Trevor Adriaanse

dblp:420/0853 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0004-6430-2320ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 4 since 2021
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 RoutIR: Fast Serving of Retrieval Pipelines for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Eugene Yang 0001, Andrew Yates, Dawn J. Lawrie, James Mayfield, Trevor Adriaanse
ECIR (4)5
2026 Search for Coverage: Learning Coverage-Aware Retrieval with Augmented Sub-Question Answerability
abstract
Long-form Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) brings the challenge of coverage-based ranking, because ranking methods must ensure the inclusion of comprehensive relevant nuggets (i.e., facts), which can thereby be synthesized into a comprehensive output. In this work, we propose CoveR, a dense retrieval method optimized for coverage-aware retrieval scenarios. CoveR is a bi-encoder trained with the coverage-based contrastive and distillation objectives, which enables CoveR to capture diverse aspects of information needs. To train CoveR, we create the SCOPE dataset, which comprises 90K training pairs from Researchy Questions with synthetic coverage signals augmented from sub-question answerability judgments generated by LLMs. Our empirical experiments show that CoveR enhances nugget coverage by 10% over strong dense retrieval baselines without sacrificing its relevance-based retrieval capability. Further ablation studies validate the importance of our proposed learning method, showing that CoveR achieves a superior trade-off between relevance- and coverage-based ranking, which is essential for long-form RAG.
Jia-Huei Ju, Eugene Yang 0001, Trevor Adriaanse, Suzan Verberne, Andrew Yates
SIGIR3
2026 CoverageBench: Evaluating Information Coverage across Tasks and Domains
abstract
We wish to measure the information coverage of an ad hoc retrieval algorithm, that is, how much of the range of available relevant information is covered by the search results. Information coverage is a central aspect for retrieval, especially when the retrieval system is integrated with generative models in a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) system. The classic metrics for ad hoc retrieval, precision and recall, reward a system as more relevant documents are retrieved. However, since relevance in ad hoc test collections is defined for a document without any relation to other documents that might contain the same information, high recall is sufficient but not necessary to ensure coverage. The same is true for other metrics such as rank-biased precision (RBP), normalized discounted cumulative gain (nDCG), and mean average precision (MAP). Test collections developed around the notion of diversity ranking in web search incorporate multiple aspects that support a concept of coverage in the web domain. In this work, we construct a benchmark, CoverageBench, for evaluating information coverage made from existing collections. This suite offers researchers a unified testbed spanning multiple genres and tasks. All topics, nuggets, relevance labels, and baseline rankings are released on Hugging Face Datasets, along with instructions for accessing the publicly available document collections.
Saron Samuel, Andrew Yates, Dawn J. Lawrie, Ian Soboroff, Trevor Adriaanse, Benjamin Van Durme, Eugene Yang 0001
SIGIR5
2026 Clustering-Based Methods for Vector-Based Pseudo-Relevance Feedback
abstract
Prior work has shown that vector-based pseudo relevance feedback (PRF) is an effective technique for query expansion for improving retrieval results in dense information retrieval. In dense retrieval, ColBERT-PRF has emerged as a novel mechanism, using cluster centroids built from feedback documents as PRF expansion tokens and leveraging statistical information from the closest neighboring token ids to dictate how useful these expansion tokens are. While this approach has been shown to work well in the monolingual retrieval setting for English using the original ColBERT infrastructure, such systems have since evolved to improve inference speed, reduce storage and memory usage, and support cross-language (CLIR) and multilingual (MLIR) retrieval. As a result, many of these advancements have reduced the ability to utilize token-level statistics. In this work, we aim to explore how well this type of approach can adapt to dense retrieval models when it is not feasible to use surface-form information to pick discriminating expansion tokens. Furthermore, we explore alternative clustering mechanisms, such as HDBScan, to compare how different clustering methods perform at building clusters that can be useful for PRF. Experiments on MLIR, CLIR, and Report Generation tasks, such as those in the TREC 2024 NeuCLIR Report Generation Pilot Task, show that even without access to these token statistics, the use of cluster centroids for PRF can still improve nDCG and α-nDCG by up to 12%.
Xavier Velez, Andrew Yates, Eugene Yang 0001, Trevor Adriaanse, Sanjeev Khudanpur
SIGIR4