Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Yaniv Kaplan

dblp:42/6634 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Distributed computing theory · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed computing theory
gathering
0.012004
Lower bounds for adaptive collect and related objects · PODC 2004
Distributed computing theory › concurrent objects
historyless object
0.012004
Lower bounds for adaptive collect and related objects · PODC 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

lower bound proof · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 Lower bounds for adaptive collect and related objects
abstract
An adaptive algorithm, whose step complexity adjusts to the number of active processes, is attractive for situations in which the number of participating processes is highly variable. This paper studies the number and type of multi-writer registers that are needed for adaptive algorithms. We prove that if a collect algorithm is f -adaptive to total contention, namely, its step complexity is f(k), where k is the number of processes that ever took a step, then it uses Ω(f-1(n) multi-writer registers, where n is the total number of processes in the system.Furthermore, we show that competition for the underlying registers is inherent for adaptive collect algorithms. We consider c-write registers, to which at most c processes can be concurrently about to write. Special attention is given to exclusive-write registers, the case c=1 where no competition is allowed, and concurrent-write registers, the case c=n where any amount of competition is allowed. A collect algorithm is f-adaptive to point contention, if its step complexity is f(k), where k is the maximum number of simultaneously active processes. Such an algorithm is shown to require Ω(f-1 (n c)) concurrent-write registers, even if an unlimited number of c-write registers are available. A smaller lower bound is also obtained in this situation for collect algorithms that are f-adaptive to total contention.The lower bounds also hold for nondeterministic implementations of sensitive objects from historyless objects.Finally, we present lower bounds on the step complexity in solo executions (i.e., without any contention), when only c-write registers are used: For weak test&set objects, we present an Ω(log n log c +log log n) lower bound. Our lower bound for collect and sensitive objects is Ω(n-1 c).
Hagit Attiya, Faith Ellen, Yaniv Kaplan
PODC3