Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Peilai Yu

dblp:423/8098 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 95% Trustworthy machine learning · 5%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text correction › spelling correction
chinese spelling check
1.012026
CEC-Zero: Zero-Supervision Character Error Correction with Self-Generated Rewards · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text correction
spelling correction
1.012026
CEC-Zero: Zero-Supervision Character Error Correction with Self-Generated Rewards · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment
0.912025
Whose Instructions Count? Resolving Preference Bias in Instruction Fine-Tuning · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction tuning
0.912025
Whose Instructions Count? Resolving Preference Bias in Instruction Fine-Tuning · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model fine-tuning
0.912025
Whose Instructions Count? Resolving Preference Bias in Instruction Fine-Tuning · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.312026
CEC-Zero: Zero-Supervision Character Error Correction with Self-Generated Rewards · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning
self-correction
0.312026
CEC-Zero: Zero-Supervision Character Error Correction with Self-Generated Rewards · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.312025
Whose Instructions Count? Resolving Preference Bias in Instruction Fine-Tuning · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-generated reward · 1.0reinforcement learning · 1.0PPO · 1.0preference correction module · 0.9cross-layer prefix alignment · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 CEC-Zero: Zero-Supervision Character Error Correction with Self-Generated Rewards
abstract
Large-scale Chinese spelling correction (CSC) remains critical for real-world text processing, yet existing LLMs and supervised methods lack robustness to novel errors and rely on costly annotations. We introduce CEC-Zero, a zerosupervision reinforcement learning framework that addresses this by enabling LLMs to correct their own mistakes. CEC-Zero synthesizes errorful inputs from clean text, computes cluster-consensus rewards via semantic similarity and candidate agreement, and optimizes the policy with PPO. It outperforms supervised baselines by 10–13 F1 points and strong LLM fine-tunes by 5–8 points across 9 benchmarks, with theoretical guarantees of unbiased rewards and convergence.CEC-Zero establishes a label-free paradigm for robust, scalable CSC, unlocking LLM potential in noisy text pipelines.
Zhiming Lin 0001, Sophie Zhang, Peilai Yu, Canran Xiao
AAAI4
2025 Multi-Scale Volumetric Transformers with Adaptive Uncertainty Modeling for Robust Bacterial Flagellar Motor Localization in Cryo-Electron Tomography
abstract
Automated identification of bacterial flagellar motors in cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET) remains a significant challenge due to low signal-to-noise ratios, imaging artifacts, and the complexity of capturing both local and global structural contexts. In this work, we propose MSVT+AUM, a hybrid framework that combines a Multi-Scale Volumetric Transformer (MSVT) with Adaptive Uncertainty Modeling (AUM) to address these limitations. MSVT employs a 3D ResNet-50 backbone to extract hierarchical volumetric features, which are integrated through a volume-level self-attention mechanism and refined via 3D Vision Transformer blocks with positional encoding. To enhance discriminative capability in densely packed molecular environments, we introduce a Contextual Spatial Attention module that adaptively reweights spatial and channel-wise representations. To reduce false positives and provide calibrated confidence estimates, AUM jointly models aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties using heteroscedastic regression and Monte Carlo dropout, with detection thresholds dynamically adjusted based on uncertainty estimates. Evaluation on the BYU flagellar motor dataset and an extended subset of the CryoET Data Portal shows that our method achieves an F 2 score of 0.891, representing a 1.5 % improvement over existing approaches, while reducing in-ference time by 23%. MSVT+AUM exhibits robust generalization across diverse bacterial species and noise conditions, offering a scalable and reliable solution for high-throughput structural analysis in cryo-ET.
Junqiao Wang, Yangfan He, Xinyuan Song 0002, Peilai Yu, Xunfei Zhu
BIBM5
2025 Whose Instructions Count? Resolving Preference Bias in Instruction Fine-Tuning
abstract
Instruction fine-tuning (IFT) has emerged as a ubiquitous strategy for specializing large language models (LLMs), yet it implicitly assumes a single, coherent "ground-truth" preference behind all human-written instructions. In practice, annotators differ in the styles, emphases, and granularities they prefer, introducing preference bias that can erode both robustness and generalization. We propose Dynamic Cross-Layer Preference Correction (\textsc{DCPC}), it couples (i) a preference-sensitive similarity estimator that detects mismatched instructional cues, (ii) cross-layer prefix alignment to reconcile semantic representations across transformer layers, and (iii) a lightweight Preference Correction Module (PCM) that dynamically adjusts hidden states to honor the inferred dominant preference. On five Super/GLUE tasks and the Alpaca set—plus six preference-shifted variants—DCPC boosts accuracy/F1-EM by 4.0–6.7 points and gpt-score by +0.7, while cutting inter-seed variance up to 35% on LlaMA-2 13B and Mistral-7B, setting a new state of the art for robust instruction tuning.
Changbang Li, Yinan Peng, Weihao Luo, Peilai Yu
NeurIPS5