Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jack Spilecki

dblp:420/4619 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-0085-8616ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Quantum computing and quantum information · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum metrology
quantum fisher information
1.012026
The Debiased Keyl's Algorithm: A New Unbiased Estimator for Full State Tomography · STOC 2026
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum metrology
1.012026
The Debiased Keyl's Algorithm: A New Unbiased Estimator for Full State Tomography · STOC 2026
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum state tomography
1.012026
The Debiased Keyl's Algorithm: A New Unbiased Estimator for Full State Tomography · STOC 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

unbiased estimator · 1.0shadow tomography · 1.0keyl's algorithm · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 The Debiased Keyl's Algorithm: A New Unbiased Estimator for Full State Tomography
abstract
In the problem of quantum state tomography, one is given n copies of an unknown rank-r mixed state ρ ∈ ℂd × d and asked to produce an estimator of ρ. In this work, we present the debiased Keyl’s algorithm, the first estimator for full state tomography which is both unbiased and sample-optimal. We derive an explicit formula for the second moment of our estimator, with which we show the following five applications. First, we give a new proof that n = O(rd/ε2) copies are sufficient to learn a rank-r mixed state to trace distance error ε, which is optimal. Second, we show that n = O(rd/ε2) copies are sufficient to learn to error ε in the more challenging Bures distance, which is also optimal. Third, we consider full state tomography when one is only allowed to measure k copies at once. We show that n =O(max(d3/√kε2, d2/ε2 ) ) copies suffice to learn in trace distance. This improves on the prior work of Chen et al. and matches their lower bound. Fourth, for shadow tomography, we show that O(log(m)/ε2) copies are sufficient to learn m given observables O1, …, Om in the ”high accuracy regime”, when ε = O(1/d), improving on a result of Chen et al. More generally, we show that if tr(Oi2) ≤ F for all i, then n = O(log(m) · (min{√r F/ε, F2/3/ε4/3}+ 1/ε2)) copies suffice, improving on existing work. Finally, for quantum metrology, we give a locally unbiased algorithm whose mean squared error matrix is upper bounded by twice the inverse of the quantum Fisher information matrix in the asymptotic limit of large n, which is optimal.
Angelos Pelecanos, Jack Spilecki, John Wright 0004
STOC2