Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pratap S. Khedkar

dblp:42/3579 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 52% Deep learning architectures and training · 33% Optimization for machine learning · 16%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › intelligent control
fuzzy control
0.021999
Hybrid soft computing systems: industrial and commercial applications · Proc. IEEE 1999
Industrial applications of fuzzy logic at General Electric · Proc. IEEE 1995
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
evolutionary computation
0.011999
Hybrid soft computing systems: industrial and commercial applications · Proc. IEEE 1999

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

fuzzy logic · 0.0probabilistic computing · 0.0neural network · 0.0evolutionary computing · 0.0supervised learning · 0.0steepest descent · 0.0rule clustering · 0.0reinforcement learning · 0.0genetic algorithm · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1999 Hybrid soft computing systems: industrial and commercial applications
abstract
Soft computing (SC) is an association of computing methodologies that includes as its principal members fuzzy logic, neurocomputing, evolutionary computing and probabilistic computing. We present a collection of methods and tools that can be used to perform diagnostics, estimation, and control. These tools are a great match for real-world applications that are characterized by imprecise, uncertain data and incomplete domain knowledge. We outline the advantages of applying SC techniques and in particular the synergy derived from the use of hybrid SC systems. We illustrate some combinations of hybrid SC systems, such as fuzzy logic controllers (FLCs) tuned by neural networks (NNs) and evolutionary computing (EC), NNs tuned by EC or FLCs, and EC controlled by FLCs. We discuss three successful real-world examples of SC applications to industrial equipment diagnostics, freight train control, and residential property valuation.
Piero P. Bonissone, Yu-To Chen, Kai Goebel, Pratap S. Khedkar
Proc. IEEE4
1998 Using fuzzy logic for performance evaluation in reinforcement learning
Hamid R. Berenji, Pratap S. Khedkar
Int. J. Approx. Reason.2
1995 Industrial applications of fuzzy logic at General Electric
abstract
Fuzzy logic control (FLC) technology has drastically reduced the development time and deployment cost for the synthesis of nonlinear controllers for dynamic systems. As a result we have experienced an increased number of FLC applications. We illustrate some of our efforts in FLC technology transfer, covering projects in turboshaft aircraft engine control, steam turbine startup, steam turbine cycling optimization, resonant converter power supply control, and data-induced modeling of the nonlinear relationship between process variables in a rolling mill stand. We compare these applications in a cost/complexity framework, and examine the driving factors that led to the use of FLCs in each application. We emphasize the role of fuzzy logic in developing supervisory controllers and in maintaining explicit tradeoff criteria used to manage multiple control strategies. Finally, we describe some of our FLC technology research efforts in automatic rule base tuning and generation, leading to a suite of programs for reinforcement learning, supervised learning, genetic algorithms, steepest descent algorithms, and rule clustering.>
Piero P. Bonissone, Vivek V. Badami, Kenneth H. Chiang, Pratap S. Khedkar, Kenneth W. Marcelle, Michael J. Schutten
Proc. IEEE4
1992 Learning and tuning fuzzy logic controllers through reinforcements
abstract
A method for learning and tuning a fuzzy logic controller based on reinforcements from a dynamic system is presented. It is shown that: the generalized approximate-reasoning-based intelligent control (GARIC) architecture learns and tunes a fuzzy logic controller even when only weak reinforcement, such as a binary failure signal, is available; introduces a new conjunction operator in computing the rule strengths of fuzzy control rules; introduces a new localized mean of maximum (LMOM) method in combining the conclusions of several firing control rules; and learns to produce real-valued control actions. Learning is achieved by integrating fuzzy inference into a feedforward network, which can then adaptively improve performance by using gradient descent methods. The GARIC architecture is applied to a cart-pole balancing system and demonstrates significant improvements in terms of the speed of learning and robustness to changes in the dynamic system's parameters over previous schemes for cart-pole balancing.
Hamid R. Berenji, Pratap S. Khedkar
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks2