EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chenjie Ni
dblp:425/8056
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Efficient and distributed learning · 67% Language models and text generation · 33% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › knowledge in language models › memorization
memorization in language models |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Controllable Memorization in LLMs via Weight Pruning · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Controllable Memorization in LLMs via Weight Pruning · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning
weight pruning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Controllable Memorization in LLMs via Weight Pruning · EMNLP 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › model privacy
training data memorization |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Controllable Memorization in LLMs via Weight Pruning · EMNLP 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gradient-based weight pruning · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Controllable Memorization in LLMs via Weight PruningabstractThe evolution of pre-trained large language models (LLMs) has significantly transformed natural language processing.However, these advancements pose challenges, particularly the unintended memorization of training data, which raises ethical and privacy concerns.While prior research has largely focused on mitigating memorization or extracting memorized information, the deliberate control of memorization has been underexplored.This study addresses this gap by introducing a novel and unified gradient-based weight pruning framework to freely control memorization rates in LLMs.Our method enables fine-grained control over pruning parameters, allowing models to suppress or enhance memorization based on application-specific requirements.Experimental results demonstrate that our approach effectively balances the trade-offs between memorization and generalization, with an increase of up to 89.3% in Fractional ER suppression and 40.9% in Exact ER amplification compared to the original models. Chenjie Ni, Zhepeng Wang 0001, Runxue Bao, Shangqian Gao, Yanfu Zhang |
EMNLP | 1 |