Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

John R. Jungck

dblp:42/8889 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
0000-0003-4621-5333ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational science and engineering
spatial statistics
0.112012
Ka-me: a Voronoi image analyzer · Bioinform. 2012
Computational science and engineering › computational geometry
voronoi tessellation
0.112012
Ka-me: a Voronoi image analyzer · Bioinform. 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

voronoi polygons · 0.1graph theory · 0.1delaunay triangulation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Mathematics and evolutionary biology make bioinformatics education comprehensible
abstract
The patterns of variation within a molecular sequence data set result from the interplay between population genetic, molecular evolutionary and macroevolutionary processes-the standard purview of evolutionary biologists. Elucidating these patterns, particularly for large data sets, requires an understanding of the structure, assumptions and limitations of the algorithms used by bioinformatics software-the domain of mathematicians and computer scientists. As a result, bioinformatics often suffers a 'two-culture' problem because of the lack of broad overlapping expertise between these two groups. Collaboration among specialists in different fields has greatly mitigated this problem among active bioinformaticians. However, science education researchers report that much of bioinformatics education does little to bridge the cultural divide, the curriculum too focused on solving narrow problems (e.g. interpreting pre-built phylogenetic trees) rather than on exploring broader ones (e.g. exploring alternative phylogenetic strategies for different kinds of data sets). Herein, we present an introduction to the mathematics of tree enumeration, tree construction, split decomposition and sequence alignment. We also introduce off-line downloadable software tools developed by the BioQUEST Curriculum Consortium to help students learn how to interpret and critically evaluate the results of standard bioinformatics analyses.
John R. Jungck, Anton E. Weisstein
Briefings Bioinform.1
2013 Editorial: International, interdisciplinary, multi-level bioinformatics training and education
abstract
Bioinformatics is central to biology in the 21st century. The generation of terabytes to petabytes of data per day has increased the complexity and challenges of contemporary biological research. The use of computer-based analytical tools on electronically stored and distributed data is fundamentally changing not only core life science research but also its application to problems in medicine, agriculture, conservation and forensics. In light of this ‘information revolution’, school, college and university curricula as well as various forms of postgraduate training and informal education must be redesigned to prepare the next generation of life scientists. In this special issue of Briefings in Bioinformatics, we continue to report on various initiatives in bioinformatics education and training begun in a previous special issue published here in 2010 [11 (6)]. To address the needs of diverse learners and citizenries from multiple cultures, there is a tremendous need for heterogeneous approaches. The articles included herein are drawn from (i) multiple countries: Australia, Costa Rica, Israel, the Netherlands, New Zealand, UK, United States; (ii) multiple curricular levels: public citizenry, secondary level, college and university level, graduate students, postgraduate level (PhD and postdoctoral fellows), faculty development, scientific research community; (iii) multiple pedagogies that range from informal education to training and transmission to engagement in open-ended, collaborative and problem-based learning environments; and (iv) software use that range from Wikis and spreadsheets to high-end research suites. All authors desire to enhance, expand and empower an international community of bioinformatics educators, trainers and researchers. Most operate in the copyleft paradigm of sharing software, databases and analytical tools in an open access environment. The authors report that the current revolution in biological research is a wonderful opportunity to reform the way we teach life sciences. Three factors in particular make this a unique time to explore new ways to enhance learning: The research data and analytical tools are now easily accessible in the public domain; Faculty recognize that they need to seek professional development to stay abreast of the changes in biological knowledge and techniques; and Students are aware of the changes in biology and related disciplines, understand that solving biological problems is relevant to their lives and realize that bioinformatics skills hold possibilities for future employment. Taken together, the convergence of these factors affords us the opportunity to move curriculum reform beyond the relatively small group of ‘early adopters’ to engage the much larger ‘early majority’ of biology faculty. Bioinformatics is a subject in transition subject to being defined differently by life scientists, computer scientists, engineers, experimentalists, mathematicians and so forth. However, despite these differences, when it comes to education and training, there is widespread agreement that to use the databases, software, primary literature, theoretical lenses and applications, users need to develop more quantitative reasoning skills to conceptually understand the bioinformatics challenges faced today. Techniques may change such as recently occurred in the shift away from microarrays to analyze gene expression to RNA-seq analyses of transcriptomes or from a reliance on strictly bifurcating phylogenetic trees based on sequences to network models based on complete genomes that accommodate horizontal gene transfer and endosymbiosis. So the challenge is how do we educate for such a rapidly changing, ill-formed discipline? The authors inside describe exciting possibilities that are adoptable, adaptable and implementable in a wide variety of contexts.
Maria Victoria Schneider, John R. Jungck
Briefings Bioinform.2
2012 Ka-me: a Voronoi image analyzer
abstract
SUMMARY: Ka-me is a Voronoi image analyzer that allows users to analyze any image with a convex polygonal tessellation or any spatial point distribution by fitting Voronoi polygons and their dual, Delaunay triangulations, to the pattern. The analytical tools include a variety of graph theoretic and geometric tools that summarize the distribution of the numbers of edges per face, areas, perimeters, angles of Delaunay triangle edges (anglograms), Gabriel graphs, nearest neighbor graphs, minimal spanning trees, Ulam trees, Pitteway tests, circumcircles and convexhulls, as well as spatial statistics (Clark-Evans Nearest Neighborhood and Variance to Mean Ratio) and export functions for standard relationships (Lewis's Law, Desch's Law and Aboav-Weaire Law). AVAILABILITY: Ka-me: a Voronoi image analyzer is available as an executable with documentation and sample applications from the BioQUEST Library (http://bioquest.org/downloads/kame_1.0.rar).
Noppadon Khiripet, Wongarnet Khantuwan, John R. Jungck
Bioinform.3
2010 Bioinformatics education dissemination with an evolutionary problem solving perspective
abstract
Bioinformatics is central to biology education in the 21st century. With the generation of terabytes of data per day, the application of computer-based tools to stored and distributed data is fundamentally changing research and its application to problems in medicine, agriculture, conservation and forensics. In light of this 'information revolution,' undergraduate biology curricula must be redesigned to prepare the next generation of informed citizens as well as those who will pursue careers in the life sciences. The BEDROCK initiative (Bioinformatics Education Dissemination: Reaching Out, Connecting and Knitting together) has fostered an international community of bioinformatics educators. The initiative's goals are to: (i) Identify and support faculty who can take leadership roles in bioinformatics education; (ii) Highlight and distribute innovative approaches to incorporating evolutionary bioinformatics data and techniques throughout undergraduate education; (iii) Establish mechanisms for the broad dissemination of bioinformatics resource materials and teaching models; (iv) Emphasize phylogenetic thinking and problem solving; and (v) Develop and publish new software tools to help students develop and test evolutionary hypotheses. Since 2002, BEDROCK has offered more than 50 faculty workshops around the world, published many resources and supported an environment for developing and sharing bioinformatics education approaches. The BEDROCK initiative builds on the established pedagogical philosophy and academic community of the BioQUEST Curriculum Consortium to assemble the diverse intellectual and human resources required to sustain an international reform effort in undergraduate bioinformatics education.
John R. Jungck, Samuel S. Donovan, Anton E. Weisstein, Noppadon Khiripet, Stephen J. Everse
Briefings Bioinform.1