Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David L. Wild
dblp:42/6171
· DBLP profile ↗
18ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 16Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
13 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 97% Computational science and engineering · 2% Medical and health informatics · 2% |
Topics — the 22 heaviest of 23, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology › network inference
gene regulatory network inference |
0.5 | 4 | 2015 | Inferring orthologous gene regulatory networks using interspecies data fusion · Bioinform. 2015 Nonparametric Bayesian inference for perturbed and orthologous gene regulatory networks · Bioinform. 2012 A Bayesian approach to reconstructing genetic regulatory networks with hidden factors · Bioinform. 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology › network inference › gene regulatory network inference
bayesian network inference |
0.4 | 2 | 2015 | Inferring orthologous gene regulatory networks using interspecies data fusion · Bioinform. 2015 Nonparametric Bayesian inference for perturbed and orthologous gene regulatory networks · Bioinform. 2012 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction |
0.2 | 3 | 2013 | Predicting protein β-sheet contacts using a maximum entropy-based correlated mutation measure · Bioinform. 2013 A graphical model for protein secondary structure prediction · ICML 2004 A Bayesian network model for protein fold and remote homologue recognition · Bioinform. 2002 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
residue contact prediction |
0.2 | 2 | 2013 | Predicting protein β-sheet contacts using a maximum entropy-based correlated mutation measure · Bioinform. 2013 A graphical model for protein secondary structure prediction · ICML 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › data integration
multi-dataset integration |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Bayesian correlated clustering to integrate multiple datasets · Bioinform. 2012 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
systems biology |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Bayesian correlated clustering to integrate multiple datasets · Bioinform. 2012 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.1 | 2 | 2010 | A Robust Bayesian Two-Sample Test for Detecting Intervals of Differential Gene Expression in Microarray Time Series · RECOMB 2009 Discovering transcriptional modules by Bayesian data integration · Bioinform. 2010 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › data integration
bayesian data integration |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Discovering transcriptional modules by Bayesian data integration · Bioinform. 2010 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
regulatory genomics |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Discovering transcriptional modules by Bayesian data integration · Bioinform. 2010 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
differential expression analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | A Robust Bayesian Two-Sample Test for Detecting Intervals of Differential Gene Expression in Microarray Time Series · RECOMB 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
time-series gene expression analysis |
0.1 | 2 | 2015 | Inferring orthologous gene regulatory networks using interspecies data fusion · Bioinform. 2015 A Bayesian approach to reconstructing genetic regulatory networks with hidden factors · Bioinform. 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
biomarker discovery |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Biomarker discovery in microarray gene expression data with Gaussian processes · Bioinform. 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
gene selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Biomarker discovery in microarray gene expression data with Gaussian processes · Bioinform. 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › microarray data analysis
microarray gene expression analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Biomarker discovery in microarray gene expression data with Gaussian processes · Bioinform. 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular evolution
correlated mutation analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Predicting protein β-sheet contacts using a maximum entropy-based correlated mutation measure · Bioinform. 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
secondary structure prediction |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | A graphical model for protein secondary structure prediction · ICML 2004 |
Computational science and engineering › time series analysis
state-space model |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Modeling T-cell activation using gene expression profiling and state-space models · Bioinform. 2004 |
Medical and health informatics
genomic medicine |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Bayesian correlated clustering to integrate multiple datasets · Bioinform. 2012 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction › template-based modeling
fold recognition |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | A Bayesian network model for protein fold and remote homologue recognition · Bioinform. 2002 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › homology detection
remote homology detection |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | A Bayesian network model for protein fold and remote homologue recognition · Bioinform. 2002 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Protein analyst - a distributed object environment for protein sequence and structure analysis · Bioinform. 1999 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics
protein structure classification |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | A Bayesian network model for protein fold and remote homologue recognition · Bioinform. 2002 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gaussian process · 0.4graph kernel · 0.2bayesian hierarchical model · 0.2probabilistic modeling · 0.2maximum entropy · 0.2contrastive divergence · 0.2bayesian inference · 0.1hierarchical modeling · 0.1dirichlet-multinomial allocation · 0.1bayesian mixture model · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Bringing numerous methods for expression and promoter analysis to a public cloud computing serviceabstractSummary: Every year, a large number of novel algorithms are introduced to the scientific community for a myriad of applications, but using these across different research groups is often troublesome, due to suboptimal implementations and specific dependency requirements. This does not have to be the case, as public cloud computing services can easily house tractable implementations within self-contained dependency environments, making the methods easily accessible to a wider public. We have taken 14 popular methods, the majority related to expression data or promoter analysis, developed these up to a good implementation standard and housed the tools in isolated Docker containers which we integrated into the CyVerse Discovery Environment, making these easily usable for a wide community as part of the CyVerse UK project. Availability and implementation: The integrated apps can be found at http://www.cyverse.org/discovery-environment, while the raw code is available at https://github.com/cyversewarwick and the corresponding Docker images are housed at https://hub.docker.com/r/cyversewarwick/. Contact: [email protected] or [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Krzysztof Polanski, Bo Gao 0001, Sam A. Mason, Paul Brown, Sascha Ott, Katherine J. Denby, David L. Wild |
Bioinform. | 7 |
| 2015 | Inferring orthologous gene regulatory networks using interspecies data fusionabstractMOTIVATION: The ability to jointly learn gene regulatory networks (GRNs) in, or leverage GRNs between related species would allow the vast amount of legacy data obtained in model organisms to inform the GRNs of more complex, or economically or medically relevant counterparts. Examples include transferring information from Arabidopsis thaliana into related crop species for food security purposes, or from mice into humans for medical applications. Here we develop two related Bayesian approaches to network inference that allow GRNs to be jointly inferred in, or leveraged between, several related species: in one framework, network information is directly propagated between species; in the second hierarchical approach, network information is propagated via an unobserved 'hypernetwork'. In both frameworks, information about network similarity is captured via graph kernels, with the networks additionally informed by species-specific time series gene expression data, when available, using Gaussian processes to model the dynamics of gene expression. RESULTS: Results on in silico benchmarks demonstrate that joint inference, and leveraging of known networks between species, offers better accuracy than standalone inference. The direct propagation of network information via the non-hierarchical framework is more appropriate when there are relatively few species, while the hierarchical approach is better suited when there are many species. Both methods are robust to small amounts of mislabelling of orthologues. Finally, the use of Saccharomyces cerevisiae data and networks to inform inference of networks in the budding yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe predicts a novel role in cell cycle regulation for Gas1 (SPAC19B12.02c), a 1,3-beta-glucanosyltransferase. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: MATLAB code is available from http://go.warwick.ac.uk/systemsbiology/software/. Christopher A. Penfold, Jonathan B. A. Millar, David L. Wild |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2013 | Predicting protein β-sheet contacts using a maximum entropy-based correlated mutation measureabstractMOTIVATION: The problem of ab initio protein folding is one of the most difficult in modern computational biology. The prediction of residue contacts within a protein provides a more tractable immediate step. Recently introduced maximum entropy-based correlated mutation measures (CMMs), such as direct information, have been successful in predicting residue contacts. However, most correlated mutation studies focus on proteins that have large good-quality multiple sequence alignments (MSA) because the power of correlated mutation analysis falls as the size of the MSA decreases. However, even with small autogenerated MSAs, maximum entropy-based CMMs contain information. To make use of this information, in this article, we focus not on general residue contacts but contacts between residues in β-sheets. The strong constraints and prior knowledge associated with β-contacts are ideally suited for prediction using a method that incorporates an often noisy CMM. RESULTS: Using contrastive divergence, a statistical machine learning technique, we have calculated a maximum entropy-based CMM. We have integrated this measure with a new probabilistic model for β-contact prediction, which is used to predict both residue- and strand-level contacts. Using our model on a standard non-redundant dataset, we significantly outperform a 2D recurrent neural network architecture, achieving a 5% improvement in true positives at the 5% false-positive rate at the residue level. At the strand level, our approach is competitive with the state-of-the-art single methods achieving precision of 61.0% and recall of 55.4%, while not requiring residue solvent accessibility as an input. AVAILABILITY: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/systemsbiology/research/software/ Nikolas S. Burkoff, Csilla Várnai, David L. Wild |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2012 | Bayesian correlated clustering to integrate multiple datasetsabstractMOTIVATION: The integration of multiple datasets remains a key challenge in systems biology and genomic medicine. Modern high-throughput technologies generate a broad array of different data types, providing distinct-but often complementary-information. We present a Bayesian method for the unsupervised integrative modelling of multiple datasets, which we refer to as MDI (Multiple Dataset Integration). MDI can integrate information from a wide range of different datasets and data types simultaneously (including the ability to model time series data explicitly using Gaussian processes). Each dataset is modelled using a Dirichlet-multinomial allocation (DMA) mixture model, with dependencies between these models captured through parameters that describe the agreement among the datasets. RESULTS: Using a set of six artificially constructed time series datasets, we show that MDI is able to integrate a significant number of datasets simultaneously, and that it successfully captures the underlying structural similarity between the datasets. We also analyse a variety of real Saccharomyces cerevisiae datasets. In the two-dataset case, we show that MDI's performance is comparable with the present state-of-the-art. We then move beyond the capabilities of current approaches and integrate gene expression, chromatin immunoprecipitation-chip and protein-protein interaction data, to identify a set of protein complexes for which genes are co-regulated during the cell cycle. Comparisons to other unsupervised data integration techniques-as well as to non-integrative approaches-demonstrate that MDI is competitive, while also providing information that would be difficult or impossible to extract using other methods. Paul D. W. Kirk, Jim E. Griffin, Richard S. Savage, Zoubin Ghahramani, David L. Wild |
Bioinform. | 5 |
| 2012 | Nonparametric Bayesian inference for perturbed and orthologous gene regulatory networksabstractMOTIVATION: The generation of time series transcriptomic datasets collected under multiple experimental conditions has proven to be a powerful approach for disentangling complex biological processes, allowing for the reverse engineering of gene regulatory networks (GRNs). Most methods for reverse engineering GRNs from multiple datasets assume that each of the time series were generated from networks with identical topology. In this study, we outline a hierarchical, non-parametric Bayesian approach for reverse engineering GRNs using multiple time series that can be applied in a number of novel situations including: (i) where different, but overlapping sets of transcription factors are expected to bind in the different experimental conditions; that is, where switching events could potentially arise under the different treatments and (ii) for inference in evolutionary related species in which orthologous GRNs exist. More generally, the method can be used to identify context-specific regulation by leveraging time series gene expression data alongside methods that can identify putative lists of transcription factors or transcription factor targets. RESULTS: The hierarchical inference outperforms related (but non-hierarchical) approaches when the networks used to generate the data were identical, and performs comparably even when the networks used to generate data were independent. The method was subsequently used alongside yeast one hybrid and microarray time series data to infer potential transcriptional switches in Arabidopsis thaliana response to stress. The results confirm previous biological studies and allow for additional insights into gene regulation under various abiotic stresses. AVAILABILITY: The methods outlined in this article have been implemented in Matlab and are available on request. Christopher A. Penfold, Vicky Buchanan-Wollaston, Katherine J. Denby, David L. Wild |
Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2011 | Bayesian hierarchical clustering for microarray time series data with replicates and outlier measurementsabstractBACKGROUND: Post-genomic molecular biology has resulted in an explosion of data, providing measurements for large numbers of genes, proteins and metabolites. Time series experiments have become increasingly common, necessitating the development of novel analysis tools that capture the resulting data structure. Outlier measurements at one or more time points present a significant challenge, while potentially valuable replicate information is often ignored by existing techniques. RESULTS: We present a generative model-based Bayesian hierarchical clustering algorithm for microarray time series that employs Gaussian process regression to capture the structure of the data. By using a mixture model likelihood, our method permits a small proportion of the data to be modelled as outlier measurements, and adopts an empirical Bayes approach which uses replicate observations to inform a prior distribution of the noise variance. The method automatically learns the optimum number of clusters and can incorporate non-uniformly sampled time points. Using a wide variety of experimental data sets, we show that our algorithm consistently yields higher quality and more biologically meaningful clusters than current state-of-the-art methodologies. We highlight the importance of modelling outlier values by demonstrating that noisy genes can be grouped with other genes of similar biological function. We demonstrate the importance of including replicate information, which we find enables the discrimination of additional distinct expression profiles. CONCLUSIONS: By incorporating outlier measurements and replicate values, this clustering algorithm for time series microarray data provides a step towards a better treatment of the noise inherent in measurements from high-throughput genomic technologies. Timeseries BHC is available as part of the R package 'BHC' (version 1.5), which is available for download from Bioconductor (version 2.9 and above) via http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/BHC.html?pagewanted=all. Emma J. Cooke, Richard S. Savage, Paul D. W. Kirk, Robert Darkins, David L. Wild |
BMC Bioinform. | 5 |
| 2010 | Discovering transcriptional modules by Bayesian data integrationabstractMOTIVATION: We present a method for directly inferring transcriptional modules (TMs) by integrating gene expression and transcription factor binding (ChIP-chip) data. Our model extends a hierarchical Dirichlet process mixture model to allow data fusion on a gene-by-gene basis. This encodes the intuition that co-expression and co-regulation are not necessarily equivalent and hence we do not expect all genes to group similarly in both datasets. In particular, it allows us to identify the subset of genes that share the same structure of transcriptional modules in both datasets. RESULTS: We find that by working on a gene-by-gene basis, our model is able to extract clusters with greater functional coherence than existing methods. By combining gene expression and transcription factor binding (ChIP-chip) data in this way, we are better able to determine the groups of genes that are most likely to represent underlying TMs. AVAILABILITY: If interested in the code for the work presented in this article, please contact the authors. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Richard S. Savage, Zoubin Ghahramani, Jim E. Griffin, Bernard J. de la Cruz, David L. Wild |
Bioinform. | 5 |
| 2009 | A Robust Bayesian Two-Sample Test for Detecting Intervals of Differential Gene Expression in Microarray Time Series
Oliver Stegle, Katherine J. Denby, David L. Wild, Zoubin Ghahramani, Karsten M. Borgwardt |
RECOMB | 3 |
| 2009 | R/BHC: fast Bayesian hierarchical clustering for microarray dataabstractBACKGROUND: Although the use of clustering methods has rapidly become one of the standard computational approaches in the literature of microarray gene expression data analysis, little attention has been paid to uncertainty in the results obtained. RESULTS: We present an R/Bioconductor port of a fast novel algorithm for Bayesian agglomerative hierarchical clustering and demonstrate its use in clustering gene expression microarray data. The method performs bottom-up hierarchical clustering, using a Dirichlet Process (infinite mixture) to model uncertainty in the data and Bayesian model selection to decide at each step which clusters to merge. CONCLUSION: Biologically plausible results are presented from a well studied data set: expression profiles of A. thaliana subjected to a variety of biotic and abiotic stresses. Our method avoids several limitations of traditional methods, for example how many clusters there should be and how to choose a principled distance metric. Richard S. Savage, Katherine A. Heller, Yang Xu 0023, Zoubin Ghahramani, William M. Truman, Murray Grant, Katherine J. Denby, David L. Wild |
BMC Bioinform. | 8 |
| 2009 | Modeling and Visualizing Uncertainty in Gene Expression Clusters Using Dirichlet Process MixturesabstractAlthough the use of clustering methods has rapidly become one of the standard computational approaches in the literature of microarray gene expression data, little attention has been paid to uncertainty in the results obtained. Dirichlet process mixture (DPM) models provide a nonparametric Bayesian alternative to the bootstrap approach to modeling uncertainty in gene expression clustering. Most previously published applications of Bayesian model-based clustering methods have been to short time series data. In this paper, we present a case study of the application of nonparametric Bayesian clustering methods to the clustering of high-dimensional nontime series gene expression data using full Gaussian covariances. We use the probability that two genes belong to the same cluster in a DPM model as a measure of the similarity of these gene expression profiles. Conversely, this probability can be used to define a dissimilarity measure, which, for the purposes of visualization, can be input to one of the standard linkage algorithms used for hierarchical clustering. Biologically plausible results are obtained from the Rosetta compendium of expression profiles which extend previously published cluster analyses of this data. Carl E. Rasmussen, Bernard J. de la Cruz, Zoubin Ghahramani, David L. Wild |
IEEE ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2006 | Bayesian Segmental Models with Multiple Sequence Alignment Profiles for Protein Secondary Structure and Contact Map PredictionabstractIn this paper, we develop a segmental semi-Markov model (SSMM) for protein secondary structure prediction which incorporates multiple sequence alignment profiles with the purpose of improving the predictive performance. The segmental model is a generalization of the hidden Markov model where a hidden state generates segments of various length and secondary structure type. A novel parameterized model is proposed for the likelihood function that explicitly represents multiple sequence alignment profiles to capture the segmental conformation. Numerical results on benchmark data sets show that incorporating the profiles results in substantial improvements and the generalization performance is promising. By incorporating the information from long range interactions in beta-sheets, this model is also capable of carrying out inference on contact maps. This is an important advantage of probabilistic generative models over the traditional discriminative approach to protein secondary structure prediction. The Web server of our algorithm and supplementary materials are available at http://public.kgi.edu/-wild/bsm.html. Zoubin Ghahramani, Alexei A. Podtelezhnikov, David L. Wild |
IEEE ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2005 | A Bayesian approach to reconstructing genetic regulatory networks with hidden factorsabstractMOTIVATION: We have used state-space models (SSMs) to reverse engineer transcriptional networks from highly replicated gene expression profiling time series data obtained from a well-established model of T cell activation. SSMs are a class of dynamic Bayesian networks in which the observed measurements depend on some hidden state variables that evolve according to Markovian dynamics. These hidden variables can capture effects that cannot be directly measured in a gene expression profiling experiment, for example: genes that have not been included in the microarray, levels of regulatory proteins, the effects of mRNA and protein degradation, etc. RESULTS: We have approached the problem of inferring the model structure of these state-space models using both classical and Bayesian methods. In our previous work, a bootstrap procedure was used to derive classical confidence intervals for parameters representing 'gene-gene' interactions over time. In this article, variational approximations are used to perform the analogous model selection task in the Bayesian context. Certain interactions are present in both the classical and the Bayesian analyses of these regulatory networks. The resulting models place JunB and JunD at the centre of the mechanisms that control apoptosis and proliferation. These mechanisms are key for clonal expansion and for controlling the long term behavior (e.g. programmed cell death) of these cells. AVAILABILITY: Supplementary data is available at http://public.kgi.edu/wild/index.htm and Matlab source code for variational Bayesian learning of SSMs is available at http://www.cse.ebuffalo.edu/faculty/mbeal/software.html. Matthew J. Beal, Francesco Falciani, Zoubin Ghahramani, Claudia Rangel, David L. Wild |
Bioinform. | 5 |
| 2005 | Biomarker discovery in microarray gene expression data with Gaussian processesabstractMOTIVATION: In clinical practice, pathological phenotypes are often labelled with ordinal scales rather than binary, e.g. the Gleason grading system for tumour cell differentiation. However, in the literature of microarray analysis, these ordinal labels have been rarely treated in a principled way. This paper describes a gene selection algorithm based on Gaussian processes to discover consistent gene expression patterns associated with ordinal clinical phenotypes. The technique of automatic relevance determination is applied to represent the significance level of the genes in a Bayesian inference framework. RESULTS: The usefulness of the proposed algorithm for ordinal labels is demonstrated by the gene expression signature associated with the Gleason score for prostate cancer data. Our results demonstrate how multi-gene markers that may be initially developed with a diagnostic or prognostic application in mind are also useful as an investigative tool to reveal associations between specific molecular and cellular events and features of tumour physiology. Our algorithm can also be applied to microarray data with binary labels with results comparable to other methods in the literature. Zoubin Ghahramani, Francesco Falciani, David L. Wild |
Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2004 | Protein secondary structure prediction using sigmoid belief networks to parameterize segmental semi-Markov models
Zoubin Ghahramani, David L. Wild |
ESANN | 3 |
| 2004 | A graphical model for protein secondary structure predictionabstractIn this paper, we present a graphical model for protein secondary structure prediction. This model extends segmental semi-Markov models (SSMM) to exploit multiple sequence alignment profiles which contain information from evolutionarily related sequences. A novel parameterized model is proposed as the likelihood function for the SSMM to capture the segmental conformation. By incorporating the information from long range interactions in ß-sheets, this model is capable of carrying out inference on contact maps. The numerical results on benchmark data sets show that incorporating the profiles results in substantial improvements and the generalization performance is promising. Zoubin Ghahramani, David L. Wild |
ICML | 3 |
| 2004 | Modeling T-cell activation using gene expression profiling and state-space modelsabstractMOTIVATION: We have used state-space models to reverse engineer transcriptional networks from highly replicated gene expression profiling time series data obtained from a well-established model of T-cell activation. State space models are a class of dynamic Bayesian networks that assume that the observed measurements depend on some hidden state variables that evolve according to Markovian dynamics. These hidden variables can capture effects that cannot be measured in a gene expression profiling experiment, e.g. genes that have not been included in the microarray, levels of regulatory proteins, the effects of messenger RNA and protein degradation, etc. RESULTS: Bootstrap confidence intervals are developed for parameters representing 'gene-gene' interactions over time. Our models represent the dynamics of T-cell activation and provide a methodology for the development of rational and experimentally testable hypotheses. AVAILABILITY: Supplementary data and Matlab computer source code will be made available on the web at the URL given below. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: http://public.kgi.edu/~wild/LDS/index.htm Claudia Rangel, John Angus, Zoubin Ghahramani, Maria Lioumi, Elizabeth Sotheran, Alessia Gaiba, David L. Wild, Francesco Falciani |
Bioinform. | 7 |
| 2002 | A Bayesian network model for protein fold and remote homologue recognitionabstractMOTIVATION: The Bayesian network approach is a framework which combines graphical representation and probability theory, which includes, as a special case, hidden Markov models. Hidden Markov models trained on amino acid sequence or secondary structure data alone have been shown to have potential for addressing the problem of protein fold and superfamily classification. RESULTS: This paper describes a novel implementation of a Bayesian network which simultaneously learns amino acid sequence, secondary structure and residue accessibility for proteins of known three-dimensional structure. An awareness of the errors inherent in predicted secondary structure may be incorporated into the model by means of a confusion matrix. Training and validation data have been derived for a number of protein superfamilies from the Structural Classification of Proteins (SCOP) database. Cross validation results using posterior probability classification demonstrate that the Bayesian network performs better in classifying proteins of known structural superfamily than a hidden Markov model trained on amino acid sequences alone. Alpan Raval, Zoubin Ghahramani, David L. Wild |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 1999 | Protein analyst - a distributed object environment for protein sequence and structure analysisabstractSUMMARY: Protein Analyst is a flexible tool for the analysis of protein sequences with emphasis on the integration of sequence and structural information. AVAILABILITY: The software will be available from the Oxford Molecular Biolib web site (http://www. oxmol.co.uk/biolib) and will be free to the academic research community. Mansoor A. S. Saqi, David L. Wild, M. J. Hartshorn |
Bioinform. | 2 |