Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nathanël Derousseaux-Lebert

dblp:420/7893 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0000-4655-9203ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational complexity · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security
proof-of-work blockchain
0.912025
Mining in Logarithmic Space with Variable Difficulty · CCS 2025
Computational complexity › descriptive complexity
succinctness
0.312025
Mining in Logarithmic Space with Variable Difficulty · CCS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

non-interactive proofs of proof-of-work · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Mining in Logarithmic Space with Variable Difficulty
abstract
This paper presents the first non-interactive, succinct, and secure representation of a PoW-based blockchain that operates under variable mining difficulty while satisfying both completeness and onlineness properties. Completeness ensures that provers can update an existing NIPoPoW by incorporating a newly mined block, whereas onlineness ensures that miners can extend the chain directly from a NIPoPoW. The time complexity for both the prover (to update a NIPoPoW with a new block) and the verifier is logarithmic in the number of blocks of the underlying PoW blockchain. The communication complexity required for synchronization is polylogarithmic in the length of the blockchain. We prove the correctness of our scheme in the presence of a 1/3-bounded PPT adversary.
Loïc Miller, Dorian Pacaud, Nathanël Derousseaux-Lebert, Emmanuelle Anceaume, Romaric Ludinard
CCS3