Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ofri Hefetz

dblp:425/7807 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › lexical semantics › multiword expression
idiom detection
0.912025
Easy as PIE? Identifying Multi-Word Expressions with LLMs · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › phrase extraction
multiword expression identification
0.912025
Easy as PIE? Identifying Multi-Word Expressions with LLMs · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model prompting · 0.9few-shot prompting · 0.9chain-of-thought prompting · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Easy as PIE? Identifying Multi-Word Expressions with LLMs
abstract
We investigate the identification of idiomatic expressions-a semantically noncompositional subclass of multiword expressions (MWEs)-in running text using large language models (LLMs) without any fine-tuning.Instead, we adopt a prompt-based approach and evaluate a range of prompting strategies, including zero-shot, few-shot, and chain-of-thought variants, across multiple languages, datasets, and model types.Our experiments show that, with well-crafted prompts, LLMs can perform competitively with supervised models trained on annotated data.These findings highlight the potential of prompt-based LLMs as a flexible and effective alternative for idiomatic expression identification.
Kai Golan Hashiloni, Ofri Hefetz, Kfir Bar
EMNLP2