Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jonathan M. Shaffer

dblp:426/0779 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
sequencing data analysis
0.912025
UMI-nea: a fast, robust tool for reference-free UMI deduplication and accurate quantification · Bioinform. 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequencing data processing
unique molecular identifier deduplication
0.912025
UMI-nea: a fast, robust tool for reference-free UMI deduplication and accurate quantification · Bioinform. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

levenshtein distance · 0.9clustering · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 UMI-nea: a fast, robust tool for reference-free UMI deduplication and accurate quantification
abstract
MOTIVATION: One of the key applications of Unique Molecular Identifiers (UMIs) in high-throughput sequencing is to correct for PCR amplification bias and removal of PCR duplicates, thereby improving quantification in DNA-seq and RNA-seq applications. Accurately grouping error-bearing UMIs that originate from the same input molecule through a UMI deduplication method is a critical step in this process. However, many existing UMI deduplication tools rely on simple Hamming distance comparisons or suboptimal clustering algorithms, often resulting in erroneous UMI groupings, particularly in error-prone long-read sequencing or ultra-high-depth short-read sequencing. RESULTS: We introduce UMI-nea, a tool that utilizes Levenshtein distance comparisons and a novel clustering approach to optimize multithreading workflows. Compared against three other indel-aware UMI deduplication tools, UMI-nea achieves more accurate UMI groupings with efficient run time. It demonstrates robust performance across diverse sequencing platforms, depths, and UMI lengths. Additionally, UMI-nea incorporates a data-guided adaptive UMI filter, further enhancing quantification accuracy. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: UMI-nea is available on github https://github.com/Qiaseq-research/UMI-nea.git or Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16745758. Sequencing data are stored at https://qiagenpublic.blob.core.windows.net/umi-nea-datasets/.
Jixin Deng, Jingxiao Zhang, Song Tian, John Dicarlo, Samuel J. Rulli, Jonathan M. Shaffer, Töresin Karakoyun
Bioinform.7