Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Can Chen 0005
dblp:42/736-5
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
5as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-4244-055XORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 5 first-author · 8 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 57% Trustworthy machine learning · 10% Generative modeling · 7% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 22 heaviest of 23, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
model-based optimization |
2.6 | 4 | 2023 | Importance-aware Co-teaching for Offline Model-based Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 Parallel-mentoring for Offline Model-based Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 Bidirectional Learning for Offline Model-based Biological Sequence Design · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
offline model-based optimization |
1.9 | 3 | 2023 | Importance-aware Co-teaching for Offline Model-based Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 Parallel-mentoring for Offline Model-based Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 Bidirectional Learning for Offline Infinite-width Model-based Optimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ParetoFlow: Guided Flows in Multi-Objective Optimization · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
multi-objective optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ParetoFlow: Guided Flows in Multi-Objective Optimization · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › multi-objective optimization
pareto front approximation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ParetoFlow: Guided Flows in Multi-Objective Optimization · ICLR 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
drug discovery |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | 3DMolFormer: A Dual-channel Framework for Structure-based Drug Discovery · ICLR 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics › molecular modeling › molecular docking
protein-ligand docking |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | 3DMolFormer: A Dual-channel Framework for Structure-based Drug Discovery · ICLR 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery › drug design
structure-based drug design |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | 3DMolFormer: A Dual-channel Framework for Structure-based Drug Discovery · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Parallel-mentoring for Offline Model-based Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization
gradient ascent |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Importance-aware Co-teaching for Offline Model-based Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › synthetic biology
biological sequence design |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Bidirectional Learning for Offline Model-based Biological Sequence Design · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › overparameterized neural network
infinite-width neural networks |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Bidirectional Learning for Offline Infinite-width Model-based Optimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory › neural network kernels
neural tangent kernel |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Bidirectional Learning for Offline Infinite-width Model-based Optimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
class imbalance |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Generalized DataWeighting via Class-Level Gradient Manipulation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
data reweighting |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Generalized DataWeighting via Class-Level Gradient Manipulation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Generalized DataWeighting via Class-Level Gradient Manipulation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › learning with noisy labels
robustness to label noise |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Generalized DataWeighting via Class-Level Gradient Manipulation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
learning with noisy labels |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Importance-aware Co-teaching for Offline Model-based Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
pre-trained language model |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Bidirectional Learning for Offline Model-based Biological Sequence Design · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning
pseudo-labeling |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Importance-aware Co-teaching for Offline Model-based Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient-based optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Generalized DataWeighting via Class-Level Gradient Manipulation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › multi-objective optimization
gradient manipulation |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Generalized DataWeighting via Class-Level Gradient Manipulation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
bi-level optimization · 2.0bidirectional learning · 1.9neural tangent kernel · 1.3gradient-based optimization · 1.3gradient ascent · 1.2meta-learning · 1.2transformer · 0.9reinforcement learning fine-tuning · 0.9predictor guidance · 0.9pre-training · 0.9flow matching · 0.9evolutionary algorithm · 0.9adaptive soft-labeling · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | ParetoFlow: Guided Flows in Multi-Objective OptimizationabstractIn offline multi-objective optimization (MOO), we leverage an offline dataset of designs and their associated labels to simultaneously minimize multiple objectives. This setting more closely mirrors complex real-world problems compared to single-objective optimization. Recent works mainly employ evolutionary algorithms and Bayesian optimization, with limited attention given to the generative modeling capabilities inherent in such data. In this study, we explore generative modeling in offline MOO through flow matching, noted for its effectiveness and efficiency. We introduce \textit{ParetoFlow}, specifically designed to guide flow sampling to approximate the Pareto front. Traditional predictor~(classifier) guidance is inadequate for this purpose because it models only a single objective. In response, we propose a \textit{multi-objective predictor guidance} module that
assigns each sample a weight vector, representing a weighted distribution across multiple objective predictions. A local filtering scheme is introduced to address non-convex Pareto fronts. These weights uniformly cover the entire objective space, effectively directing sample generation towards the Pareto front. Since distributions with similar weights tend to generate similar samples, we introduce a \textit{neighboring evolution} module to foster knowledge sharing among neighboring distributions. This module generates offspring from these distributions, and selects the most promising one for the next iteration. Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance across various tasks. Our code is available. Ye Yuan 0017, Can Chen 0005, Christopher Joseph Pal, Xue (Steve) Liu |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2025 | 3DMolFormer: A Dual-channel Framework for Structure-based Drug DiscoveryabstractStructure-based drug discovery, encompassing the tasks of protein-ligand docking and pocket-aware 3D drug design, represents a core challenge in drug discovery. However, no existing work can deal with both tasks to effectively leverage the duality between them, and current methods for each task are hindered by challenges in modeling 3D information and the limitations of available data. To address these issues, we propose 3DMolFormer, a unified dual-channel transformer-based framework applicable to both docking and 3D drug design tasks, which exploits their duality by utilizing docking functionalities within the drug design process. Specifically, we represent 3D pocket-ligand complexes using parallel sequences of discrete tokens and continuous numbers, and we design a corresponding dual-channel transformer model to handle this format, thereby overcoming the challenges of 3D information modeling. Additionally, we alleviate data limitations through large-scale pre-training on a mixed dataset, followed by supervised and reinforcement learning fine-tuning techniques respectively tailored for the two tasks. Experimental results demonstrate that 3DMolFormer outperforms previous approaches in both protein-ligand docking and pocket-aware 3D drug design, highlighting its promising application in structure-based drug discovery. The code is available at: https://github.com/HXYfighter/3DMolFormer. Xiuyuan Hu, Can Chen 0005, Yang Zhao 0016, Hao Zhang 0005, Xue (Steve) Liu |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2024 | Dual-space Hierarchical Learning for Goal-guided Conversational Recommendation
Can Chen 0005, Hao Liu 0026, Zeming Liu, Xue (Steve) Liu, Dejing Dou |
Neurocomputing | 1 |
| 2023 | Bidirectional Learning for Offline Model-based Biological Sequence DesignabstractOffline model-based optimization aims to maximize a black-box objective function with a static dataset of designs and their scores. In this paper, we focus on biological sequence design to maximize some sequence score. A recent approach employs bidirectional learning, combining a forward mapping for exploitation and a backward mapping for constraint, and it relies on the neural tangent kernel (NTK) of an infinitely wide network to build a proxy model. Though effective, the NTK cannot learn features because of its parametrization, and its use prevents the incorporation of powerful pre-trained Language Models (LMs) that can capture the rich biophysical information in millions of biological sequences. We adopt an alternative proxy model, adding a linear head to a pre-trained LM, and propose a linearization scheme. This yields a closed-form loss and also takes into account the biophysical information in the pre-trained LM. In addition, the forward mapping and the backward mapping play different roles and thus deserve different weights during sequence optimization. To achieve this, we train an auxiliary model and leverage its weak supervision signal via a bi-level optimization framework to effectively learn how to balance the two mappings. Further, by extending the framework, we develop the first learning rate adaptation module Adaptive-$\eta$, which is compatible with all gradient-based algorithms for offline model-based optimization. Experimental results on DNA/protein sequence design tasks verify the effectiveness of our algorithm. Our code is available at https://github.com/GGchen1997/BIB-ICML2023-Submission. Can Chen 0005, Yingxue Zhang 0001, Xue (Steve) Liu, Mark Coates |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | Parallel-mentoring for Offline Model-based OptimizationabstractWe study offline model-based optimization to maximize a black-box objective function with a static dataset of designs and scores. These designs encompass a variety of domains, including materials, robots, DNA sequences, and proteins. A common approach trains a proxy on the static dataset and performs gradient ascent to obtain new designs. However, this often results in poor designs due to the proxy inaccuracies for out-of-distribution designs. Recent studies indicate that (a) gradient ascent with a mean ensemble of proxies generally outperforms simple gradient ascent, and (b) a trained proxy provides weak ranking supervision signals for design selection. Motivated by (a) and (b), we propose $\textit{parallel-mentoring}$ as an effective and novel method that facilitates mentoring among proxies, creating a more robust ensemble to mitigate the out-of-distribution issue. We focus on the three-proxy case in the main paper and our method consists of two modules. The first module, $\textit{voting-based pairwise supervision}$, operates on three parallel proxies and captures their ranking supervision signals as pairwise comparison labels. These labels are combined through majority voting to generate consensus labels, which incorporates ranking supervision signals from all proxies and enables mutual mentoring. Yet, label noise arises due to possible incorrect consensus. To alleviate this, we introduce an $\textit{adaptive soft-labeling}$ module with soft-labels initialized as consensus labels. Based on bi-level optimization, this module fine-tunes proxies in the inner level and learns more accurate labels in the outer level to adaptively mentor proxies, resulting in a more robust ensemble. Experiments validate the effectiveness of our method. Our code is available here. Can Chen 0005, Christopher Beckham, Zixuan Liu 0001, Xue (Steve) Liu, Christopher Joseph Pal |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Importance-aware Co-teaching for Offline Model-based OptimizationabstractOffline model-based optimization aims to find a design that maximizes a property of interest using only an offline dataset, with applications in robot, protein, and molecule design, among others. A prevalent approach is gradient ascent, where a proxy model is trained on the offline dataset and then used to optimize the design. This method suffers from an out-of-distribution issue, where the proxy is not accurate for unseen designs. To mitigate this issue, we explore using a pseudo-labeler to generate valuable data for fine-tuning the proxy.
Specifically, we propose $\textit{\textbf{I}mportance-aware \textbf{C}o-\textbf{T}eaching for Offline Model-based Optimization}~(\textbf{ICT})$. This method maintains three symmetric proxies with their mean ensemble as the final proxy, and comprises two steps. The first step is $\textit{pseudo-label-driven co-teaching}$. In this step, one proxy is iteratively selected as the pseudo-labeler for designs near the current optimization point, generating pseudo-labeled data. Subsequently, a co-teaching process identifies small-loss samples as valuable data and exchanges them between the other two proxies for fine-tuning, promoting knowledge transfer. This procedure is repeated three times, with a different proxy chosen as the pseudo-labeler each time, ultimately enhancing the ensemble performance.
To further improve accuracy of pseudo-labels, we perform a secondary step of $\textit{meta-learning-based sample reweighting}$,
which assigns importance weights to samples in the pseudo-labeled dataset and updates them via meta-learning. ICT achieves state-of-the-art results across multiple design-bench tasks, achieving the best mean rank $3.1$ and median rank $2$ among $15$ methods.
Our source code can be accessed here. Ye Yuan 0017, Can Chen 0005, Zixuan Liu 0001, Willie Neiswanger, Xue (Steve) Liu |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2022 | Bidirectional Learning for Offline Infinite-width Model-based OptimizationabstractIn offline model-based optimization, we strive to maximize a black-box objective function by only leveraging a static dataset of designs and their scores. This problem setting arises in numerous fields including the design of materials, robots, DNAs, proteins, etc. Recent approaches train a deep neural network (DNN) model on the static dataset to act as a proxy function, and then perform gradient ascent on the existing designs to obtain potentially high-scoring designs. This methodology frequently suffers from the out-of-distribution problem where the proxy function often returns adversarial designs. To mitigate this problem, we propose $\textit{\textbf{B}i\textbf{D}irectional learning for offline \textbf{I}nfinite-width model-based optimization}~(\textbf{BDI})$. BDI consists of two mappings: the forward mapping leverages the static dataset to predict the scores of the high-scoring designs, and the backward mapping leverages the high-scoring designs to predict the scores of the static dataset. The backward mapping, neglected in previous work, can distill more information of the static dataset into the high-scoring designs, which effectively mitigates the out-of-distribution problem. Yet, for a finite-width DNN model, the loss function of the backward mapping is intractable and only has an approximate form, which leads to a significant deterioration of the design quality. We thus adopt an infinite-width DNN model and propose to employ the corresponding neural tangent kernel to yield a closed-form loss for more accurate design updates. Experiments on various tasks verify the effectiveness of BDI. The code is available [here](https://github.com/GGchen1997/BDI). Can Chen 0005, Yingxue Zhang 0001, Jie Fu 0001, Xue (Steve) Liu, Mark Coates |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | Generalized DataWeighting via Class-Level Gradient ManipulationabstractLabel noise and class imbalance are two major issues coexisting in real-world datasets. To alleviate the two issues, state-of-the-art methods reweight each instance by leveraging a small amount of clean and unbiased data. Yet, these methods overlook class-level information within each instance, which can be further utilized to improve performance. To this end, in this paper, we propose Generalized Data Weighting (GDW) to simultaneously mitigate label noise and class imbalance by manipulating gradients at the class level. To be specific, GDW unrolls the loss gradient to class-level gradients by the chain rule and reweights the flow of each gradient separately. In this way, GDW achieves remarkable performance improvement on both issues. Aside from the performance gain, GDW efficiently obtains class-level weights without introducing any extra computational cost compared with instance weighting methods. Specifically, GDW performs a gradient descent step on class-level weights, which only relies on intermediate gradients. Extensive experiments in various settings verify the effectiveness of GDW. For example, GDW outperforms state-of-the-art methods by $2.56\%$ under the $60\%$ uniform noise setting in CIFAR10. Our code is available at https://github.com/GGchen1997/GDW-NIPS2021. Can Chen 0005, Shuhao Zheng, Xi Chen 0009, Erqun Dong, Xue (Steve) Liu, Hao Liu 0026, Dejing Dou |
NeurIPS | 1 |