Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Peter Blohm

dblp:421/0451 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 62% Web and social media mining · 38%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Approximation and online algorithms · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
0.912025
Probably Approximately Global Robustness Certification · ICML 2025
Data mining › structured data mining
graph mining
0.912025
Discovering Opinion Intervals from Conflicts in Signed Graphs · NeurIPS 2025
Web and social media mining › social network analysis
signed network analysis
0.912025
Discovering Opinion Intervals from Conflicts in Signed Graphs · NeurIPS 2025
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
0.912025
Discovering Opinion Intervals from Conflicts in Signed Graphs · NeurIPS 2025
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation schemes
polynomial-time approximation scheme
0.912025
Discovering Opinion Intervals from Conflicts in Signed Graphs · NeurIPS 2025
Data mining
clustering
0.312025
Discovering Opinion Intervals from Conflicts in Signed Graphs · NeurIPS 2025
Data mining › clustering › graph clustering
correlation clustering
0.312025
Discovering Opinion Intervals from Conflicts in Signed Graphs · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

interval graph · 1.7correlation clustering · 1.7approximation algorithm · 1.7local robustness oracle · 0.9epsilon-net sampling · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Probably Approximately Global Robustness Certification
abstract
We propose and investigate probabilistic guarantees for the adversarial robustness of classification algorithms. While traditional formal verification approaches for robustness are intractable and sampling-based approaches do not provide formal guarantees, our approach is able to efficiently certify a probabilistic relaxation of robustness. The key idea is to sample an $\epsilon$-net and invoke a local robustness oracle on the sample. Remarkably, the size of the sample needed to achieve probably approximately global robustness guarantees is independent of the input dimensionality, the number of classes, and the learning algorithm itself. Our approach can, therefore, be applied even to large neural networks that are beyond the scope of traditional formal verification. Experiments empirically confirm that it characterizes robustness better than state-of-the-art sampling-based approaches and scales better than formal methods.
Peter Blohm, Patrick Indri, Thomas Gärtner 0001, Sagar Malhotra
ICML1
2025 Discovering Opinion Intervals from Conflicts in Signed Graphs
abstract
Online social media provide a platform for people to discuss current events and exchange opinions with their peers. While interactions are predominantly positive, in recent years, there has been a lot of research to understand the conflicts in social networks and how they are based on different views and opinions. In this paper, we ask whether the conflicts in a network reveal a small and interpretable set of prevalent opinion ranges that explain the users' interactions. More precisely, we consider signed graphs, where the edge signs indicate positive and negative interactions of node pairs, and our goal is to infer opinion intervals that are consistent with the edge signs. We introduce an optimization problem that models this question, and we give strong hardness results and a polynomial-time approximation scheme by utilizing connections to interval graphs and the Correlation Clustering problem. We further provide scalable heuristics and show that in experiments they yield more expressive solutions than Correlation Clustering baselines. We also present a case study on a novel real-world dataset from the German parliament, showing that our algorithms can recover the political leaning of German parties based on co-voting behavior.
Peter Blohm, Florian Chen, Aristides Gionis, Stefan Neumann 0003
NeurIPS1