Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Maya Swisa

dblp:424/5218 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability › SAT solving
branching heuristic
1.012026
Learning to Split: A Reinforcement-Learning-Guided Splitting Heuristic for Neural Network Verification (Invited Talk) · CAV (1) 2026
Automated reasoning and model checking
neural network verification
1.012026
Learning to Split: A Reinforcement-Learning-Guided Splitting Heuristic for Neural Network Verification (Invited Talk) · CAV (1) 2026
Automated reasoning and model checking
satisfiability
0.312026
Learning to Split: A Reinforcement-Learning-Guided Splitting Heuristic for Neural Network Verification (Invited Talk) · CAV (1) 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 1.0deep q-learning from demonstrations · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Learning to Split: A Reinforcement-Learning-Guided Splitting Heuristic for Neural Network Verification (Invited Talk)
abstract
Abstract Modern neural network verifiers often encode neural network verification as constraint satisfaction problems. When dealing with standard piecewise-linear activation functions, such as ReLUs, verifiers typically employ branching heuristics that break a complex constraint satisfaction problem into multiple, simpler problems. The verifier’s performance depends heavily on the order in which this branching is performed: a poor selection may give rise to exponentially many sub-problems, hampering scalability. Here, we focus on the setting in which many related verification queries must be solved for the same neural network. The core idea is to use past experience to make good branching decisions, expediting verification. We present a reinforcement-learning-based branching heuristic that achieves this, by applying Deep Q-learning from Demonstrations (DQfD). Our experimental evaluation demonstrates a substantial reduction in average verification time and in the average number of iterations required, compared to modern splitting heuristics. These results highlight the great potential of reinforcement learning in the context of neural network verification.
Maya Swisa, Guy Katz
CAV (1)1