Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Songzhou Shi

dblp:420/7846 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-8764-0582ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program analysis · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Web and mobile security · 77% Systems and software security · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Web and mobile security
mobile security
0.912025
Parcel Mismatch Demystified: Addressing a Decade-Old Security Challenge in Android · CCS 2025
Program analysis
static analysis
0.912025
Parcel Mismatch Demystified: Addressing a Decade-Old Security Challenge in Android · CCS 2025
Program analysis › static analysis
taint analysis
0.912025
Parcel Mismatch Demystified: Addressing a Decade-Old Security Challenge in Android · CCS 2025
Systems and software security › operating system security
privilege escalation
0.312025
Parcel Mismatch Demystified: Addressing a Decade-Old Security Challenge in Android · CCS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vulnerability discovery · 1.7static analysis · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Parcel Mismatch Demystified: Addressing a Decade-Old Security Challenge in Android
abstract
Parcel Mismatch vulnerabilities in Android's Inter-Process Communication (IPC) mechanism have been a persistent security challenge for over a decade, leading to numerous privilege escalation exploits. While Google has implemented various mitigation strategies, culminating in the Lazy Bundle mechanism in Android 13, there has been no systematic analysis of these vulnerabilities and mitigations. To fill the gap, in this paper, we conduct the first comprehensive study of Parcel Mismatch vulnerabilities, proposing ParcelTaint, a new static analysis approach for detecting these issues. We develop precise models for tracking Intent and Bundle transformations across processes, enabling the discovery of new attack vectors. We reveal 10 previously unknown high-severity vulnerabilities, and 5 of them have been assigned with CVEs, including new ways to bypass existing mitigations and new attack chains in system services. All of them have been confirmed. We find that Parcel Mismatch remains a significant security concern, particularly for Android versions prior to 13 and for Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) implementing custom system components. Based on our findings, Google has revised its security strategy to address core vulnerability patterns rather than relying solely on system-level mitigations. The study provides crucial insights for improving Android's IPC security and highlights the importance of systematic analysis in addressing long-standing security challenges.
Hao Zhou 0043, Songzhou Shi, Yanjie Zhao 0001, Haoyu Wang 0001
CCS3