Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hallie Xu

dblp:420/0564 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0001-0158-5069ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-AI interaction · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-AI interaction
large language model interaction
1.012026
Just-In-Time Objectives: A General Approach for Specialized AI Interactions · CHI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

passive behavior observation · 2.0objective induction · 2.0generation and evaluation · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Just-In-Time Objectives: A General Approach for Specialized AI Interactions
abstract
Large language models promise a broad set of functions, but when not given a specific objective, they default to generic results. We demonstrate that inferring the user’s in-the-moment objective, then rapidly optimizing for that singular objective, enables LLMs to produce specialized tools, interfaces, and responses. Our work introduces just-in-time objectives, which model a user’s goals to specialize LLM systems on the fly. We contribute an architecture for automatically inducing such objectives by passively observing user behavior, then steering downstream AI systems through generation and evaluation against this objective. Inducing just-in-time objectives (e.g., “Clarify the abstract’s research contribution”) enables automatic generation of tools, e.g., those that critique a draft based on relevant HCI methodologies, anticipate related researchers’ reactions, or surface ambiguous terminology. In a series of experiments on participants’ own tasks, JIT objectives enable LLM outputs that achieve 66–86% win rates over typical LLMs. In-person use sessions confirm that JIT objectives produce specialized tools that are unique to each participant and are rated as significantly higher quality than a standard LLM chat tool.
Michelle S. Lam, Omar Shaikh, Hallie Xu, Alice Guo, Diyi Yang, Jeffrey Heer, James A. Landay, Michael S. Bernstein
CHI3