Static analysis has profoundly improved software quality over the past decades, evolving from compiler-integrated optimizations and simple linting to sophisticated analyses for bug detection, security, and program understanding. In contrast, static analysis for hardware remains underexploited, resembling the early state of software analysis. Most existing hardware static analyses are confined to compiler optimizations and linting, lacking the sophistication needed to uncover complex design flaws. Furthermore, we observe that many hardware bugs reported in recent literature could have been identified by sophisticated static analyses that account for hardware-specific semantics and data flow; however, such bug detection analyses are absent today. To exploit the untapped potential of sophisticated hardware analysis, we present a series of bug detection analyses for Verilog, the predominant hardware description language (HDL). Moreover, these analyses are built upon our fundamental analyses that capture essential hardware-specific characteristics---such as bit-vector arithmetic, register synchronization, and digital component concurrency---and enable the examination of hardware data and control flows. Together, these analyses form a well-organized analysis suite with a modular design, in which diverse fundamental analyses combine to support bug detection, hardware understanding, and other potential clients. To implement these analyses, we further offer dedicated infrastructure, including a Verilog front end, an intermediate representation (IR) for analysis, and an analysis manager. To validate the utility of our analyses, we applied them to real-world hardware projects. Unlike software, real-world hardware projects tend to contain fewer but harder-to-detect bugs, as they typically undergo extensive simulation and rigorous verification to prevent the prohibitive costs of hardware defects. Despite this, our preliminary experimental results are highly promising: applying these proposed analyses to popular real-world Verilog projects (averaging 1.5K+ GitHub stars) uncovered nine previously unknown bugs, all confirmed by developers; moreover, we successfully identified a total of 18 bugs beyond the capabilities of existing static analyses for Verilog bug detection (i.e., linters). These results underscore the transformative potential of sophisticated static analysis in hardware design. Our analysis suite and infrastructure are also highly reusable: on average, each bug-detection client built on our analysis suite requires about 270 LoC, compared to 5,700 LoC when developed from scratch. By open-sourcing the entire system, involving substantial engineering effort (100K+ LoC), we aim to encourage further innovation and applications of sophisticated static analysis for hardware, hopefully fostering a similarly vibrant ecosystem that software analysis enjoys.

The growing demand for productivity in hardware development opens up new opportunities for applying programming language (PL) techniques to hardware description languages (HDLs). Chisel, a leading agile HDL, embraces this shift by leveraging modern PL features to enhance hardware design productivity. However, verification for Chisel remains a major productivity bottleneck, requiring substantial time and manual effort. To address this issue, we advocate the use of static analysis —a technique proven well-suited to agile development workflows in software—for lightweight Chisel verification. This work establishes a theoretical foundation for Chisel static analysis. At its core is λ C , a formal core calculus of ChAIR (a Chisel-specific intermediate representation for analysis). λ C is the first formalism that captures the essence of Chisel while being deliberately minimal to ease rigorous reasoning about static analysis built on λ C . We prove key properties of λ C that reflect real hardware characteristics, which in turn offer a form of retrospective validation for its design. On the basis of λ C , we define and formalize the hardware value flow analysis (HVFA) problem, which underpins our static analyses for critical Chisel verification tasks, including bug detection and security analysis. We then propose a synchronized fixed-point solution to the HVFA problem, featuring hardware-specific treatment of the synchronous behavior of clock-driven hardware registers—the essential feature of Chisel programs. We further prove key theorems establishing the guarantees and limitations of our solution. As a proof of concept, we develop ChiSA (30K+ LoC)—the first Chisel static analyzer that can analyze intricate hardware value flows to enable lightweight analyses for critical Chisel verification tasks such as bug detection and security analysis. To facilitate thorough evaluation of both ChiSA and future work, we provide ChiSABench (11M+ LoC), a comprehensive benchmark for Chisel static analysis. Our evaluation on ChiSABench demonstrates that ChiSA offers an effective and significantly more lightweight approach for critical Chisel verification tasks, especially on large and complex real-world designs. For example, ChiSA identified 69 violable developer-inserted assertions in large-scale Chisel designs (9.7M+ LoC) in under 200 seconds—eight of which were recognized by developers and scheduled for future fixes—and detected all 60 information-leak vulnerabilities in the well-known TrustHub benchmark (1.1M+ LoC) in just one second—outperforming state-of-the-art Chisel approaches like ChiselTest’s bounded model checking and ChiselFlow’s secure type system. These results underscore the high promise of static analysis for lightweight Chisel verification. To encourage continued research and innovation, we will fully open-source ChiSA (30K+ LoC) and ChiSABench (11M+ LoC).