i.e, the next step is necessary only if the results of the former are inconclusive. Because suggestibility is possible, the results of each step are interpreted individually and only the results of the highest step are valid. On the other hand, machine learning methods may be capable of objective interpretation of all available results for the same patient and in this way increase the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of each step. In the usual setting, the machine learning algorithms are tuned to maximize classification accuracy. In our case, the sensitivity and specificity were much more important, so we generalized the algorithms to take in account the variable misclassification costs. The costs can be tuned in order to bias the algorithms towards higher sensitivity or specificity. We conducted many experiments with four learning algorithms and different variations of our dataset (327 patients with completed diagnostic procedures). Our results show that improvements using machine learning techniques are reasonable and might find good use in practice. Matjaz Kukar, Ciril Groselj, Igor Kononenko 0001, Jure Fettich |
CBMS | 3 |
| 1997 | Diagnosis of sport injuries with machine learning: explanation of induced decisionsabstractMachine learning techniques can be used to extract knowledge from data stored in medical databases. In our application, various machine learning algorithms were used to extract diagnostic knowledge to support decisions in the diagnosis of sport injuries. Igor Zelic, Igor Kononenko 0001, Nada Lavrac, Vanja Vuga |
CBMS | 2 |
| 1997 | An adaptation of Relief for attribute estimation in regression
Marko Robnik-Sikonja, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
ICML | 2 |
| 1997 | Overcoming the Myopia of Inductive Learning Algorithms with RELIEFF
Igor Kononenko 0001, Edvard Simec, Marko Robnik-Sikonja |
Appl. Intell. | 1 |
| 1997 | Attribute selection for modelling
Igor Kononenko 0001, Se June Hong |
Future Gener. Comput. Syst. | 1 |
| 1996 | Machine learning in prognosis of the femoral neck fracture recovery
Matjaz Kukar, Igor Kononenko 0001, T. Silvester |
Artif. Intell. Medicine | 2 |
| 1995 | On Biases in Estimating Multi-Valued Attributes
Igor Kononenko 0001 |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 1994 | Estimating Attributes: Analysis and Extensions of RELIEF
Igor Kononenko 0001 |
ECML | 1 |
| 1992 | Learning as Optimization: Stochastic Generation of Multiple Knowledge
Igor Kononenko 0001, Matevz Kovacic |
ML | 1 |
| 1991 | Information-Based Evaluation Criterion for Classifier's Performance
Igor Kononenko 0001, Ivan Bratko |
Mach. Learn. | 1 |
| 1989 | Medical Analysis of Automatically Induced Diagnostic Rules
Vladimir Pirnat, Igor Kononenko 0001, T. Janc, Ivan Bratko |
AIME | 2 |