Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Petros Prastakos
dblp:420/3611
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Differentially Private High-dimensional Variable Selection via Integer Programming · NeurIPS 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › sparse optimization
best subset selection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Differentially Private High-dimensional Variable Selection via Integer Programming · NeurIPS 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Differentially Private High-dimensional Variable Selection via Integer Programming · NeurIPS 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › discrete optimization
mixed integer linear programming |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Differentially Private High-dimensional Variable Selection via Integer Programming · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
structured sampling · 1.7exponential mechanism · 1.7MIP · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Differentially Private High-dimensional Variable Selection via Integer ProgrammingabstractSparse variable selection improves interpretability and generalization in high-dimensional learning by selecting a small subset of informative features. Recent advances in Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) have enabled solving large-scale non-private sparse regression—known as Best Subset Selection (BSS)—with millions of variables in minutes. However, extending these algorithmic advances to the setting of Differential Privacy (DP) has remained largely unexplored. In this paper, we introduce two new differentially private estimators for sparse variable selection, levering modern MIP techniques. Our framework is general and applies broadly to problems like sparse regression or classification, and we provide theoretical support recovery guarantees in the case of BSS. Inspired by the exponential mechanism, we develop structured sampling procedures that efficiently explore the non-convex objective landscape, avoiding the exhaustive combinatorial search in the exponential mechanism. We complement our theoretical findings with extensive numerical experiments, using both least squares and hinge loss for our objective function, and demonstrate that our methods achieve state-of-the-art empirical support recovery, outperforming competing algorithms in settings with up to $p=10^4$. Petros Prastakos, Kayhan Behdin, Rahul Mazumder |
NeurIPS | 1 |