EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Debra Brodbeck
dblp:42/5409
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Concurrent programming · 44% Program analysis · 44% Requirements engineering and software design · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Concurrent programming
concurrency analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | A Concurrency Analysis Tool Suite for Ada Programs: Rational, Design, and Preliminary Experience · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 1995 |
Program analysis › static analysis
static analysis tools |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | A Concurrency Analysis Tool Suite for Ada Programs: Rational, Design, and Preliminary Experience · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 1995 |
Requirements engineering and software design › computer-aided software engineering
tool integration |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | A Concurrency Analysis Tool Suite for Ada Programs: Rational, Design, and Preliminary Experience · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 1995 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
concurrency analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1995 | A Concurrency Analysis Tool Suite for Ada Programs: Rational, Design, and Preliminary ExperienceabstractCats (Concurrency Analysis Tool Suite) is designed to satisfy several criteria: it must analyze implementation-level Ada source code and check user-specified conditions associated with program source code; it must be modularized in a fashion that supports flexible composition with other tool components, including integration with a variety of testing and analysis techniques; and its performance and capacity must be sufficient for analysis of real application programs. Meeting these objectives together is significantly more difficult than meeting any of them alone. We describe the design and rationale of Cats and report experience with an implementation. The issues addressed here are primarily practical concerns for modularizing and integrating tools for analysis of actual source programs. We also report successful application of Cats to major subsystems of a (nontoy) highly concurrent user interface system. Michal Young, Richard N. Taylor, David L. Levine, Kari A. Nies, Debra Brodbeck |
ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. | 5 |