Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jr-Jen Huang

dblp:42/4760 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Information theory · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing › image filtering
nonlinear filtering
0.011999
A fast algorithm for designing stack filters · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1999
Image and video processing › image filtering › nonlinear filtering
stack filter
0.011999
A fast algorithm for designing stack filters · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1999
Information theory › signal processing
adaptive filtering
0.011999
A fast algorithm for designing stack filters · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1999
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel computing
parallel implementation
0.011999
A fast algorithm for designing stack filters · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1999

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

threshold decomposition · 0.1adaptive algorithm · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Fast Iris localization using Haar-like features and AdaBoost algorithm
Yi-Nan Lin, Tsang-Yen Hsieh, Jr-Jen Huang, Cheng-Ying Yang, Victor R. L. Shen, Hai Hoang Bui
Multim. Tools Appl.3
1999 A fast algorithm for designing stack filters
abstract
Stack filters are a class of nonlinear filters with excellent properties for signal restoration. Unfortunately, present algorithms for designing stack filters can only be used for small window sizes because of either their computational overhead or their serial nature. This paper presents a new adaptive algorithm for determining a stack filter that minimizes the mean absolute error criterion. The new algorithm retains the iterative nature of many current adaptive stack filtering algorithms, but significantly reduces the number of iterations required to converge to an optimal filter. This algorithm is faster than all currently available stack filter design algorithms, is simple to implement, and is shown in this paper to always converge to an optimal stack filter. Extensive comparisons between this new algorithm and all existing algorithms are provided. The comparisons are based both on the performance of the resulting filters and upon the time and space complexity of the algorithms. They demonstrate that the new algorithm has three advantages: it is faster than all other available algorithms; it can be used on standard workstations (SPARC 5 with 48 MB) to design filters with windows containing 20 or more points; and, its highly parallel structure allows very fast implementations on parallel machines. This new algorithm allows cascades of stack filters to be designed; stack filters with windows containing 72 points have been designed in a matter of minutes under this new approach.
Jisang Yoo, Kevin L. Fong, Jr-Jen Huang, Edward J. Coyle, George B. Adams III
IEEE Trans. Image Process.3
1998 Perceptually optimal restoration of images with stack filters
abstract
The present approach to the MAE-based design of stack filters for image restoration does not always produce the desired visual result. Thus, in this paper, a new stack filter design algorithm is developed. It is based upon a weighted mean absolute error (WMAE) criterion instead of the traditional MAE criterion, which assigns the same weights to all errors. The weights in this WMAE criterion are designed with the aid of the visible differences predictor (VDP), which can estimate the sensitivity of the human visual system to changes in images. Experiments with this WMAE approach show that the stack filters it produces perform significantly better in image processing applications than those designed with the MAE approach.
Jr-Jen Huang, Edward J. Coyle
ICASSP1
1998 Perceptual Error Criteria and Restoration of Images with Stack Filters
abstract
The present approach to the MAE-based design of stack filters for image restoration does not always produce the desired visual result. Thus, in this paper, a new stack filter design algorithm is developed. It is based upon a weighted mean absolute error (WMAE) criterion instead of the traditional MAE criterion that assigns the same weights to all errors. The weights in the WMAE criterion are designed with the visible differences predictor (VDP), which can estimate the sensitivity of the human visual system to changes in images. Experiments with this WMAE approach show that the stack filters it produces perform significantly better in image processing applications than those designed with the MAE approach.
Jr-Jen Huang, Edward J. Coyle
ICIP (2)1