Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Doyoung Kim 0001

dblp:42/3152-1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
6since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 6 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Language models and text generation · 68% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 24% Efficient and distributed learning · 8%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction tuning
1.322023
Exploring the Benefits of Training Expert Language Models over Instruction Tuning · ICML 2023
The CoT Collection: Improving Zero-shot and Few-shot Learning of Language Models via Chain-of-Thought Fine-Tuning · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › alignment
alignment evaluation
0.812024
FLASK: Fine-grained Language Model Evaluation based on Alignment Skill Sets · ICLR 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.812024
FLASK: Fine-grained Language Model Evaluation based on Alignment Skill Sets · ICLR 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model training
0.812024
Semiparametric Token-Sequence Co-Supervision · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › chain-of-thought reasoning
chain-of-thought tuning
0.712023
The CoT Collection: Improving Zero-shot and Few-shot Learning of Language Models via Chain-of-Thought Fine-Tuning · EMNLP 2023
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
cross-task transfer
0.712023
Exploring the Benefits of Training Expert Language Models over Instruction Tuning · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
few-shot learning
0.712023
The CoT Collection: Improving Zero-shot and Few-shot Learning of Language Models via Chain-of-Thought Fine-Tuning · EMNLP 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model merging
0.712023
Exploring the Benefits of Training Expert Language Models over Instruction Tuning · ICML 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › instruction tuning
multitask-prompted fine-tuning
0.712023
Exploring the Benefits of Training Expert Language Models over Instruction Tuning · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
zero-shot learning
0.712023
Guess the Instruction! Flipped Learning Makes Language Models Stronger Zero-Shot Learners · ICLR 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

instruction tuning · 2.0skill-set decomposition · 0.8semiparametric modeling · 0.8model-based evaluation · 0.8human-based evaluation · 0.8zero-shot inference · 0.7flipped learning · 0.7chain-of-thought prompting · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Semiparametric Token-Sequence Co-Supervision
abstract
Hyunji Lee, Doyoung Kim, Jihoon Jun, Se June Joo, Joel Jang, Kyoung-Woon On, Minjoon Seo. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Hyunji Lee, Doyoung Kim 0001, Jihoon Jun, Se June Joo, Joel Jang, Kyoung-Woon On, Minjoon Seo
ACL (1)2
2024 FLASK: Fine-grained Language Model Evaluation based on Alignment Skill Sets
abstract
Evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) is challenging because instruction-following necessitates alignment with human values and the required set of skills varies depending on the instruction. However, previous studies have mainly focused on coarse-grained evaluation (i.e. overall preference-based evaluation), which limits interpretability since it does not consider the nature of user instructions that require instance-wise skill composition. In this paper, we introduce FLASK (Fine-grained Language Model Evaluation based on Alignment Skill Sets), a fine-grained evaluation protocol for both human-based and model-based evaluation which decomposes coarse-level scoring to a skill set-level scoring for each instruction. We experimentally observe that the fine-graininess of evaluation is crucial for attaining a holistic view of model performance and increasing the reliability of the evaluation. Using FLASK, we compare multiple open-source and proprietary LLMs and observe a high correlation between model-based and human-based evaluations.
Seonghyeon Ye, Doyoung Kim 0001, Sungdong Kim, Hyeonbin Hwang, Seungone Kim, Yongrae Jo, James Thorne, Juho Kim 0001, Minjoon Seo
ICLR2
2024 How Well Do Large Language Models Truly Ground?
abstract
Hyunji Lee, Se June Joo, Chaeeun Kim, Joel Jang, Doyoung Kim, Kyoung-Woon On, Minjoon Seo. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Hyunji Lee, Se June Joo, Chaeeun Kim, Joel Jang, Doyoung Kim 0001, Kyoung-Woon On, Minjoon Seo
NAACL-HLT5
2023 The CoT Collection: Improving Zero-shot and Few-shot Learning of Language Models via Chain-of-Thought Fine-Tuning
abstract
Language models (LMs) with less than 100B parameters are known to perform poorly on chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning in contrast to large LMs when solving unseen tasks.In this work, we aim to equip smaller LMs with the step-by-step reasoning capability by instruction tuning with CoT rationales.In order to achieve this goal, we first introduce a new instructiontuning dataset called the COT COLLECTION, which augments the existing Flan Collection (including only 9 CoT tasks) with additional 1.84 million rationales across 1,060 tasks.We show that CoT fine-tuning Flan-T5 (3B & 11B) with COT COLLECTION enables smaller LMs to have better CoT capabilities on unseen tasks.On the BIG-Bench-Hard (BBH) benchmark, we report an average improvement of +4.34% (Flan-T5 3B) and +2.60% (Flan-T5 11B), in terms of zero-shot task accuracy.Furthermore, we show that instruction tuning with COT COL-LECTION allows LMs to possess stronger fewshot learning capabilities on 4 domain-specific tasks, resulting in an improvement of +2.24% (Flan-T5 3B) and +2.37% (Flan-T5 11B), even outperforming ChatGPT utilizing demonstrations until the max length by a +13.98% margin.Our code, the COT COLLECTION data, and model checkpoints are publicly available 1 .
Seungone Kim, Se June Joo, Doyoung Kim 0001, Joel Jang, Seonghyeon Ye, Jamin Shin, Minjoon Seo
EMNLP3
2023 Guess the Instruction! Flipped Learning Makes Language Models Stronger Zero-Shot Learners
Seonghyeon Ye, Doyoung Kim 0001, Joel Jang, Joongbo Shin, Minjoon Seo
ICLR2
2023 Exploring the Benefits of Training Expert Language Models over Instruction Tuning
abstract
Recently, Language Models (LMs) instruction-tuned on multiple tasks, also known as multitask-prompted fine-tuning (MT), have shown capabilities to generalize to unseen tasks. Previous work has shown that scaling the number of finetuning datasets and instructions is the key component in making stronger MT LMs. In this work, we report surprising findings that show an expert LM trained on just a single task can outperform an MT LM trained with 300+ different tasks on 11 different unseen datasets and on 13 datasets of the BIG-bench benchmark by an average of 3.20% and 1.29%, respectively. This finding casts doubt on the previously held belief that simply scaling the number of tasks makes stronger MT LMs. Leveraging this finding, we further show that this distributed approach of training multiple expert LMs instead of a single MT LM for zero-shot inference possesses many benefits including (1) avoiding negative task transfer that often occurs during instruction tuning, (2) being able to continually learn new tasks without having to re-train on previous tasks to avoid catastrophic forgetting, and (3) showing compositional capabilities when merging individual experts together.
Joel Jang, Seungone Kim, Seonghyeon Ye, Doyoung Kim 0001, Lajanugen Logeswaran, Moontae Lee, Kyungjae Lee 0002, Minjoon Seo
ICML4