Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Glenn C. Turner
dblp:421/0312
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program synthesis and code generation · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program synthesis and code generation › neural program synthesis
LLM-based program synthesis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Discovering Symbolic Cognitive Models from Human and Animal Behavior · ICML 2025 |
Computational science and engineering › computational cognitive science
cognitive modeling |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Discovering Symbolic Cognitive Models from Human and Animal Behavior · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 1.7evolutionary algorithm · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Discovering Symbolic Cognitive Models from Human and Animal BehaviorabstractSymbolic models play a key role in cognitive science, expressing computationally precise hypotheses about how the brain implements a cognitive process. Identifying an appropriate model typically requires a great deal of effort and ingenuity on the part of a human scientist.
Here, we adapt FunSearch (Romera-Paredes et al. 2024), a recently developed tool that uses Large Language Models (LLMs) in an evolutionary algorithm, to automatically discover symbolic cognitive models that accurately capture human and animal behavior.
We consider datasets from three species performing a classic reward-learning task that has been the focus of substantial modeling effort, and find that the discovered programs outperform state-of-the-art cognitive models for each.
The discovered programs can readily be interpreted as hypotheses about human and animal cognition, instantiating interpretable symbolic learning and decision-making algorithms. Broadly, these results demonstrate the viability of using LLM-powered program synthesis to propose novel scientific hypotheses regarding mechanisms of human and animal cognition. Pablo Samuel Castro, Nenad Tomasev, Ankit Anand, Navodita Sharma, Rishika Mohanta, Aparna Dev, Kuba Perlin, Siddhant Jain, Kyle Levin, Noémi Élteto, Will Dabney, Alexander Novikov 0001, Glenn C. Turner, Maria K. Eckstein, Nathaniel D. Daw, Kevin J. Miller, Kimberly L. Stachenfeld |
ICML | 13 |