Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Morten Dahlback Langfeldt

dblp:425/4586 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0006-7920-3637ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › multimedia analysis › multimedia forensics
multimedia verification
0.912025
The 2025 Grand Challenge on Multimedia Verification: Foundations and Overview · ACM Multimedia 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multimodal reasoning · 0.9large language model · 0.9forensic analysis · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 The 2025 Grand Challenge on Multimedia Verification: Foundations and Overview
abstract
The 2025 Grand Challenge on Multimedia Verification addresses the challenges of verifying the authenticity and context of online multimedia content. Participants analyzed real-world cases of images and videos, assessed their sources, detected any potential manipulations, and submitted detailed verification reports. The main competition was structured into three stages: Training, Validation, and Real-World Verification, which included live test cases and welcomed solutions ranging from manual methods and OSINT practices to automated tools and novel AI techniques. A total of 32 teams from 11 countries registered. The submitted solutions presented diverse pipelines that integrated forensic analysis, multimodal reasoning, and large language models (LLMs). The results demonstrate significant progress toward semi-automated verification workflows, while also exposing challenges in scalability, consistency, and reliability. In this paper, we present the challenge design, datasets, evaluation criteria, and participant outcomes, providing insights to guide future research and practice in multimedia verification.
Duc-Tien Dang-Nguyen, Morten Dahlback Langfeldt, Henrik Brattli Vold, Silje Førsund, Minh-Son Dao, Sohail Ahmed Khan, Kha-Luan Pham, Marc Gallofré Ocaña, Minh-Triet Tran, Anh-Duy Tran
ACM Multimedia2