Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Wenbu Feng

dblp:420/2081 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0003-9639-9123ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Compilers and program optimization · 77% Program synthesis and code generation · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Compilers and program optimization
decompilation
1.012026
FidelityGPT: Correcting Decompilation Distortions with Retrieval Augmented Generation · NDSS 2026
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models
0.312026
FidelityGPT: Correcting Decompilation Distortions with Retrieval Augmented Generation · NDSS 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

retrieval-augmented generation · 1.0large language model · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 FidelityGPT: Correcting Decompilation Distortions with Retrieval Augmented Generation
Zhiping Zhou, Xiaohong Li 0001, Yao Zhang 0019, Yuekang Li, Wenbu Feng, Yunqian Wang
NDSS6
2026 Determining the Unreachable: Constraint-Guided Reachability Analysis for Dependency Vulnerabilities
abstract
In software development, investigating the accessibility of dependency vulnerabilities is of great importance, as third-party libraries often contain known vulnerabilities that could be exploited in the application's business logic. The existing accessibility analysis methods encounter challenges such as undecidability, abstraction loss, and path explosion in large-scale programs, resulting in an inaccurate distinction between accessibility vulnerabilities and non-accessibility vulnerabilities. This paper introduces an approach called ConVReach for analyzing the reachability of vulnerabilities in dependencies in C/C++ programs. ConVReach overcomes the problems of high abstraction loss and potential path explosion in the current methods by combining static and dynamic approaches, particularly a constraint-guided analysis method. This approach extracts and decomposes the path constraints that trigger vulnerabilities, independently verifies the satisfiability of each constraint, and then aggregates the feasible paths. This effectively reduces unnecessary path exploration and avoids the common path explosion issues in traditional methods. Experimental results show that ConVReach outperforms existing tools in both accuracy and efficiency, effectively distinguishing between reachable and unreachable vulnerabilities, and significantly reducing false positives and false negatives. We constructed a benchmark dataset to evaluate ConVReach , which includes 53 CVEs and 347 flags artificially inserted into various open-source projects. This dataset was designed to simulate both real-world vulnerabilities and complex scenarios. Through testing on this dataset, ConVReach demonstrated exceptional performance. It successfully identified 59 out of 61 reachable vulnerabilities and all 23 unreachable ones in the CVE dataset. Within a 24-hour time budget, ConVReach detected above 50% more reachable vulnerabilities than the baseline tools in the first 6 hours and nearly completed the detection of reachable vulnerabilities by the 12-hour mark. These results highlight ConVReach 's superior ability to handle both real-world vulnerabilities and challenging cases.
Wenbu Feng, Xiaohong Li 0001, Yao Zhang 0019, Yuekang Li, Zhiping Zhou, Yunqian Wang
Proc. ACM Program. Lang.1