Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Elaine Siyu Liu

dblp:420/2241 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 77% Computational complexity · 23%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining
clustering
0.912025
Optimal Graph Clustering without Edge Density Signals · NeurIPS 2025
Data mining › clustering
graph clustering
0.912025
Optimal Graph Clustering without Edge Density Signals · NeurIPS 2025
Data mining › clustering
spectral clustering
0.912025
Optimal Graph Clustering without Edge Density Signals · NeurIPS 2025
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph clustering › community detection
stochastic block model
0.912025
Optimal Graph Clustering without Edge Density Signals · NeurIPS 2025
Computational complexity
phase transition
0.312025
Optimal Graph Clustering without Edge Density Signals · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

spectral embedding · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Optimal Graph Clustering without Edge Density Signals
abstract
This paper establishes the theoretical limits of graph clustering under the Popularity-Adjusted Block Model (PABM), addressing limitations of existing models. In contrast to the Stochastic Block Model (SBM), which assumes uniform vertex degrees, and to the Degree-Corrected Block Model (DCBM), which applies uniform degree corrections across clusters, PABM introduces separate popularity parameters for intra- and inter-cluster connections. Our main contribution is the characterization of the optimal error rate for clustering under PABM, which provides novel insights on clustering hardness: we demonstrate that unlike SBM and DCBM, cluster recovery remains possible in PABM even when traditional edge-density signals vanish, provided intra- and inter-cluster popularity coefficients differ. This highlights a dimension of degree heterogeneity captured by PABM but overlooked by DCBM: local differences in connectivity patterns can enhance cluster separability independently of global edge densities. Finally, because PABM exhibits a richer structure, its expected adjacency matrix has rank between $k$ and $k^2$, where $k$ is the number of clusters. As a result, spectral embeddings based on the top $k$ eigenvectors may fail to capture important structural information. Our numerical experiments on both synthetic and real datasets confirm that spectral clustering algorithms incorporating $k^2$ eigenvectors outperform traditional spectral approaches.
Maximilien Dreveton, Elaine Siyu Liu, Matthias Grossglauser, Patrick Thiran
NeurIPS2