Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tim Göttlicher

dblp:420/0596 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Distributed computing theory · 33% Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 33% Quantum computing and quantum information · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed computing theory
distributed graph algorithms
1.012026
A Post-Quantum Lower Bound for the Distributed Lovasz Local Lemma · SODA 2026
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics › probabilistic method
lovász local lemma
1.012026
A Post-Quantum Lower Bound for the Distributed Lovasz Local Lemma · SODA 2026
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum network
quantum distributed computing
1.012026
A Post-Quantum Lower Bound for the Distributed Lovasz Local Lemma · SODA 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sinkless orientation · 1.0lower bound · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 A Post-Quantum Lower Bound for the Distributed Lovasz Local Lemma
abstract
In this work, we study the Lovász local lemma (LLL) problem in the area of distributed quantum computing, which has been the focus of attention of recent advances in quantum computing [STOC’24, STOC’25, STOC’25]. We prove a lower bound of \(2^{\Omega(\log^*n)}\) for the complexity of the distributed LLL in the quantum-LOCAL model. More specifically, we obtain our lower bound already for a very well-studied special case of the LLL, called sinkless orientation, in a stronger model than quantum-LOCAL, called the randomized online-LOCAL model. As a consequence, we obtain the same lower bounds for sinkless orientation and the distributed LLL also in a variety of other models studied across different research communities.
Sebastian Brandt 0002, Tim Göttlicher
SODA2