Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Maya Swisa
dblp:424/5218
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability › SAT solving
branching heuristic |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Learning to Split: A Reinforcement-Learning-Guided Splitting Heuristic for Neural Network Verification (Invited Talk) · CAV (1) 2026 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
neural network verification |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Learning to Split: A Reinforcement-Learning-Guided Splitting Heuristic for Neural Network Verification (Invited Talk) · CAV (1) 2026 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
satisfiability |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Learning to Split: A Reinforcement-Learning-Guided Splitting Heuristic for Neural Network Verification (Invited Talk) · CAV (1) 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 1.0deep q-learning from demonstrations · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Learning to Split: A Reinforcement-Learning-Guided Splitting Heuristic for Neural Network Verification (Invited Talk)abstractAbstract Modern neural network verifiers often encode neural network verification as constraint satisfaction problems. When dealing with standard piecewise-linear activation functions, such as ReLUs, verifiers typically employ branching heuristics that break a complex constraint satisfaction problem into multiple, simpler problems. The verifier’s performance depends heavily on the order in which this branching is performed: a poor selection may give rise to exponentially many sub-problems, hampering scalability. Here, we focus on the setting in which many related verification queries must be solved for the same neural network. The core idea is to use past experience to make good branching decisions, expediting verification. We present a reinforcement-learning-based branching heuristic that achieves this, by applying Deep Q-learning from Demonstrations (DQfD). Our experimental evaluation demonstrates a substantial reduction in average verification time and in the average number of iterations required, compared to modern splitting heuristics. These results highlight the great potential of reinforcement learning in the context of neural network verification. Maya Swisa, Guy Katz |
CAV (1) | 1 |