Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dorian Pacaud
dblp:420/7873
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0006-6976-4959ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Computational complexity · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security
proof-of-work blockchain |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mining in Logarithmic Space with Variable Difficulty · CCS 2025 |
Computational complexity › descriptive complexity
succinctness |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Mining in Logarithmic Space with Variable Difficulty · CCS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
non-interactive proofs of proof-of-work · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mining in Logarithmic Space with Variable DifficultyabstractThis paper presents the first non-interactive, succinct, and secure representation of a PoW-based blockchain that operates under variable mining difficulty while satisfying both completeness and onlineness properties. Completeness ensures that provers can update an existing NIPoPoW by incorporating a newly mined block, whereas onlineness ensures that miners can extend the chain directly from a NIPoPoW. The time complexity for both the prover (to update a NIPoPoW with a new block) and the verifier is logarithmic in the number of blocks of the underlying PoW blockchain. The communication complexity required for synchronization is polylogarithmic in the length of the blockchain. We prove the correctness of our scheme in the presence of a 1/3-bounded PPT adversary. Loïc Miller, Dorian Pacaud, Nathanël Derousseaux-Lebert, Emmanuelle Anceaume, Romaric Ludinard |
CCS | 2 |