Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pratap S. Khedkar
dblp:42/3579
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 52% Deep learning architectures and training · 33% Optimization for machine learning · 16% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › intelligent control
fuzzy control |
0.0 | 2 | 1999 | Hybrid soft computing systems: industrial and commercial applications · Proc. IEEE 1999 Industrial applications of fuzzy logic at General Electric · Proc. IEEE 1995 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
evolutionary computation |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Hybrid soft computing systems: industrial and commercial applications · Proc. IEEE 1999 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
fuzzy logic · 0.0probabilistic computing · 0.0neural network · 0.0evolutionary computing · 0.0supervised learning · 0.0steepest descent · 0.0rule clustering · 0.0reinforcement learning · 0.0genetic algorithm · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1999 | Hybrid soft computing systems: industrial and commercial applicationsabstractSoft computing (SC) is an association of computing methodologies that includes as its principal members fuzzy logic, neurocomputing, evolutionary computing and probabilistic computing. We present a collection of methods and tools that can be used to perform diagnostics, estimation, and control. These tools are a great match for real-world applications that are characterized by imprecise, uncertain data and incomplete domain knowledge. We outline the advantages of applying SC techniques and in particular the synergy derived from the use of hybrid SC systems. We illustrate some combinations of hybrid SC systems, such as fuzzy logic controllers (FLCs) tuned by neural networks (NNs) and evolutionary computing (EC), NNs tuned by EC or FLCs, and EC controlled by FLCs. We discuss three successful real-world examples of SC applications to industrial equipment diagnostics, freight train control, and residential property valuation. Piero P. Bonissone, Yu-To Chen, Kai Goebel, Pratap S. Khedkar |
Proc. IEEE | 4 |
| 1998 | Using fuzzy logic for performance evaluation in reinforcement learning
Hamid R. Berenji, Pratap S. Khedkar |
Int. J. Approx. Reason. | 2 |
| 1995 | Industrial applications of fuzzy logic at General ElectricabstractFuzzy logic control (FLC) technology has drastically reduced the development time and deployment cost for the synthesis of nonlinear controllers for dynamic systems. As a result we have experienced an increased number of FLC applications. We illustrate some of our efforts in FLC technology transfer, covering projects in turboshaft aircraft engine control, steam turbine startup, steam turbine cycling optimization, resonant converter power supply control, and data-induced modeling of the nonlinear relationship between process variables in a rolling mill stand. We compare these applications in a cost/complexity framework, and examine the driving factors that led to the use of FLCs in each application. We emphasize the role of fuzzy logic in developing supervisory controllers and in maintaining explicit tradeoff criteria used to manage multiple control strategies. Finally, we describe some of our FLC technology research efforts in automatic rule base tuning and generation, leading to a suite of programs for reinforcement learning, supervised learning, genetic algorithms, steepest descent algorithms, and rule clustering.> Piero P. Bonissone, Vivek V. Badami, Kenneth H. Chiang, Pratap S. Khedkar, Kenneth W. Marcelle, Michael J. Schutten |
Proc. IEEE | 4 |
| 1992 | Learning and tuning fuzzy logic controllers through reinforcementsabstractA method for learning and tuning a fuzzy logic controller based on reinforcements from a dynamic system is presented. It is shown that: the generalized approximate-reasoning-based intelligent control (GARIC) architecture learns and tunes a fuzzy logic controller even when only weak reinforcement, such as a binary failure signal, is available; introduces a new conjunction operator in computing the rule strengths of fuzzy control rules; introduces a new localized mean of maximum (LMOM) method in combining the conclusions of several firing control rules; and learns to produce real-valued control actions. Learning is achieved by integrating fuzzy inference into a feedforward network, which can then adaptively improve performance by using gradient descent methods. The GARIC architecture is applied to a cart-pole balancing system and demonstrates significant improvements in terms of the speed of learning and robustness to changes in the dynamic system's parameters over previous schemes for cart-pole balancing. Hamid R. Berenji, Pratap S. Khedkar |
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks | 2 |