Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Oytun Kuday Duran

dblp:420/7856 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0002-1785-956XORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Hardware security and side channels · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Memory systems · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware security and side channels › trusted execution environments
Intel SGX
0.912025
WireTap: Breaking Server SGX via DRAM Bus Interposition · CCS 2025
Hardware security and side channels
physical attacks
0.912025
WireTap: Breaking Server SGX via DRAM Bus Interposition · CCS 2025
Hardware security and side channels
trusted execution environments
0.912025
WireTap: Breaking Server SGX via DRAM Bus Interposition · CCS 2025
Memory systems
DRAM
0.912025
WireTap: Breaking Server SGX via DRAM Bus Interposition · CCS 2025
Hardware security and side channels
hardware attacks
0.312025
WireTap: Breaking Server SGX via DRAM Bus Interposition · CCS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

DRAM bus interposition · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 WireTap: Breaking Server SGX via DRAM Bus Interposition
abstract
Intel's Software Guard eXtension (SGX) aims to offer strong integrity and confidentiality properties, even in the presence of root-level attackers. However, while Intel clearly indicates that SGX offers no security against attackers with physical access, many current real world SGX deployments are actually done in potentially adversarial environments, where node operators have a financial incentive to subvert computations performed inside SGX enclaves. While the two threat models clearly differ, a common conception is that physical attacks on SGX require expensive laboratory equipment, thus putting them out of reach of hobbyist-level attackers.
Alexander Seto, Oytun Kuday Duran, Samy Amer, Jalen Chuang, Stephan van Schaik, Daniel Genkin, Christina Garman
CCS2