Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Songzhou Shi
dblp:420/7846
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-8764-0582ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program analysis · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Web and mobile security · 77% Systems and software security · 23% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Web and mobile security
mobile security |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Parcel Mismatch Demystified: Addressing a Decade-Old Security Challenge in Android · CCS 2025 |
Program analysis
static analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Parcel Mismatch Demystified: Addressing a Decade-Old Security Challenge in Android · CCS 2025 |
Program analysis › static analysis
taint analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Parcel Mismatch Demystified: Addressing a Decade-Old Security Challenge in Android · CCS 2025 |
Systems and software security › operating system security
privilege escalation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Parcel Mismatch Demystified: Addressing a Decade-Old Security Challenge in Android · CCS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
vulnerability discovery · 1.7static analysis · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Parcel Mismatch Demystified: Addressing a Decade-Old Security Challenge in AndroidabstractParcel Mismatch vulnerabilities in Android's Inter-Process Communication (IPC) mechanism have been a persistent security challenge for over a decade, leading to numerous privilege escalation exploits. While Google has implemented various mitigation strategies, culminating in the Lazy Bundle mechanism in Android 13, there has been no systematic analysis of these vulnerabilities and mitigations. To fill the gap, in this paper, we conduct the first comprehensive study of Parcel Mismatch vulnerabilities, proposing ParcelTaint, a new static analysis approach for detecting these issues. We develop precise models for tracking Intent and Bundle transformations across processes, enabling the discovery of new attack vectors. We reveal 10 previously unknown high-severity vulnerabilities, and 5 of them have been assigned with CVEs, including new ways to bypass existing mitigations and new attack chains in system services. All of them have been confirmed. We find that Parcel Mismatch remains a significant security concern, particularly for Android versions prior to 13 and for Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) implementing custom system components. Based on our findings, Google has revised its security strategy to address core vulnerability patterns rather than relying solely on system-level mitigations. The study provides crucial insights for improving Android's IPC security and highlights the importance of systematic analysis in addressing long-standing security challenges. Hao Zhou 0043, Songzhou Shi, Yanjie Zhao 0001, Haoyu Wang 0001 |
CCS | 3 |