EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Oytun Kuday Duran
dblp:420/7856
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0002-1785-956XORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Hardware security and side channels · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Memory systems · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hardware security and side channels › trusted execution environments
Intel SGX |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | WireTap: Breaking Server SGX via DRAM Bus Interposition · CCS 2025 |
Hardware security and side channels
physical attacks |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | WireTap: Breaking Server SGX via DRAM Bus Interposition · CCS 2025 |
Hardware security and side channels
trusted execution environments |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | WireTap: Breaking Server SGX via DRAM Bus Interposition · CCS 2025 |
Memory systems
DRAM |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | WireTap: Breaking Server SGX via DRAM Bus Interposition · CCS 2025 |
Hardware security and side channels
hardware attacks |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | WireTap: Breaking Server SGX via DRAM Bus Interposition · CCS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
DRAM bus interposition · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | WireTap: Breaking Server SGX via DRAM Bus InterpositionabstractIntel's Software Guard eXtension (SGX) aims to offer strong integrity and confidentiality properties, even in the presence of root-level attackers. However, while Intel clearly indicates that SGX offers no security against attackers with physical access, many current real world SGX deployments are actually done in potentially adversarial environments, where node operators have a financial incentive to subvert computations performed inside SGX enclaves. While the two threat models clearly differ, a common conception is that physical attacks on SGX require expensive laboratory equipment, thus putting them out of reach of hobbyist-level attackers. Alexander Seto, Oytun Kuday Duran, Samy Amer, Jalen Chuang, Stephan van Schaik, Daniel Genkin, Christina Garman |
CCS | 2 |