Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Oriol Ricart

dblp:422/6433 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 38% Language models and text generation · 38% Multi-agent systems · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment
1.012026
Multi-objective reinforcement learning for provably incentivising alignment with value systems · Artif. Intell. 2026
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-objective reinforcement learning
1.012026
Multi-objective reinforcement learning for provably incentivising alignment with value systems · Artif. Intell. 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
autonomous agents
0.312026
Multi-objective reinforcement learning for provably incentivising alignment with value systems · Artif. Intell. 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
ethical behavior
0.312026
Multi-objective reinforcement learning for provably incentivising alignment with value systems · Artif. Intell. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

linear programming · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Multi-objective reinforcement learning for provably incentivising alignment with value systems
abstract
This paper addresses the problem of ensuring that autonomous learning agents align with multiple moral values. Specifically, we present the theoretical principles and algorithmic tools necessary for creating an environment where we ensure that the agent learns a behaviour aligned with multiple moral values while striving to achieve its individual objective. To address this value alignment problem, we adopt the Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning framework and propose a novel algorithm that combines techniques from Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Linear Programming. In addition, we illustrate our value alignment process with an example involving an autonomous vehicle. Here, we demonstrate that the agent learns to behave in alignment with the ethical values of safety, achievement, and comfort, with achievement representing the agent’s individual objective. Such ethical behaviour differs depending on the ordering between values. We also use a synthetic multi-objective environment to evaluate the computational costs of guaranteeing ethical learning as the number of values increases.
Manel Rodriguez-Soto, Roxana Radulescu, Filippo Bistaffa, Oriol Ricart, Arnau Mayoral-Macau, Maite López-Sánchez, Juan A. Rodríguez-Aguilar, Ann Nowé
Artif. Intell.4