Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrew Tinits
dblp:424/4597
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-7593-3356ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 67% Rendering · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Image and video processing › image restoration
denoising |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Nonlinear Noise2Noise for Efficient Monte Carlo Denoiser Training · SIGGRAPH Asia 2025 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
image denoising |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Nonlinear Noise2Noise for Efficient Monte Carlo Denoiser Training · SIGGRAPH Asia 2025 |
Rendering
monte carlo rendering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Nonlinear Noise2Noise for Efficient Monte Carlo Denoiser Training · SIGGRAPH Asia 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
nonlinear function analysis · 0.9noise2noise · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Nonlinear Noise2Noise for Efficient Monte Carlo Denoiser TrainingabstractThe Noise2Noise method allows for training machine learning-based denoisers with pairs of input and target images where both the input and target can be noisy. This removes the need for training with clean target images, which can be difficult to obtain. However, Noise2Noise training has a major limitation: nonlinear functions applied to the noisy targets will skew the results. This bias occurs because the nonlinearity makes the expected value of the noisy targets different from the clean target image. Since nonlinear functions are common in image processing, avoiding them limits the types of preprocessing that can be performed on the noisy targets. Our main insight is that certain nonlinear functions can be applied to the noisy targets without adding significant bias to the results. We develop a theoretical framework for analyzing the effects of these nonlinearities, and describe a class of nonlinear functions with minimal bias. Andrew Tinits, Stephen Mann |
SIGGRAPH Asia | 1 |