Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Emma Saarinen
dblp:421/0551
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 70% Approximation and online algorithms · 30% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Scalable Approximation Algorithms for p-Wasserstein Distance and Its Variants · ICML 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Scalable Approximation Algorithms for p-Wasserstein Distance and Its Variants · ICML 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport
wasserstein distance approximation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Scalable Approximation Algorithms for p-Wasserstein Distance and Its Variants · ICML 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
primal-dual method |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Scalable Approximation Algorithms for p-Wasserstein Distance and Its Variants · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
primal-dual method · 0.9hierarchical well-separated trees · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Scalable Approximation Algorithms for p-Wasserstein Distance and Its VariantsabstractThe $p$-Wasserstein distance measures the cost of optimally transporting one distribution to another, where the cost of moving a unit mass from $a$ to $b$ is the $p^{th}$ power of the ground distance $\mathrm{d}(a,b)$ between them.
Despite its strong theoretical properties, its use in practice -- especially for $p \ge 2$ -- is limited due to two key challenges: sensitivity to noise and a lack of scalable algorithms.
We identify noise sensitivity as a key reason why some existing approximation algorithms for $p=1$ fail to generalize to $p \ge 2$ and then present new algorithms for approximating the $p$-Wasserstein distance and its variant. First, when $\mathrm{d}(\cdot,\cdot)$ is a metric, for any constant $p \ge 2$, we present a novel relative $O(\log n)$-approximation algorithm to compute the $p$-Wasserstein distance between any two discrete distributions of size $n$. The algorithm runs in $O(n^2 \log U\log \Delta\log n)$ time, where $\log U$ is the bit-length of the input probabilities and $\Delta$ is the ratio of the largest to the smallest pairwise distance.
We use $p$ hierarchically well-separated trees to define a distance that approximates the $p$-Wasserstein cost within a factor of $O(\log n)$ and then present a simple primal-dual algorithm to compute the $p$-Wasserstein cost with respect to this distance.
Second, due to the noise sensitivity of the $p$-Wasserstein distance, we show that existing combinatorial approaches require $\Omega(n^2/\delta^p)$ time to approximate the $p$-Wasserstein distance within an additive error of $\delta$. In contrast, we show that, for any arbitrary distance $\mathrm{d}(\cdot,\cdot)$, a recent noise-resistant variant of the $p$-Wasserstein distance, called the $p$-RPW distance, can be approximated in $O(n^2/\delta^3)$ time. Nathaniel Lahn, Sharath Raghvendra, Emma Saarinen, Pouyan Shirzadian |
ICML | 3 |