As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains such as education, healthcare, and law, accurately evaluating their nuanced reasoning process becomes essential to ensure their safety, reliability, and trustworthiness. However, most existing benchmarks evaluate LLMs at a coarse granularity. Current benchmarks lack a unified framework and rely on single‐task datasets, overlooking the intermediate steps of complex reasoning. This results in redundant overlap across benchmarks, poor generalization to multifaceted real-world tasks, and underutilizes the rich reasoning traces generated by advanced LLMs.

Yizhou Ying, Geng Zhang, Cui Danxin, Chengyu Du, Guanglei Yue, Sihang Jiang, Jiaqing Liang, Yifei Fu, Hailin Hu, Yanghua Xiao. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025.