Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yasuhisa Yoshida
dblp:42/9922
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Language models and text generation · 48% Information extraction and text analysis · 45% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 5% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization |
0.6 | 3 | 2015 | Summarizing a Document by Trimming the Discourse Tree · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2015 Dependency-based Discourse Parser for Single-Document Summarization · EMNLP 2014 Single-Document Summarization as a Tree Knapsack Problem · EMNLP 2013 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis
discourse parsing |
0.4 | 2 | 2015 | Summarization Based on Task-Oriented Discourse Parsing · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2015 Dependency-based Discourse Parser for Single-Document Summarization · EMNLP 2014 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
extractive summarization |
0.4 | 2 | 2015 | Summarizing a Document by Trimming the Discourse Tree · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2015 Single-Document Summarization as a Tree Knapsack Problem · EMNLP 2013 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
discourse analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Summarizing a Document by Trimming the Discourse Tree · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2015 |
Information retrieval
text summarization |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Summarization Based on Task-Oriented Discourse Parsing · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2015 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis › discourse parsing
discourse dependency parsing |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Dependency-based Discourse Parser for Single-Document Summarization · EMNLP 2014 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization › document summarization
single-document summarization |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Dependency-based Discourse Parser for Single-Document Summarization · EMNLP 2014 |
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Single-Document Summarization as a Tree Knapsack Problem · EMNLP 2013 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sentiment analysis › sentiment classification
cross-domain sentiment classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Transfer Learning for Multiple-Domain Sentiment Analysis - Identifying Domain Dependent/Independent Word Polarity · AAAI 2011 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation › domain adaptation for NLP
domain adaptation for sentiment analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Transfer Learning for Multiple-Domain Sentiment Analysis - Identifying Domain Dependent/Independent Word Polarity · AAAI 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Transfer Learning for Multiple-Domain Sentiment Analysis - Identifying Domain Dependent/Independent Word Polarity · AAAI 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
rhetorical structure theory · 0.5tree-based summary extraction · 0.4discourse parser training · 0.4tree knapsack problem · 0.4integer linear programming · 0.3dynamic programming · 0.2transfer learning · 0.1gibbs sampling · 0.1bayesian probabilistic model · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Summarizing a Document by Trimming the Discourse TreeabstractRecent studies on extractive text summarization formulate it as a combinatorial optimization problem, extracting the optimal subset from a set of the textual units that maximizes an objective function without violating the length constraint. Although these methods successfully improve automatic evaluation scores, they do not consider the discourse structure in the source document. Thus, summaries generated by these methods may lack logical coherence. In previous work, we proposed a method that exploits a discourse tree structure to produce coherent summaries. By transforming a traditional discourse tree, namely a rhetorical structure theory-based discourse tree (RST-DT), into a dependency-based discourse tree (DEP-DT), we formulated the summarization procedure as a Tree Knapsack Problem whose tree corresponds to the DEP-DT. This paper extends the work with a detailed discussion of the approach together with a novel efficient dynamic programming algorithm for solving the Tree Knapsack Problem. Experiments show that our method not only achieved the highest score in both automatic and human evaluation, but also obtained good performance in terms of the linguistic qualities of the summaries. Tsutomu Hirao, Masaaki Nishino, Yasuhisa Yoshida, Jun Suzuki 0001, Norihito Yasuda, Masaaki Nagata |
IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. | 3 |
| 2015 | Summarization Based on Task-Oriented Discourse ParsingabstractPrevious research demonstrates that discourse relations can help generate high-quality summaries. Existing studies usually adopt existing discourse parsers directly with no modifications, hence cannot take full advantage of discourse parsing. This paper describes a new single document summarization system. In contrast to previous work, we train a discourse parser specially for summarization by using summaries. The training data are dynamically changed during the training phase to enable the parser to grab the text units that are important for summaries. A special tree-based summary extraction algorithm is designed to work with the new parser. The proposed system enables us to combine discourse parsing and summarization in a unified scheme. Experiments on both the RST-DT and DUC2001 datasets show the effectiveness of the proposed method. Yasuhisa Yoshida, Tsutomu Hirao, Katsuhito Sudoh, Masaaki Nagata |
IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. | 2 |
| 2014 | Dependency-based Discourse Parser for Single-Document SummarizationabstractThe current state-of-the-art single-document summarization method gen-erates a summary by solving a Tree Knapsack Problem (TKP), which is the problem of finding the optimal rooted sub-tree of the dependency-based discourse tree (DEP-DT) of a document. We can obtain a gold DEP-DT by transforming a gold Rhetorical Structure Theory-based discourse tree (RST-DT). However, there is still a large difference between the ROUGE scores of a system with a gold DEP-DT and a system with a DEP-DT obtained from an automatically parsed RST-DT. To improve the ROUGE score, we propose a novel discourse parser that directly generates the DEP-DT. The evaluation results showed that the TKP with our parser outperformed that with the state-of-the-art RST-DT parser, and achieved almost equivalent ROUGE scores to the TKP with the gold DEP-DT. 1 Yasuhisa Yoshida, Jun Suzuki 0001, Tsutomu Hirao, Masaaki Nagata |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2013 | Single-Document Summarization as a Tree Knapsack ProblemabstractRecent studies on extractive text summarization formulate it as a combinatorial optimization problem such as a Knapsack Problem, a Maximum Coverage Problem or a Budgeted Median Problem.These methods successfully improved summarization quality, but they did not consider the rhetorical relations between the textual units of a source document.Thus, summaries generated by these methods may lack logical coherence.This paper proposes a single document summarization method based on the trimming of a discourse tree.This is a two-fold process.First, we propose rules for transforming a rhetorical structure theorybased discourse tree into a dependency-based discourse tree, which allows us to take a treetrimming approach to summarization.Second, we formulate the problem of trimming a dependency-based discourse tree as a Tree Knapsack Problem, then solve it with integer linear programming (ILP).Evaluation results showed that our method improved ROUGE scores. Tsutomu Hirao, Yasuhisa Yoshida, Masaaki Nishino, Norihito Yasuda, Masaaki Nagata |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2011 | Transfer Learning for Multiple-Domain Sentiment Analysis - Identifying Domain Dependent/Independent Word PolarityabstractSentiment analysis is the task of determining the attitude (positive or negative) of documents. While the polarity of words in the documents is informative for this task, polarity of some words cannot be determined without domain knowledge. Detecting word polarity thus poses a challenge for multiple-domain sentiment analysis. Previous approaches tackle this problem with transfer learning techniques, but they cannot handle multiple source domains and multiple target domains. This paper proposes a novel Bayesian probabilistic model to handle multiple source and multiple target domains. In this model, each word is associated with three factors: Domain label, domain dependence/independence and word polarity. We derive an efficient algorithm using Gibbs sampling for inferring the parameters of the model, from both labeled and unlabeled texts. Using real data, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our model in a document polarity classification task compared with a method not considering the differences between domains. Moreover our method can also tell whether each word's polarity is domain-dependent or domain-independent. This feature allows us to construct a word polarity dictionary for each domain. Yasuhisa Yoshida, Tsutomu Hirao, Tomoharu Iwata, Masaaki Nagata, Yuji Matsumoto 0001 |
AAAI | 1 |