Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Elizaveta Nesterova

dblp:422/0147 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Information theory · 30% Computational geometry · 30% Algorithms and data structures · 26%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical estimation
1.012026
Optimal Reconstruction from Linear Queries · COLT 2026
Information theory › signal processing
signal recovery
1.012026
Optimal Reconstruction from Linear Queries · COLT 2026
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving data access
0.912025
Reconstruction and Secrecy under Approximate Distance Queries · NeurIPS 2025
Algorithms and data structures
metric embedding
0.912025
Reconstruction and Secrecy under Approximate Distance Queries · NeurIPS 2025
Graph algorithms and graph theory › distance oracle
approximate distance queries
0.312025
Reconstruction and Secrecy under Approximate Distance Queries · NeurIPS 2025
Computational complexity
query complexity
0.312025
Reconstruction and Secrecy under Approximate Distance Queries · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

lie group actions · 2.0metric space analysis · 1.7learning theory · 1.7chebyshev radius · 1.7geometric arguments · 1.0geometric argument · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Optimal Reconstruction from Linear Queries
abstract
We study the problem of reconstructing an unknown point in $\mathbb{R}^d$ from approximate linear queries. This setting arises naturally in applications ranging from low-dimensional remote sensing and signal recovery to high-dimensional data analysis and privacy-sensitive inference. Our main goal is to characterize the optimal \emph{reconstruction error} as a function of the number of queries $T$, the ambient dimension $d$, and the noise parameter $\delta$. We first analyze the limit $T \to \infty$ and show that the optimal reconstruction error converges to the explicit value $\sqrt{2d/(d+1)}\,\delta$, which plays a role analogous to the Bayes optimal error in supervised learning. When the dimension is fixed, we show that the excess error above this limit decays \emph{doubly exponentially} fast as $T \to \infty$, a rate that is significantly faster than those typically encountered in learning curves. When the dimension grows, we show that a number of queries on the order of $\exp(d)$ is necessary and sufficient to achieve vanishing excess error. Finally, we introduce and analyze an improper variant of the reconstruction problem. From a technical perspective, our main contribution is a generalization of Jung’s theorem (1901). The classical theorem bounds the maximum possible radius of a set of diameter 1 and characterizes extremal bodies. Our generalization provides a robust variant that characterizes near-extremal bodies and is proved via geometric and dynamical arguments exploiting symmetry and Lie group actions.
Yuval Filmus, Shay Moran, Elizaveta Nesterova
COLT3
2025 Reconstruction and Secrecy under Approximate Distance Queries
abstract
Consider the task of locating an unknown target point using approximate distance queries: in each round, a reconstructor selects a reference point and receives a noisy version of its distance to the target. This problem arises naturally in various contexts—from localization in GPS and sensor networks to privacy-aware data access—making it relevant from the perspective of both the reconstructor (seeking accurate recovery) and the responder (aiming to limit information disclosure, e.g., for privacy or security reasons). We study this reconstruction game through a learning-theoretic lens, focusing on the rate and limits of the best possible reconstruction error. Our first result provides a tight geometric characterization of the optimal error in terms of the Chebyshev radius, a classical concept from geometry. This characterization applies to all compact metric spaces (in fact, to all totally bounded spaces) and yields explicit formulas for natural subsets of the Euclidean metric. Our second result addresses the asymptotic behavior of reconstruction, distinguishing between pseudo-finite spaces, where the optimal error is attained after finitely many queries, and spaces where the approximation curve exhibits a nontrivial decay. We characterize pseudo-finiteness for convex subsets of Euclidean spaces.
Shay Moran, Elizaveta Nesterova
NeurIPS2