Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jonas C. Wolber

dblp:420/5089 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0005-3385-5528ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
gene expression prediction
0.912025
Prediction of gene expression using histone modification patterns extracted by Particle Swarm Optimization · Bioinform. 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
transcriptional regulation analysis
0.312025
Prediction of gene expression using histone modification patterns extracted by Particle Swarm Optimization · Bioinform. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

particle swarm optimization · 0.9machine learning · 0.9feature explanation · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Prediction of gene expression using histone modification patterns extracted by Particle Swarm Optimization
abstract
MOTIVATION: Histone modifications play an important role in transcription regulation. Although the general importance of some histone modifications for transcription regulation has been previously established, the relevance of others and their interaction is subject to ongoing research. By training Machine Learning models to predict a gene's expression and explaining their decision making process, we can get hints on how histone modifications affect transcription. In previous studies, trained models were either hardly explainable or the models were trained solely on the abundance of histone modifications. Based on other studies, which used histone modification patterns, rather than their abundance, to identify potential regulatory elements, we hypothesize the histone modification pattern in a gene's promoter to be more predictive for gene expression. We used an optimization algorithm to extract predictive histone modification profiles. RESULTS: Our algorithm called PatternChrome achieved an average area under curve (AUC) score of 0.9029 over 56 samples for binary classification, outperforming all previous algorithms for the same task. We explained the models decisions to deduce the effect of specific features, certain histone modifications or promoter positions on transcription regulation. Although the predictive histone modification patterns were extracted for each sample separately, they can be used to predict gene expression in other samples, implying that the created patterns are largely generalizable. Interestingly, the impact of histone modifications on gene regulation appears predominantly indifferent to cellular specificity. Through explanation of the classifier's decisions, we substantiate established literature knowledge while concurrently revealing novel insights into the intricate landscape of transcriptional regulation via histone modification. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code for the PatternChrome algorithm, the scripts for the analyses and the required data can be found at (https://gitlab.gwdg.de/MedBioinf/generegulation/patternchrome).
Niels Benjamin Paul, Jonas C. Wolber, Malte Lennart Sahrhage, Tim Beißbarth, Martin Haubrock
Bioinform.2
2025 Multimodal large language models and mechanistic modeling for glucose forecasting in type 1 diabetes patients
abstract
INTRODUCTION: Management of type 1 Diabetes remains a significant challenge as blood glucose levels can fluctuate dramatically and are highly individual. We introduce an innovative approach that combines multimodal Large Language models (mLLMs), mechanistic modeling of individual glucose metabolism and machine learning (ML) for forecasting blood glucose levels. METHODS: This study uses the D1NAMO dataset (6 patients with meal images) to demonstrate mLLM integration for glucose prediction. An mLLM (Pixtral Large) was employed to estimate macronutrients from meal images, providing automated meal analysis without manual food logging. We compare three distinct approaches: (1) Baseline using only glucose dynamics and basic insulin features, (2) LastMeal providing additional information about the last meal ingested by the patient, and (3) Bézier incorporating mechanistically modeled temporal features using optimized cubic Bézier curves to model temporal impacts of individual macronutrients on blood glucose. The modeled feature impacts served as input features for a LightGBM model. We also validate the mechanistic modeling component on the AZT1D dataset (24 patients with structured carbohydrate and correction insulin logs). RESULTS: The Bézier approach achieved the best performance across both datasets: D1NAMO RMSE of 15.06 at 30 min and 28.15 at 60 min; AZT1D RMSE of 16.61 at 30 min and 24.58 at 60 min. One-way ANOVA revealed statistically significant differences across prediction horizons of 45 to 120 min for the AZT1D dataset. Patient-specific Bézier curves revealed distinct metabolic response patterns: simple sugars peaked at 0.74 h, complex sugars at 3.07 h, and proteins at 4.36 h post-ingestion. Feature importance analysis showed temporal evolution from glucose change dominance to macronutrient prominence at longer horizons. Patient-specific modeling uncovered individual metabolic signatures with varying nutritional sensitivity and circadian influences. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the potential of combining mLLMs with mechanistic modeling for personalized diabetes management. The optimized Bézier curve approach provides superior temporal mapping while patient-specific models reveal individual metabolic signatures essential for personalized care.
Jonas C. Wolber, Moein E. Samadi, Julia Sellin, Andreas Schuppert
J. Biomed. Informatics1