Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Petros Prastakos

dblp:420/3611 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
0.912025
Differentially Private High-dimensional Variable Selection via Integer Programming · NeurIPS 2025
Mathematical optimization › sparse optimization
best subset selection
0.912025
Differentially Private High-dimensional Variable Selection via Integer Programming · NeurIPS 2025
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization
0.912025
Differentially Private High-dimensional Variable Selection via Integer Programming · NeurIPS 2025
Mathematical optimization › discrete optimization
mixed integer linear programming
0.912025
Differentially Private High-dimensional Variable Selection via Integer Programming · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

structured sampling · 1.7exponential mechanism · 1.7MIP · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Differentially Private High-dimensional Variable Selection via Integer Programming
abstract
Sparse variable selection improves interpretability and generalization in high-dimensional learning by selecting a small subset of informative features. Recent advances in Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) have enabled solving large-scale non-private sparse regression—known as Best Subset Selection (BSS)—with millions of variables in minutes. However, extending these algorithmic advances to the setting of Differential Privacy (DP) has remained largely unexplored. In this paper, we introduce two new differentially private estimators for sparse variable selection, levering modern MIP techniques. Our framework is general and applies broadly to problems like sparse regression or classification, and we provide theoretical support recovery guarantees in the case of BSS. Inspired by the exponential mechanism, we develop structured sampling procedures that efficiently explore the non-convex objective landscape, avoiding the exhaustive combinatorial search in the exponential mechanism. We complement our theoretical findings with extensive numerical experiments, using both least squares and hinge loss for our objective function, and demonstrate that our methods achieve state-of-the-art empirical support recovery, outperforming competing algorithms in settings with up to $p=10^4$.
Petros Prastakos, Kayhan Behdin, Rahul Mazumder
NeurIPS1