Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alexandra Daniela Damir
dblp:423/5017
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Malware analysis · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Malware analysis
malware classification |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | AutoMalDesc: Large-Scale Script Analysis for Cyber Threat Research · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
synthetic data generation · 1.0self-paced learning · 1.0large language model · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | AutoMalDesc: Large-Scale Script Analysis for Cyber Threat ResearchabstractGenerating thorough natural language explanations for threat detections remains an open problem in cybersecurity research, despite significant advances in automated malware detection systems. In this work, we present AutoMalDesc, an automated static analysis summarization framework that, following initial training on a small set of expert-curated examples, operates independently at scale. This approach leverages an iterative self-paced learning pipeline to progressively enhance output quality through synthetic data generation and validation cycles, eliminating the need for extensive manual data annotation. Evaluation across 3,600 diverse samples in five scripting languages demonstrates statistically significant improvements between iterations, showing consistent gains in both summary quality and classification accuracy. Our comprehensive validation approach combines quantitative metrics based on established malware labels with qualitative assessment from both human experts and LLM-based judges, confirming both technical precision and linguistic coherence of generated summaries. To facilitate reproducibility and advance research in this domain, we publish our complete dataset of more than 100K script samples, including annotated seed (900) and test (3.6K) datasets, along with our methodology and evaluation framework. Alexandru-Mihai Apostu, Andrei Preda, Alexandra Daniela Damir, Diana Bolocan, Radu Tudor Ionescu, Ioana Croitoru, Mihaela Gaman |
AAAI | 3 |