Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Qingsheng Qiu
dblp:422/4706
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation › physical design › layout pattern analysis
layout pattern matching |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | An Efficient Algorithm for Exact SRAM Verification via Novel Pattern-Matching Techniques · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2026 |
Electronic design automation › physical design
layout verification |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | An Efficient Algorithm for Exact SRAM Verification via Novel Pattern-Matching Techniques · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2026 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
pattern matching |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | An Efficient Algorithm for Exact SRAM Verification via Novel Pattern-Matching Techniques · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2026 |
Electronic design automation
physical design |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | An Efficient Algorithm for Exact SRAM Verification via Novel Pattern-Matching Techniques · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spatial indexing · 1.0overlap detection · 1.0localization techniques · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | An Efficient Algorithm for Exact SRAM Verification via Novel Pattern-Matching TechniquesabstractAs semiconductor manufacturing advances into ultra-scaled technology nodes, Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) verification faces critical challenges stemming from increasingly stringent geometries, heightened process variability, and the sheer density of contemporary designs. Existing methodologies, notably Design Rule Checking and conventional pattern matching, often fall short in capturing the intricate multilayer interactions and subtle geometric deviations characteristic of advanced SRAM layouts. These limitations can lead to missed layout anomalies and potential functional failures, resulting in diminished yield. This paper introduces a specialized pattern-matching-based algorithm designed to address these challenges in SRAM verification. The algorithm integrates novel localization techniques, efficient spatial indexing, and an overlap detection procedure that together achieve exact verification while delivering substantial improvements in runtime performance. Experimental results confirm that this approach not only maintains 100% detection accuracy on complex SRAM benchmarks but also achieves speedups ranging from threefold to over twentyfold compared to state-of-the-art methods, and from twofold to several thousandfold on classic single-layer pattern matching datasets. Sunkanghong Wang, Qingsheng Qiu, Hao Zhang 0068, Lijun Wei, Qiang Liu 0031 |
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. | 2 |
| 2025 | GeoFA: A Geometric Finite Automaton Engine for Efficient Layout Pattern MatchingabstractAs Integrated Circuit (IC) design complexity increases exponentially, Layout Pattern Matching (LPM) has become a critical technique for physical verification, yet faces significant challenges in efficiency and accuracy. This paper presents a high-performance two-stage LPM framework centered around the innovative GeoFA (Geometric Finite Automaton) engine. The first stage successfully applies Deterministic Finite Automaton (DFA) theory for the first time to 2D layout pattern matching with geometric tolerances, enabling rapid candidate region screening with near-linear time complexity. The second stage then performs precise geometric verification, leveraging optimized spatial indexing, robust Boolean operations, and specific optimizations for cell arrays, to guarantee 100% sign-off accuracy. Experimental results demonstrate that the framework achieves 100% accuracy across diverse layouts. On standard benchmarks, it provides a speedup of approximately 1.7x over state-of-the-art academic work. Furthermore, compared to the industry-standard tool Calibre, it delivers average speedups of up to 201.7x and 22.9x on complex single-layer and cell-level matching tasks, respectively, demonstrating exceptional performance and scalability. Qingsheng Qiu, Ziwen Zheng, Boyu Shi |
ICCAD | 1 |