Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Linghan Fang
dblp:425/1945
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Embedded and real-time systems · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Speech recognition and synthesis · 67% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 33% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
automatic speech recognition |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Boosting ASR Robustness via Test-Time Reinforcement Learning with Audio-Text Semantic Rewards · AAAI 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › automatic speech recognition
robust speech recognition |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Boosting ASR Robustness via Test-Time Reinforcement Learning with Audio-Text Semantic Rewards · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
test-time adaptation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Boosting ASR Robustness via Test-Time Reinforcement Learning with Audio-Text Semantic Rewards · AAAI 2026 |
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling
fixed-priority scheduling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Work-in-Progress: Learning to Refine Priority Assignment in Fixed-Priority Real-Time Scheduling · RTSS 2025 |
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling › priority scheduling
priority assignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Work-in-Progress: Learning to Refine Priority Assignment in Fixed-Priority Real-Time Scheduling · RTSS 2025 |
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time scheduling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Work-in-Progress: Learning to Refine Priority Assignment in Fixed-Priority Real-Time Scheduling · RTSS 2025 |
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling › multiprocessor scheduling
global scheduling |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Work-in-Progress: Learning to Refine Priority Assignment in Fixed-Priority Real-Time Scheduling · RTSS 2025 |
Embedded and real-time systems
multicore real-time systems |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Work-in-Progress: Learning to Refine Priority Assignment in Fixed-Priority Real-Time Scheduling · RTSS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 1.9stochastic decoding · 1.0reward model · 1.0causal intervention · 1.0policy network · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Boosting ASR Robustness via Test-Time Reinforcement Learning with Audio-Text Semantic RewardsabstractRecently, Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems (e.g., Whisper) have achieved remarkable accuracy improvements but remain highly sensitive to real-world unseen data (data with large distribution shifts), including noisy environments and diverse accents. To address this issue, test-time adaptation (TTA) has shown great potential in improving the model adaptability at inference time without ground-truth labels, and existing TTA methods often rely on pseudo-labeling or entropy minimization. However, by treating model confidence as a learning signal, these methods may reinforce high-confidence errors, leading to confirmation bias that undermines adaptation. To overcome these limitations, we present ASR-TRA, a novel Test-time Reinforcement Adaptation framework inspired by causal intervention. More precisely, our method introduces a learnable decoder prompt and utilizes temperature-controlled stochastic decoding to generate diverse transcription candidates. These are scored by a reward model that measures audio-text semantic alignment, and the resulting feedback is used to update both model and prompt parameters via reinforcement learning. Comprehensive experiments on LibriSpeech with synthetic noise and L2 Arctic accented English datasets demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art (SOTA), including SUTA and SGEM, in both accuracy and inference speed. Ablation studies further confirm the effectiveness of combining audio and language-based rewards, highlighting our method's enhanced stability and interpretability. Overall, our approach provides a practical and robust solution for deploying ASR systems in challenging real-world conditions. Linghan Fang, Tianxin Xie, Li Liu 0036 |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2025 | Work-in-Progress: Learning to Refine Priority Assignment in Fixed-Priority Real-Time SchedulingabstractWe address the problem of priority assignment for global fixed-priority scheduling on multicore real-time systems, where identifying a feasible priority ordering is a combinatorial challenge. We propose a learning-based framework that trains a lightweight policy network via reinforcement learning to refine existing priority assignments toward schedulable solutions. Based on the policy network, we propose an inference-time policy refinement mechanism that improves schedulability without additional training. It combines breadth sampling—generating candidate orderings via stochastic perturbations—with depth refinement, which iteratively enhances promising candidates. A continuous reward function based on a schedulability hazard metric enables effective training. Preliminary experiments show that the proposed method performs better than classical heuristics such as Deadline Monotonic and DkC, demonstrating its potential as an effective learning-assisted approach to real-time scheduling. Binqi Sun, Linghan Fang, Andrea Bastoni, Marco Caccamo |
RTSS | 2 |