EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Opal Perry
dblp:42/8300
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 61% Services computing and microservices · 30% Empirical software engineering · 9% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Services computing and microservices
service engineering |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | From Software Architecture Analysis to Service Engineering: An Empirical Study of Methodology Development for Enterprise SOA Implementation · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2010 |
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | From Software Architecture Analysis to Service Engineering: An Empirical Study of Methodology Development for Enterprise SOA Implementation · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2010 |
Requirements engineering and software design › software architecture
software architecture analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | From Software Architecture Analysis to Service Engineering: An Empirical Study of Methodology Development for Enterprise SOA Implementation · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
design process model · 0.1action research · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | From Software Architecture Analysis to Service Engineering: An Empirical Study of Methodology Development for Enterprise SOA ImplementationabstractThis paper presents an integrated service-oriented enterprise system development framework (called the BITAM-SOA Framework) as well as an instantiated design process model (called the Service Engineering Schematic) that was a result from a three-year action research case study with a Fortune 50 company in the financial services industry. The BITAM-SOA Framework and Schematic advance are both business-IT alignment and software architecture analysis techniques supporting the engineering of enterprise-wide service-oriented systems-that is, service engineering. Hong-Mei Chen, Rick Kazman, Opal Perry |
IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. | 3 |
| 2009 | An integrated framework for service engineering: a case study in the financial services industryabstractService engineering, the application of engineering disciplines to develop service-oriented enterprise systems (service systems) with predicable results, has faced a brand new array of challenges in recent years. Existing development approaches that might help addressing these challenges are scattered in separate research fields or in different units of an organization, just like the "blind men and the elephant." This article presents a 3-year action research case study with a Fortune 50 company in the financial services industry, validating an integrated service-oriented business-IT alignment framework, called the BITAM-SOA Framework, to shed light on complex service engineering issues, including the interplay between business-IT alignment approaches (alignment via architecture, via governance and via communication) and Service Oriented Architecture adoption as well as methodological challenges of service engineering. The importance of the social dimension of service engineering is illuminated. The results yield lessons learned, managerial insights and integrated methods for effective service engineering. Hong-Mei Chen, Opal Perry, Rick Kazman |
ICEC | 2 |