Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Becca Bonham-Carter

dblp:425/4295 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-0163-4673ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
lineage tracing
0.812024
Cellular proliferation biases clonal lineage tracing and trajectory inference · Bioinform. 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology
single-cell analysis
0.812024
Cellular proliferation biases clonal lineage tracing and trajectory inference · Bioinform. 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis
trajectory inference
0.812024
Cellular proliferation biases clonal lineage tracing and trajectory inference · Bioinform. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.8probabilistic modeling · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Cellular proliferation biases clonal lineage tracing and trajectory inference
abstract
MOTIVATION: Lineage tracing and trajectory inference from single-cell RNA-sequencing data hold tremendous potential for uncovering the genetic programs driving development and disease. Single cell datasets are thought to provide an unbiased view on the diverse cellular architecture of tissues. Sampling bias, however, can skew single cell datasets away from the cellular composition they are meant to represent. RESULTS: We demonstrate a novel form of sampling bias, caused by a statistical phenomenon related to repeated sampling from a growing, heterogeneous population. Relative growth rates of cells influence the probability that they will be sampled in clones observed across multiple time points. We support our probabilistic derivations with a simulation study and an analysis of a real time-course of T-cell development. We find that this bias can impact fate probability predictions, and we explore how to develop trajectory inference methods which are robust to this bias. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code for the simulated datasets and to create the figures in this manuscript is freely available in python at https://github.com/rbonhamcarter/simulate-clones. A python implementation of the extension of the LineageOT method is freely available at https://github.com/rbonhamcarter/LineageOT/tree/multi-time-clones.
Becca Bonham-Carter, Geoffrey Schiebinger
Bioinform.1